Biology subjects

Major Depressive Disorder Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium,

Publications and source records attributed to Major Depressive Disorder Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium,.

12 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2018

Variably methylated regions in the newborn epigenome: environmental, genetic and combined influences

BackgroundEpigenetic processes, including DNA methylation (DNAm), are among the mechanisms allowing integration of genetic and environmental factors to shape cellular function. While many studies have investigated either environmental or genetic contributions to DNAm, few have assessed their integrated effects. We examined the relative contributions of prenatal environmental factors and genotype on DNA methylation in neonatal blood at variably methylated regions (VMRs), defined as consecutive CpGs showing the highest variability of DNAm in 4 independent cohorts (PREDO, DCHS, UCI, MoBa, N=2,934).\n\nResultsWe used Akaikes information criterion to test which factors best explained variability of methylation in the cohort-specific VMRs: several prenatal environmental factors (E) including maternal demographic, psychosocial and metabolism related phenotypes, genotypes in cis (G), or their additive (G+E) or interaction (GxE) effects. G+E and GxE models consistently best explained variability in DNAm of VMRs across the cohorts, with G explaining the remaining sites best. VMRs best explained by G, GxE or G+E, as well as their associated functional genetic variants (predicted using deep learning algorithms), were located in distinct genomic regions, with different enrichments for transcription and enhancer marks. Genetic variants of not only G and G+E models, but also of variants in GxE models were significantly enriched in genome wide association studies (GWAS) for complex disorders.\n\nConclusionGenetic and environmental factors in combination best explain DNAm at VMRs. The CpGs best explained by G, G+E or GxE are functionally distinct. The enrichment of GxE variants in GWAS for complex disorders supports their importance for disease risk.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2018

Genome-wide meta-analysis of depression in 807,553 individuals identifies 102 independent variants with replication in a further 1,507,153 individuals

Major depression is a debilitating psychiatric illness that is typically associated with low mood, anhedonia and a range of comorbidities. Depression has a heritable component that has remained difficult to elucidate with current sample sizes due to the polygenic nature of the disorder. To maximise sample size, we meta-analysed data on 807,553 individuals (246,363 cases and 561,190 controls) from the three largest genome-wide association studies of depression. We identified 102 independent variants, 269 genes, and 15 gene-sets associated with depression, including both genes and gene-pathways associated with synaptic structure and neurotransmission. Further evidence of the importance of prefrontal brain regions in depression was provided by an enrichment analysis. In an independent replication sample of 1,306,354 individuals (414,055 cases and 892,299 controls), 87 of the 102 associated variants were significant following multiple testing correction. Based on the putative genes associated with depression this work also highlights several potential drug repositioning opportunities. These findings advance our understanding of the complex genetic architecture of depression and provide several future avenues for understanding aetiology and developing new treatment approaches.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2018

Does Neuroticism Cause Depression? A Mendelian Randomization Study

Neuroticism is a heritable personality trait, characterized by negative emotions such as worrying, feelings of guilt, loneliness and being easily hurt. Increased levels of neuroticism are associated with poor mental health - development of depression in particular - but it remains uncertain whether this association represents a causal effect [1]. Here, we use Mendelian randomization (MR) to investigate whether neuroticism is a causal risk factor for development of depression.\n\nMR is an analytic approach to assess the causality of an observed association between a risk factor and a clinically relevant outcome [2]. MR is particularly useful in situations where randomized controlled trials are not possible and observational studies provide biased associations because of confounding or reverse causality. MR uses genome-wide association study (GWAS) data to identify instrumental variables (single nucleotide polymorphisms; SNPs) for a risk f ...

genetics↗

bioRxiv2018

Genome-wide association study of suicide attempt in psychiatric disorders identifies association with major depression polygenic risk scores

