Search bioRxivSearch

Biology subjects

Määttä, J.

Publications and source records attributed to Määttä, J..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

The cognitive effects of a promised bonus do not depend on dopamine synthesis capacity

Reward motivation is known to enhance cognitive control. However, detrimental effects have also been observed, which have been attributed to overdosing of already high baseline dopamine levels by further dopamine increases elicited by reward cues. Aarts et al. (2014) indeed demonstrated, in 14 individuals, that reward effects depended on striatal dopamine synthesis capacity, measured with [18F]FMT-PET: promised reward improved Stroop control in low-dopamine individuals, while impairing it in high-dopamine individuals. Here, we aimed to assess this same effect in 44 new participants, who had previously undergone an [18F]DOPA-PET scan to quantify dopamine synthesis capacity. This sample performed the exact same rewarded Stroop paradigm as in the prior study. However, we did not find any correlation between reward effects on cognitive control and striatal dopamine synthesis capacity. The discrepancy between the current and our previous findings might reflect the use of different radiotracers for indexing dopamine synthesis capacity. STATEMENT OF RELEVANCEReward motivation is generally thought to enhance cognitive control, but paradoxical negative effects of rewards on cognitive control have also been observed. A previous PET study demonstrated that reward effects on Stroop control depended on baseline striatal dopamine synthesis capacity, indexed by uptake of the radiotracer [18F]FMT. The sample size is this study was very small for a between-subject correlational design. Replicating the exact same Stroop paradigm within a larger sample is therefore crucial to robustly establish the mechanistic link between incentive motivation and cognitive control and advancing our understanding of who chokes under pressure and why, a topic of great societal relevance today. The present study did not reveal any correlation between reward effects on cognitive control and striatal dopamine synthesis capacity, indexed with [18F]FDOPA-PET. Future studies might consider putative differential sensitivity of the radiotracer [18F]FMT and [18F]FDOPA, while also addressing other indices of dopamine transmission.

neuroscience

Dopamine Promotes Cognitive Effort by Biasing the Benefits Versus Costs of Cognitive Work

Stimulants like methylphenidate are increasingly used for cognitive enhancement, but precise mechanisms are unknown. We found that methylphenidate boosts willingness to expend cognitive effort by altering the benefit-to-cost ratio of cognitive work. Willingness to expend effort was greater for participants with higher striatal dopamine synthesis capacity, while methylphenidate and sulpiride - a selective D2 receptor antagonist - increased cognitive motivation more for participants with lower synthesis capacity. A sequential sampling model informed by momentary gaze revealed that decisions to expend effort are related to amplification of benefit-versus-cost information attended early in the decision process, while the effect of benefits is strengthened with higher synthesis capacity and by methylphenidate. These findings demonstrate that methylphenidate boosts the perceived benefits-versus-costs of cognitive effort by modulating striatal dopamine signaling. One Sentence SummaryStriatal dopamine increases cognitive effort by respectively amplifying and attenuating the subjective benefits and costs of cognitive control.

neuroscience