Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Maiwald, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Maiwald, S..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Hide and seek: de novo identification in sugar beet reveals impact of non-autonomous LTR retrotransposons

Plant genomes are filled with retrotransposons and their derivatives, subject to constant sequence turnover. As short, non-autonomous retrotransposons do not encode a protein product, they experience reduced selective constraints on their DNA sequence, leading to diversification into multiple families, usually limited to only a few species. This absence of any coding capacity and their tendency to form subfamilies are the reasons for the incomplete description of non-autonomous LTR retrotransposons in most to all genomic repeat annotations. Here, we focus on non-autonomous LTR retrotransposon identification. Are all of these sequences derivatives of easier-to-identify full-length elements? Or is there more variability, which is currently overlooked? For this, we capitalize on our comprehensive understanding of the TE landscape in sugar beet to assess the extent of the blind spot on non-autonomous LTR retrotransposons Here, we present a workflow to identify non-autonomous LTR retrotransposons without prior sequence information, retrieving more than 100 families within the sugar beet genome. We only include TEs without the ability for complete self mobilization. Spanning up to 15,000 bp, these non-autonomous families are often longer than expected and characterized by reshuffling and modular evolution. Most strikingly, only a few of these families are directly derived from autonomous partners, showing that there is a large, undiscovered TE variety in the non-autonomous TE fraction. We highlight that a large fraction of non-autonomous TEs wont be retrieved with the current TE identification workflows, even if the output is well-curated and condensed into TE libraries and suggest procedures to remedy this gap. This study is the first insight into the non-autonomous LTR retrotransposon landscape within a single genome and serves as an example to estimate the error in non-autonomous TE detection.

genomics↗

Evolving together: Cassandra retrotransposons gradually mirror promoter mutations of the 5S rRNA genes

The 5S rRNA genes are among the most conserved nucleotide sequences across all species. Similar to the 5S preservation we observe the occurrence of 5S-related non-autonomous retrotransposons, so-called Cassandra. Cassandras harbor highly conserved 5S rDNA-related sequences within their long terminal repeats (LTRs), advantageously providing them with the 5S internal promoter. However, the dynamics of Cassandra retrotransposon evolution in the context of 5S rRNA gene sequence information and structural arrangement are still unclear, especially: 1) do we observe repeated or gradual domestication of the highly conserved 5S promoter by Cassandras and 2) do changes in 5S organization such as in the linked 35S-5S rDNA arrangements impact Cassandra evolution? Here, we show evidence for gradual co-evolution of Cassandra sequences with their corresponding 5S rDNAs. To follow the impact of 5S rDNA variability on Cassandra TEs, we investigate the Asteraceae family where highly variable 5S rDNAs, including 5S promoter shifts and both linked and separated 35S-5S rDNA arrangements have been reported. Cassandras within the Asteraceae mirror 5S rDNA promoter mutations of their host genome, likely as an adaptation to the hosts specific 5S transcription factors and hence compensating for evolutionary changes in the 5S rDNA sequence. Changes in the 5S rDNA sequence and in Cassandras seem uncorrelated with linked/separated rDNA arrangements. We place all these observations into the context of angiosperm 5S rDNA-Cassandra evolution, discuss Cassandras origin hypotheses (single or multiple) and Cassandras possible impact on rDNA and plant genome organization, giving new insights into the interplay of ribosomal genes and transposable elements.

evolutionary biology↗