ObjectiveOver 90% of suicide attempters have a psychiatric diagnosis, however twin and family studies suggest that the genetic etiology of suicide attempt (SA) is partially distinct from that of the psychiatric disorders themselves. Here, we present the largest genome-wide association study (GWAS) on suicide attempt using major depressive disorder (MDD), bipolar disorder (BIP) and schizophrenia (SCZ) cohorts from the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium.\n\nMethodSamples comprise 1622 suicide attempters and 8786 non-attempters with MDD, 3264 attempters and 5500 non-attempters with BIP and 1683 attempters and 2946 non-attempters with SCZ. SA GWAS were performed comparing attempters to non-attempters in each disorder followed by meta-analysis across disorders. Polygenic risk scoring investigated the genetic relationship between SA and the psychiatric disorders.\n\nResultsThree genome-wide significant loci for SA were found: one associated with SA in MDD, one in BIP, and one in the meta-analysis of SA in mood disorders. These associations were not replicated in independent mood disorder cohorts from the UK Biobank and iPSYCH. Polygenic risk scores for major depression were significantly associated with SA in MDD (P=0.0002), BIP (P=0.0006) and SCZ (P=0.0006).\n\nConclusionsThis study provides new information on genetic associations and the genetic etiology of SA across psychiatric disorders. The finding that polygenic risk scores for major depression predict suicide attempt across disorders provides a possible starting point for predictive modelling and preventative strategies. Further collaborative efforts to increase sample size hold potential to robustly identify genetic associations and gain biological insights into the etiology of suicide attempt.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2018

Evidence of causal effect of major depression on alcohol dependence: Findings from the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium

BackgroundDespite established clinical associations among major depression (MD), alcohol dependence (AD), and alcohol consumption (AC), the nature of the causal relationship between them is not completely understood.\n\nMethodsThis study was conducted using genome-wide data from the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (MD: 135,458 cases and 344,901 controls; AD: 10,206 cases and 28,480 controls) and UK Biobank (AC-Frequency: from \"daily or almost daily\" to \"never\", 438,308 individuals; AC-Quantity: total units of alcohol per week, 307,098 individuals). Linkage disequilibrium score regression and Mendelian Randomization (MR) analyses were applied to investigate shared genetic mechanisms (horizontal pleiotropy) and causal relationships (mediated pleiotropy) among these traits.\n\nOutcomesPositive genetic correlation was observed between MD and AD (rgMD-AD=+0.47, P=6.6x10-10). AC-Quantity showed positive genetic correlation with both AD (rgAD-AC-Quantity=+0.75, P=1.8x10-14) and MD (rgMD-AC-Quantity=+0.14, P=2.9x10-7), while there was negative correlation of AC-Frequency with MD (rgMD-AC-Frequency=-0.17, P=1.5x10-10) and a non-significant result with AD. MR analyses confirmed the presence of pleiotropy among these traits. However, the MD-AD results reflect a mediated-pleiotropy mechanism (i.e., causal relationship) with a causal role of MD on AD (beta=0.28, P=1.29x10-6) that does not appear to be biased by confounding such as horizontal pleiotropy. No evidence of reverse causation was observed as the AD genetic instrument did not show a causal effect on MD.\n\nInterpretationResults support a causal role for MD on AD based on genetic datasets including thousands of individuals. Understanding mechanisms underlying MD-AD comorbidity not only addresses important public health concerns but also has the potential to facilitate prevention and intervention efforts.\n\nFundingNational Institute of Mental Health and National Institute on Drug Abuse.\n\nPutting data into contextO_ST_ABSEvidence before this studyC_ST_ABSWe searched PubMed up to August 24, 2018, for research studies that investigated causality among alcohol-and depression related phenotypes using Mendelian randomization approaches. We used the search terms \"alcohol\" AND \"depression\" AND \"Mendelian Randomization\". No restrictions were applied to language, date, or article type. Ten articles were retrieved, but only two were focused on alcohol consumption and depression-related traits. The studies were based on genetic variants in alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) genes only, did not find evidence for a causal effect of alcohol consumption on depression phenotypes, with one study finding a causal effect of alcohol consumption on alcoholism. Both studies noted that future studies are needed with increased sample sizes and clinically derived phenotypes. To our knowledge, no previous study has applied two-sample Mendelian randomization to investigate causal relationships between alcohol dependence and major depression.\n\nTwin studies show genetic factors influence susceptibility to MD, AD, and alcohol consumption. Differently from observational approaches where several studies have investigated the relationship between alcohol-and depression-related phenotypes, very limited use of molecular genetic data has been applied to investigate this issue. Additionally, the use of genetic information has been shown to be less biased by confounders and reverse causation than observation data. However, genetic approaches, like Mendelian randomization, require large sample sizes to be informative.\n\nAdded value of this studyIn this study, we used genome-wide data from the Psychiatric Genomic Consortium and UK Biobank, which include information regarding hundred thousands of individuals, to test the presence of shared genetic mechanisms and causal relationships among major depression, alcohol dependence, and alcohol consumption. The results support a causal influence of MD on AD, while alcohol consumption showed shared genetic mechanisms with respect to both major depression and alcohol dependence.\n\nImplications of all the available evidenceGiven the significant morbidity and mortality associated with MD, AD, and the comorbid condition, understanding mechanisms underlying these associations not only address important public health concerns but also has the potential to facilitate prevention and intervention efforts.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2018

