Biology subjects

Makaroff, S. N.

Publications and source records attributed to Makaroff, S. N..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2023

Software Package for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Coil and Coil Array Analysis and Design

ObjectiveThis study aims to describe a MATLAB software package for transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) coil analysis and design. ApproachElectric and magnetic fields of the coils as well as their self- and mutual (for coil arrays) inductances are computed, with or without a magnetic core. Solid and stranded (Litz wire) conductors are also taken into consideration. The starting point is the centerline of a coil conductor(s), which is a 3D curve defined by the user. Then, a wire mesh and a computer aided design (CAD) mesh for the volume conductor of a given cross-section (circular, elliptical, or rectangular) are automatically generated. Self- and mutual inductances of the coil(s) are computed. Given the conductor current and its time derivative, electric and magnetic fields of the coil(s) are determined anywhere in space. Computations are performed with the fast multipole method (FMM), which is the most efficient way to evaluate the fields of many elementary current elements (current dipoles) comprising the current carrying conductor at a large number of observation points. This is the major underlying mathematical operation behind both inductance and field calculations. Main ResultsThe wire-based approach enables precise replication of even the most complex physical conductor geometries, while the FMM acceleration quickly evaluates large quantities of elementary current filaments. Agreement to within 0.74% was obtained between the inductances computed by the FMM method and ANSYS Maxwell 3D for the same coil model. Although not provided in this study, it is possible to evaluate non-linear magnetic cores in addition to the linear core exemplified. An experimental comparison was carried out against a physical MagVenture C-B60 coil; the measured and simulated inductances differed by only 1.25%, and nearly perfect correlation was found between the measured and computed E-field values at each observation point. SignificanceThe developed software package is applicable to any quasistatic inductor design, not necessarily to the TMS coils only.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2023

An Adaptive H-Refinement Method for the Boundary Element Fast Multipole Method for Quasi-static Electromagnetic Modeling

ObjectiveIn our recent work pertinent to modeling of brain stimulation and neurophysiological recordings, substantial modeling errors in the computed electric field and potential have sometimes been observed for standard multi-compartment head models. The goal of this study is to quantify those errors and, further, eliminate them through an adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) algorithm. The study concentrates on transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), transcranial electrical stimulation (TES), and electroencephalography (EEG) forward problems. ApproachWe propose, describe, and systematically investigate an AMR method using the Boundary Element Method with Fast Multipole Acceleration (BEM-FMM) as the base numerical solver. The goal is to efficiently allocate additional unknowns to critical areas of the model, where they will best improve solution accuracy. The implemented AMR methods accuracy improvement is measured on head models constructed from 16 Human Connectome Project subjects under problem classes of TES, TMS, and EEG. Errors are computed between three solutions: an initial non-adaptive solution, a solution found after applying AMR with a conservative refinement rate, and a "silver-standard" solution found by subsequent 4:1 global refinement of the adaptively-refined model. Main ResultsExcellent agreement is shown between the adaptively-refined and silver-standard solutions for standard head models. AMR is found to be vital for accurate modeling of TES and EEG forward problems for standard models: an increase of less than 25% (on average) in number of mesh elements for these problems, efficiently allocated by AMR, exposes electric field/potential errors exceeding 60% (on average) in the solution for the unrefined models. SignificanceThis error has especially important implications for TES dosing prediction - where the stimula t ion strength plays a central role - and for EEG lead fields. Though the specific form of the AMR method described here is implemented for the BEM-FMM, we expect that AMR is applicable and even required for accurate electromagnetic simulations by other numerical modeling packages as well.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2023

An In-Silico Testbed for Fast and Accurate MR Labeling of Orthopaedic Implants

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWOne limitation on the ability to monitor health in older adults using Magnetic Resonance (MR) imaging is the presence of implants, where the prevalence of implantable devices (orthopedic, cardiac, neuromodulation) increases in the population, as does the pervasiveness of conditions requiring MRI studies for diagnosis (musculoskeletal diseases, infections, or cancer). The present study describes a novel multiphysics implant modeling testbed using the following approaches with two examples: - an in-silico human model based on the widely available Visible Human Project (VHP) cryo-section dataset; - a finite element method (FEM) modeling software workbench from Ansys (Electronics Desktop/Mechanical) to model MR radio frequency (RF) coils and the temperature rise modeling in heterogeneous media. The in-silico VHP Female model (250 parts with an additional 40 components specifically characterizing embedded implants and resultant surrounding tissues) corresponds to a 60-year-old female with a body mass index (BMI) of 36. The testbed includes the FEM-compatible in-silico human model, an implant embedding procedure, a generic parameterizable MRI RF birdcage two-port coil model, a workflow for computing heat sources on the implant surface and in adjacent tissues, and a thermal FEM solver directly linked to the MR coil simulator to determine implant heating based on an MR imaging study protocol. The primary target is MR labeling of large orthopaedic implants. The testbed has very recently been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a medical device development tool (MDDT) for 1.5 T orthopaedic implant examinations.

biophysics↗

bioRxiv2022

High-Resolution EEG Source Reconstruction with Boundary Element Fast Multipole Method Using Reciprocity Principle and TES Forward Model Matrix

BackgroundAccurate high-resolution EEG source reconstruction (localization) is important for several tasks, including rigorous and rapid mental health screening. ObjectiveThe present study has developed, validated, and applied a new source localization algorithm utilizing a charge-based boundary element fast multipole method (BEM-FMM) coupled with the Helmholtz reciprocity principle and the transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) forward solution. MethodsThe unknown cortical dipole density is reconstructed over the entire cortical surface by expanding into global basis functions in the form of cortical fields of active TES electrode pairs. These pairs are constructed from the reading electrodes. An analog of the minimum norm estimation (MNE) equation is obtained after substituting this expansion into the reciprocity principle written in terms of measured electrode voltages. Delaunay (geometrically balanced) triangulation of the electrode cap is introduced first. Basis functions for all electrode pairs connected by the edges of a triangular mesh are precomputed and stored in memory. A smaller set of independent basis functions is then selected and employed at every time instant. This set is based on the highest voltage differences measured. ResultsThe method is validated against the classic, yet challenging problem of median nerve stimulation and the tangential cortical sources located at the posterior wall of the central sulcus for an N20/P20 peak (2 scanned subjects). The method is further applied to perform source reconstruction of synthesized tangential cortical sources located at the posterior wall of the central sulcus (12 different subjects). In the second case, an average source reconstruction error of 7 mm is reported for the best possible noiseless scenario. ConclusionsOnce static preprocessing with TES electrodes has been done (the basis functions have been computed), our method requires fractions of a second to complete the accurate high-resolution source localization.

neuroscience↗