Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Man, Y.

Publications and source records attributed to Man, Y..

20 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Consideration of macrophage phenotypes under biomaterials mediated host defense process

Culturing macrophage in vitro is an important means to understand its reaction towards co-culture substances. However, the source of macrophages can be either purchased from specific cell line or extracted from bone marrow as differentiated macrophages. In order to assure the precision, when adopting extracted primary cell, screening in advance will be prominent before any processes to avoid results reserving that of non-macrophages. Here, we perform single-cell sequencing on open wound of skin in mice and focusing on the secreted proteins and surface markers related to traditional macrophage phenotypes (M1/M2) to ensure the importance of screening. The expression of CAMP when macrophages fight against candida albicans is another target to see its relationship with current classification. And results showed that identifying its phenotype without screening macrophages will far from the exact situation, and the expression of CAMP cannot be carried out by the traditional M1 and M2 macrophage. Thus, determining phenotype of macrophages based on function would be a promising way.

immunology↗

ARG1 could be expressed by human, but not represent for repair

Arginase 1 (ARG1), typically expressed under stress or stimulation rather than in the healthy condition in humans. However, more and more studies claim ARG1 could be expressed by human and represents healing process. Including THP-1 monocyte shift to M2 macrophages rendered a higher expression of ARG1 than that with bone-graft has an ideal effect on anti-inflammation, resulting in tissue healing. With the higher expression of ARG1 seemingly induced by the constructed material and represented by the anti-inflammatory situation. For these reasons, this study focuses on whether traditional markers of macrophages could be express by human or not during clinical healing process. Through harvesting bone tissue samples during bone healing process and confirm the expression of markers at transcriptome and protein levels. The results showed the expression of ARG1 relatively low by bulk-RNA sequencing, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), immunofluorescence (IF) and flow cytometry or could not be detected during process of healing of healthy donor. Taken together, results indicate that the ARG1 is not chosen for a regenerative marker in human bone tissue.

immunology↗