Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Maheras, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Maheras, A..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Reward Memories Bias Instrumental Rule Selection via the Orbitofrontal-to-Secondary Motor cortex Pathway

Reward-predictive cues can influence decision-making and promote the pursuit of specific outcomes. This influence is classically studied using specific Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer (sPIT), in which Pavlovian cues bias action selection and promote the instrumental action (often a left or right lever press) directed toward the cued outcome. However, naturalistic reward pursuit often extends beyond selecting discrete actions and requires selecting abstract rules that organize multiple actions into goal-directed sequences. The influence of cued reward memories on such rule selection has received less attention, and the neural circuits mediating this effect remains largely unknown. Here, we developed the specific Pavlovian-to-Rules-to-Instrumental Transfer (sPRInT) task, an adaptation of sPIT designed to examine how Pavlovian reward cues bias instrumental rule selection. We then used pathway-specific chemogenetic silencing to test the contribution of orbitofrontal cortex projections to secondary motor cortex (OFC[->]M2) to this effect. Rats expressing hM4Di or mCherry in OFC[->]M2 neurons learned a three-step instrumental sequence (sample lever [->] nosepoke [->] choice lever). In alternating blocks, rats used either a delayed non-match-to-sample rule or a visually guided rule to select the final action in the sequence and earn distinct outcomes (dNMTS-O1; VIS-O2). In a second phase, two distinct auditory cues were established as Pavlovian predictors of the two outcomes (S1-O1; S2-O2). Finally, in nonrewarded probe tests preceded by DCZ injections, we examined how presentation of these Pavlovian cues biased instrumental choices by promoting the use of an abstract rule. In control (mCherry) rats, Pavlovian cues promoted the adoption of the rule corresponding to the cued outcome (S1 promoted dNMTS; S2 promoted the VIS rule). In hM4Di rats, DCZ-mediated inactivation of OFC[->]M2 projection neurons diminished this effect. In contrast, OFC[->]M2 inhibition spared conventional sPIT, in which reward-predictive cues directly biased action selection without requiring abstract rules or extended action sequences. These findings demonstrate that cued reward memories can govern abstract rule selection and identify OFC[->]M2 as a critical circuit for translating those memories into goal-appropriate behavioral strategies.

neuroscience↗

Sex differences in discrimination behavior and orbitofrontal engagement during context-gated reward prediction

Animals, including humans, rely on contextual information to interpret ambiguous stimuli. Impaired context processing is a hallmark of several neuropsychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia, autism spectrum disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder, and addiction. While sex differences in the prevalence and manifestations of these disorders are well established, potential sex differences in context processing remain uncertain. Here we examined sex differences in the contextual control over cue-evoked reward seeking and its neural correlates, in rats. Male and female rats were trained in a bidirectional occasion-setting preparation in which the validity of two auditory reward-predictive cues was informed by the presence, or absence, of a visual contextual feature (LIGHT: X+ / DARK: X- / LIGHT: Y- / DARK: Y+). Females were significantly slower to acquire contextual control over cue-evoked reward seeking. However, once established, the contextual control over behavior was more robust in female rats; it showed less within-session variability (less influence of prior reward) and greater resistance to acute stress. This superior contextual control achieved by females was accompanied by an increased activation of the orbitofrontal cortex compared to males. Critically, these behavioral and neural sex differences were specific to the contextual modulation process and not observed in simple, context-independent, reward prediction tasks. These results indicate a sex-biased trade-off between the speed of acquisition and the robustness of performance in the contextual modulation of cued reward seeking. The different distribution of sexes along the fast learning {leftrightarrow} steady performance continuum might reflect different levels of engagement of the orbitofrontal cortex, and might have implications for our understanding of sex differences in psychiatric disorders.

neuroscience↗