Replication of the diathesis-stress model for depression in Generation Scotland.

Depression has well-established influences from genetic and environmental risk factors. This has led to the diathesis-stress theory, which assumes a multiplicative gene-by-environment interaction (GxE) effect on risk. Recently, Colodro-Conde et al. empirically tested this theory, using the polygenic risk score for major depressive disorder (PRS, genes) and stressful life events (SLE, environment) effects on depressive symptoms, identifying significant GxE effects with an additive contribution to liability. We have tested the diathesis-stress theory on an independent sample of 4 919 individuals.\n\nWe identified nominally significant positive GxE effects in the full cohort (R2 = 0.08%, p = 0.049) and in women (R2 = 0.19%, p = 0.017), but not in men (R2 = 0.15%, p = 0.07). GxE effects were nominally significant, but only in women, when SLE were split into those in which the respondent plays an active or passive role (R2 = 0.15%, p = 0.038; R2 = 0.16%, p = 0.033, respectively). High PRS increased the risk of depression in participants reporting high numbers of SLE (p = 2.86 x 10-4). However, in those participants who reported no recent SLE, a higher PRS appeared to increase the risk of depressive symptoms in men ({beta} = 0.082, p = 0.016) but had a protective effect in women ({beta} = -0.061, p = 0.037). This difference was nominally significant (p = 0.017). Our study reinforces the evidence of additional risk in the aetiology of depression due to GxE effects. However, larger sample sizes are required to robustly validate these findings.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2018

The genetics of the mood disorder spectrum: genome-wide association analyses of over 185,000 cases and 439,000 controls

BackgroundMood disorders (including major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder) affect 10-20% of the population. They range from brief, mild episodes to severe, incapacitating conditions that markedly impact lives. Despite their diagnostic distinction, multiple approaches have shown considerable sharing of risk factors across the mood disorders.\n\nMethodsTo clarify their shared molecular genetic basis, and to highlight disorder-specific associations, we meta-analysed data from the latest Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (PGC) genome-wide association studies of major depression (including data from 23andMe) and bipolar disorder, and an additional major depressive disorder cohort from UK Biobank (total: 185,285 cases, 439,741 controls; non-overlapping N = 609,424).\n\nResultsSeventy-three loci reached genome-wide significance in the meta-analysis, including 15 that are novel for mood disorders. More genome-wide significant loci from the PGC analysis of major depression than bipolar disorder reached genome-wide significance. Genetic correlations revealed that type 2 bipolar disorder correlates strongly with recurrent and single episode major depressive disorder. Systems biology analyses highlight both similarities and differences between the mood disorders, particularly in the mouse brain cell types implicated by the expression patterns of associated genes. The mood disorders also differ in their genetic correlation with educational attainment - positive in bipolar disorder but negative in major depressive disorder.\n\nConclusionsThe mood disorders share several genetic associations, and can be combined effectively to increase variant discovery. However, we demonstrate several differences between these disorders. Analysing subtypes of major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder provides evidence for a genetic mood disorders spectrum.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2018

