Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Madsen, M. A. J.

Publications and source records attributed to Madsen, M. A. J..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Single and paired TMS pulses engage spatially distinct corticomotor representations in human pericentral cortex

Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the primary motor hand area (M1-HAND) can assess corticomotor function in humans by evoking motor evoked potentials (MEP). Paired-pulse TMS at peri-threshold intensity elicits short-latency intracortical facilitation (SICF) with early peaks at inter-pulse intervals of 1.0-1.8ms (SICF1) and 2.4-3ms (SICF2). The similarity between the periodicity of SICF and indirect (I-)waves in the corticospinal volleys evoked by single-pulse TMS suggests that SICF originates from I-wave generating circuits. This study aimed to explore the mechanisms of MEP generation by mapping the corticomotor representations of single-pulse and paired-pulse TMS targeting SICF1 and SICF2 peaks in 14 participants (7 female). MEPs were recorded from two hand muscles and the spatial properties of each corticomotor map were analyzed. For both hand muscles, we found a consistent posterior shift of the center-of-gravity (CoG) for SICF maps compared to single-pulse maps, with a larger shift for SICF1. CoG displacement in the SICF1 map correlated with individual SICF1 latencies. Further, ADM maps consistently peaked more medially than FDI maps and paired-pulse TMS resulted in larger corticomotor maps than single-pulse TMS. This is the first study to show that circuits responsible for SICF have a more posterior representation in the precentral crown than those generating MEPs via single-pulse TMS. These findings indicate that paired-pulse TMS probing SICF1, SICF2, and single-pulse TMS engage overlapping but spatially distinct cortical circuits, adding further insights into the intricate organization of the human motor hand area. New & NoteworthySingle- and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is widely used to study corticomotor physiology in humans, but do they engage the same intracortical circuits? We compared the spatial properties of corticomotor maps elicited by single-pulse TMS to those elicited by paired-pulse short-latency intracortical facilitation (SICF). SICF maps consistently showed a posterior shift in center of gravity compared to single-pulse maps, suggesting that paired-pulse TMS engages cortical circuits that are spatially distinct from single-pulse TMS.

neuroscience↗

Transcranial magnetic stimulation of primary motor cortex elicits a site-specific immediate transcranial evoked potential

BackgroundTranscranial evoked potentials (TEPs) measured via electroencephalography (EEG) are widely used to study the cortical responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Immediate transcranial evoked potentials (i-TEPs) have been obscured by pulse and muscular artifacts. Thus, the TEP peaks that are commonly reported have latencies that are too long to be caused by direct excitation of cortical neurons. MethodsIn 14 healthy individuals, we recorded i-TEPs evoked by a single biphasic TMS pulse targeting the primary motor hand area (M1HAND) or parietal or midline control sites. Sampling EEG at 50 kHz enabled us to reduce the duration of the TMS pulse artifact to a few milliseconds, while minor adjustments of the TMS coil tilt or position enabled us to avoid cranial muscular twitches during the experiment. ResultsWe observed an early positive EEG deflection starting after approx. 2 ms combined with a series of peaks with an inter-peak interval of [~]1.1-1.4 ms in electrodes overlying the stimulated sensorimotor region. This multi-peak i-TEP response was only evoked by TMS of the M1HAND region and was modified by changes in stimulation intensity and current direction. DiscussionSingle-pulse TMS of the M1HAND evokes an immediate local multi-peak response at the cortical site of stimulation. Our results suggest that the observed i-TEP patterns are genuine cortical responses evoked by TMS caused by synchronized excitation of pyramidal neurons in the targeted precentral cortex. This notion needs to be corroborated in future studies, including further investigations into the potential contribution of instrumental or physiological artifacts.

neuroscience↗