Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Magnano, C. S.

Publications and source records attributed to Magnano, C. S..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

A Framework for Benchmarking Pathway Reconstruction Algorithms

Cells coordinate diverse biological processes through interactions among thousands of molecules, but mapping these interactions comprehensively and systematically remains an open problem. Pathway reconstruction algorithms address this problem by linking molecules of interest, identified from high-throughput omics experiments, using prior knowledge encoded as background interaction networks. This process recovers intermediate molecules and interactions that were not directly measured in the experimental data but plausibly connect the observed molecules. It generates testable hypotheses about interactions that drive cell behavior and informs the choice of follow-up experiments. Many algorithms have been created over decades, each optimizing different computational objectives and relying on different assumptions. The resulting heterogeneity has made benchmarking challenging, limiting systematic comparisons. Therefore, selecting an algorithm for a given biological context remains a non-trivial and poorly informed task. This registered report presents a large-scale benchmark of pathway reconstruction algorithms, evaluating 14 algorithms across 822 datasets from four biological settings. To enable this benchmark, we introduce Signaling Pathway Reconstruction Analysis Streamliner (SPRAS), which standardizes algorithm inputs, outputs, and execution into a formal framework, enabling systematic comparison that was previously infeasible. We will assess each algorithm on reconstruction performance against gold standard pathways, algorithm similarity, and computational performance across different biological contexts. Together, these evaluations will provide quantitative evidence for understanding pathway reconstruction algorithm behavior and guiding algorithm selection.

bioinformatics↗

An approachable, flexible, and practical machine learning workshop for biologists

The increasing prevalence and importance of machine learning in biological research has created a need for machine learning training resources tailored towards biological researchers. However, existing resources are often inaccessible, infeasible, or inappropriate for biologists because they require significant computational and mathematical knowledge, demand an unrealistic time-investment, or teach skills primarily for computational researchers. We created the Machine Learning for Biologists (ML4Bio) workshop, a short, intensive workshop that empowers biological researchers to comprehend machine learning applications and pursue machine learning collaborations in their own research. The ML4Bio workshop focuses on classification and was designed around 3 principles: (a) focusing on preparedness over fluency or expertise, (b) necessitating minimal coding and mathematical background, and (c) requiring low time investment. It incorporates active learning methods and custom open source software that allows participants to explore machine learning workflows. After multiple sessions to improve workshop design, we performed a study on 3 workshop sessions. Despite some confusion around identifying subtle methodological flaws in machine learning workflows, participants generally reported that the workshop met their goals, provided them with valuable skills and knowledge, and greatly increased their beliefs that they could engage in research that uses machine learning. ML4Bio is an educational tool for biological researchers, and its creation and evaluation provides valuable insight into tailoring educational resources for active researchers in different domains. The workshop materials are available from https://carpentries-incubator.github.io/ml4bio-workshop/ and the ml4bio software is available from https://github.com/gitter-lab/ml4bio.

scientific communication and education↗

Automating parameter selection to avoid implausible biological pathway models

A common way to integrate and analyze large amounts of biological "omic" data is through pathway reconstruction: using condition-specific omic data to create a subnetwork of a generic background network that represents some process or cellular state. A challenge in pathway reconstruction is that adjusting pathway reconstruction algorithms parameters produces pathways with drastically different topological properties and biological interpretations. Due to the exploratory nature of pathway reconstruction, there is no ground truth for direct evaluation, so parameter tuning methods typically used in statistics and machine learning are inapplicable. We developed the pathway parameter advising algorithm to tune pathway reconstruction algorithms to minimize biologically implausible predictions. We leverage background knowledge in pathway databases to select pathways whose high-level structure resembles that of manually curated biological pathways. At the core of this method is a graphlet decomposition metric, which measures topological similarity to curated biological pathways. In order to evaluate pathway parameter advising, we compare its performance in avoiding implausible networks and reconstructing pathways from the NetPath database with other parameter selection methods across four pathway reconstruction algorithms. We also demonstrate how pathway parameter advising can guide construction of an influenza host factor network. Pathway parameter advising is method-agnostic; it is applicable to any pathway reconstruction algorithm with tunable parameters. Our pathway parameter advising software is available on GitHub at https://github.com/gitter-lab/pathway-parameter-advising and PyPI at https://pypi.org/project/pathwayParameterAdvising/.

bioinformatics↗