Testing Causal Bidirectional Influences between Physical Activity and Depression using Mendelian Randomization

BackgroundBurgeoning evidence from randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies suggests that physical activity protects against depression, pointing to a potential modifiable target for prevention. However, the direction of this inverse association is not clear: physical activity may reduce risk for depression, and/or depression may result in decreased physical activity. Here, we used bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) to test causal influences between physical activity and depression.\n\nMethodsFor genetic instruments, we selected independent top SNPs associated with major depressive disorder (MDD, N = 143,265) and two physical activity phenotypes--self-reported (N = 377,234) and objective accelerometer-based (N = 91,084)--from the largest available, non-overlapping genome-wide association results. We used two sets of genetic instruments: (1) only SNPs previously reported as genome-wide significant, and (2) top SNPs meeting a more relaxed threshold (p < 1x10-7). For each direction of influence, we combined the MR effect estimates from each instrument SNP using inverse variance weighted (IVW) meta-analysis, along with other standard MR methods such as weighted median, MR-Egger, and MR-PRESSO.\n\nResultsWe found evidence for protective influences of accelerometer-based activity on MDD (IVW odds ratio (OR) = 0.74 for MDD per 1 SD unit increase in average acceleration, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.59-0.92, p =.006) when using SNPs meeting the relaxed threshold (i.e., 10 versus only 2 genome-wide significant SNPs, which provided insufficient data for sensitivity analyses). In contrast, we found no evidence for negative influences of MDD on accelerometer-based activity (IVW b = 0.04 change in average acceleration for MDD versus control status, 95% CI = -0.43-0.51, p =.87). Furthermore, we did not see evidence for causal influences between self-reported activity and MDD, in either direction and regardless of instrument SNP criteria.\n\nDiscussionWe apply MR for the first time to examine causal influences between physical activity and MDD. We discover that objectively measured--but not self-reported--physical activity is inversely associated with MDD. Of note, prior work has shown that accelerometer-based physical activity is more heritable than self-reported activity, in addition to being more representative of actual movement. Our findings validate physical activity as a protective factor for MDD and point to the importance of objective measurement of physical activity in epidemiological studies in relation to mental health. Overall, this study supports the hypothesis that enhancing physical activity is an effective prevention strategy for depression.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2018

Prospective Study of Polygenic Risk, Protective Factors, and Incident Depression Following Combat Deployment in US Army Soldiers

BackgroundWhereas genetic susceptibility increases risk for major depressive disorder (MDD), non-genetic protective factors may mitigate this risk. In a large-scale prospective study of US Army soldiers, we examined whether trait resilience and/or unit cohesion could buffer against the onset of MDD following combat deployment, even in soldiers at high polygenic risk.\n\nMethodsData were analyzed from 4,182 soldiers of European ancestry assessed before and after their deployment to Afghanistan. Incident MDD was defined as no MDD episode at predeployment, followed by a MDD episode following deployment. Polygenic risk scores were constructed from the largest available MDD genome-wide association study. We first examined main effects of the MDD PRS and each protective factor on incident MDD. We then tested effects of each protective factor on incident MDD across strata of polygenic risk.\n\nResultsPolygenic risk showed a dose-response relationship to depression, such that soldiers at high polygenic risk had greatest odds for incident MDD. Both unit cohesion and trait resilience were prospectively associated with reduced risk for incident MDD. Notably, the protective effect of unit cohesion persisted even in soldiers at highest polygenic risk.\n\nConclusionsPolygenic risk was associated with new-onset MDD in deployed soldiers. However, unit cohesion--an index of perceived support and morale--was protective against incident MDD even among those at highest genetic risk, and may represent a potent target for promoting resilience in vulnerable soldiers. Findings illustrate the value of combining genomic and environmental data in a prospective design to identify robust protective factors for mental health.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2018

