Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Mack, W.

Publications and source records attributed to Mack, W..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Direction-Specific Effects of Biphasic Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Cortical and Cortico-spinal Excitability

Aims & MethodsTranscranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a well-established tool for inducing cortical excitation. However, the relevance of current direction on elicited effects is still incompletely understood. Combining TMS with electroencephalography (EEG) and electromyography (EMG) enables non-invasive analysis of evoked potentials both on cortical and peripheral level. In 23 healthy subjects, EEG and EMG responses to biphasic single pulses applied over the left motor cortex with anterior-posterior to posterior-anterior (AP-PA) or PA-AP current direction and 110% resting motor threshold (RMT) intensity were recorded and contrasted between the alternating phases. A cobot-assissted neuronavigation ensured stable coil-placement during the procedure. ResultsRMT was lower and EMG latency was shorter for AP-PA currents compared to PA-AP currents, whereas the EMG amplitude did not differ. For EEG responses, local and global evoked activity was higher for mid-components with PA-AP currents. P60 occurred earlier with PA-AP currents and N100 amplitude was higher in amplitude with AP-PA currents. The trial-wise MEP amplitude correlated significantly with P30 in the AP-PA and for both current directions with the N100 amplitude. ConclusionOur results highlight the directional sensitivity of M1 and the importance of further exploring the role of current direction in TMS protocols to better understand the cortical processes underlying cortico-cortical and cortico-spinal responses.

neuroscience↗

1 Hz rTMS Is Not Inherently Inhibitory: Current Direction Determines Aftereffects and Reliability

ObjectiveAftereffects of 1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) often differ within and between subjects and thus show low reliability. In this study we investigated the mean and individual aftereffects of 1 Hz rTMS using two opposing current directions, their reliability and potential influences of current direction, participants sex and state on cortical excitability modulations. MethodsThirteen healthy, right-handed participants underwent four experimental sessions separated by at least 7 days receiving 2000 pulses of suprathreshold 1 Hz rTMS over the primary motor cortex per session. Two sessions were conducted with an induced current direction of anterior-posterior - posterior-anterior (AP-PA) and two sessions with a PA-AP current direction. Before and after rTMS, 100 single TMS pulses were administered with the respective current direction and electromyography was recorded from the first dorsal interosseous. Questionnaires on demographic data and subjective ratings were completed during the experiment. ResultsLinear mixed effect model analysis revealed that 1 Hz rTMS induced an excitatory aftereffect when applied with the PA-AP current direction, and no aftereffect with AP-PA. There was a substantial interindividual variability with only three subjects showing an inhibition to 1 Hz rTMS overall. Also, current direction was the only predictor of rTMS aftereffect. Reliability values of these aftereffects were in the poor to moderate range. ConclusionsCurrent direction plays a crucial role in determining 1 Hz rTMS aftereffects. Reliability was found to be moderate at best. Additional to current direction, more factors need to be considered to tailor the 1 Hz rTMS aftereffects individually.

neuroscience↗