Using genetic drug-target networks to develop new drug hypotheses for major depressive disorder

The major depressive disorder (MDD) working group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (PGC) has published a genome-wide association study (GWAS) for MDD in 130,664 cases, identifying 44 risk variants. We used these results to investigate potential drug targets and repurposing opportunities. We built easily interpretable bipartite drug-target networks integrating interactions between drugs and their targets, genome-wide association statistics and genetically predicted expression levels in different tissues, using our online tool Drug Targetor (drugtargetor.com). We also investigated drug-target relationships and drug effects on gene expression that could be impacting MDD. MAGMA was used to perform pathway analyses and S-PrediXcan to investigate the directionality of tissue-specific expression levels in patients vs. controls. Outside the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) region, 25 druggable genes were significantly associated with MDD after multiple testing correction, and 19 were suggestively significant. Several drug classes were significantly enriched, including monoamine reuptake inhibitors, sex hormones, antipsychotics and antihistamines, indicating an effect on MDD and potential repurposing opportunities. These findings require validation in model systems and clinical examination, but also show that GWAS may become a rich source of new therapeutic hypotheses for MDD and other psychiatric disorders that need new - and better - treatment options.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2018

Association of whole-genome and NETRIN1 signaling pathway-derived polygenic risk scores for Major Depressive Disorder and thalamic radiation white matter microstructure in UK Biobank

BackgroundMajor Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a clinically heterogeneous psychiatric disorder with a polygenic architecture. Genome-wide association studies have identified a number of risk-associated variants across the genome, and growing evidence of NETRIN1 pathway involvement. Stratifying disease risk by genetic variation within the NETRIN1 pathway may provide an important route for identification of disease mechanisms by focusing on a specific process excluding heterogeneous risk-associated variation in other pathways. Here, we sought to investigate whether MDD polygenic risk scores derived from the NETRIN1 signaling pathway (NETRIN1-PRS) and the whole genome excluding NETRIN1 pathway genes (genomic-PRS) were associated with white matter integrity.\n\nMethodsWe used two diffusion tensor imaging measures, fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD), in the most up-to-date UK Biobank neuroimaging data release (FA: N = 6,401; MD: N = 6,390).\n\nResultsWe found significantly lower FA in the superior longitudinal fasciculus ({beta} = -0.035, pcorrected = 0.029) and significantly higher MD in a global measure of thalamic radiations ({beta} = 0.029, pcorrected = 0.021), as well as higher MD in the superior ({beta} = 0.034, pcorrected = 0.039) and inferior ({beta} = 0.029, pcorrected = 0.043) longitudinal fasciculus and in the anterior ({beta} = 0.025, pcorrected = 0.046) and superior ({beta} = 0.027, pcorrected = 0.043) thalamic radiation associated with NETRIN1-PRS. Genomic-PRS was also associated with lower FA and higher MD in several tracts.\n\nConclusionsOur findings indicate that variation in the NETRIN1 signaling pathway may confer risk for MDD through effects on thalamic radiation white matter microstructure.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2018

Genome-wide gene-environment analyses of depression and reported lifetime traumatic experiences in UK Biobank

Depression is more frequently observed among individuals exposed to traumatic events. The relationship between trauma exposure and depression, including the role of genetic variation, is complex and poorly understood. The UK Biobank concurrently assessed depression and reported trauma exposure in 126,522 genotyped individuals of European ancestry. We compared the shared aetiology of depression and a range of phenotypes, contrasting individuals reporting trauma exposure with those who did not (final sample size range: 24,094-92,957). Depression was heritable in participants reporting trauma exposure and in unexposed individuals, and the genetic correlation between the groups was substantial and not significantly different from 1. Genetic correlations between depression and psychiatric traits were strong regardless of reported trauma exposure, whereas genetic correlations between depression and body mass index (and related phenotypes) were observed only in trauma exposed individuals. The narrower range of genetic correlations in trauma unexposed depression and the lack of correlation with BMI echoes earlier ideas of endogenous depression.

genomics↗