Biology subjects

Lukas, J.

Publications and source records attributed to Lukas, J..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2018

Social networks in the presence and absence of visual cues

We compared the social dynamics of two populations of the live-bearing Atlantic molly (Poecilia mexicana) that live in adjacent habitats with very different predator regimes: cave mollies that inhabit a low-predation environment inside a sulfidic cave with a low density of predatory water bugs (Belostoma sp.), and mollies that live directly outside the cave (henceforth called \"surface\" mollies) in a high-predation environment with a high density of fish-eating birds. We filmed the social interactions of marked fish in both environments and analysed their social network dynamics using a Markov model under two different fish densities of 12 and 6 fish per 0.36 m2. As expected, surface mollies spent overall much more time social than cave mollies. This difference in overall social time was a result of surface mollies being less likely to discontinue social contact (once they had a social partner) and being more likely to resume social contact (once alone) than cave mollies. Interestingly surface mollies were also less likely to leave a current social partner than cave mollies. At low density, mollies (in both environments) were expected to show reduced social encounters which should dramatically change their social dynamics. Surface mollies, however, displayed an ability to maintain their social dynamics at low density (primarily by reducing the convex polygon spanned by the group) which was not observed in cave mollies. Despite the fact that we only compared two populations, our data provide a mechanistic explanation for density compensations of social dynamics that have also been observed in other fish species and give an example of how comparisons between the social dynamics of different populations can be made that go beyond conventional network analyses.

animal behavior and cognition↗

bioRxiv2018

Guppies prefer to follow large (robot) leaders irrespective of own size

Body size is often assumed to determine how successful an individual can lead others with larger individuals being more likely to lead than smaller ones. However, direct evidence for such a relation is scarce. Furthermore, even if larger individuals are more likely to lead, body size correlates often with specific behavioral patterns (e.g., swimming capacity) and it is thus unclear whether larger individuals are more often followed than smaller ones because they are larger or because they behave in a certain way. To control for behavioral differences among differentially-sized leaders, we used biomimetic robotic fish - Robofish - of different sizes. Robofish is accepted as a conspecific by live guppies (Poecilia reticulata) and provides standardized behaviors irrespective of its size. We specifically asked whether larger leaders are preferentially followed when behavior is controlled for and whether the preferences of followers depend on their own body size or their risk taking behavior ( boldness). We found that live guppies followed larger Robofish leaders closer than smaller ones and this pattern was independent of the followers own body size as well as risk-taking behavior. This is the first study that shows a bigger is better pattern in leadership in shoaling fish that is fully independent of behavioral differences between differentially-sized leaders and followers own size and personality.

animal behavior and cognition↗

bioRxiv2018

Using a robotic fish to investigate individual differences in social responsiveness in the guppy

Responding towards the actions of others is one of the most important behavioral traits whenever animals of the same species interact. Mutual influences among interacting individuals may modulate the social responsiveness seen and thus makes it often difficult to study the level and variation of individuality in responsiveness. Here, biomimetic robots (BRs) that are accepted as conspecifics but controlled by the experimenter can be a useful tool. Studying the interactions of live animals with BRs allows pinpointing the live animals level of responsiveness by removing confounding mutuality. In this paper, we show that live guppies (Poecilia reticulata) exhibit consistent differences among each other in their responsiveness when interacting with a biomimetic fish robot - Robofish - and a live companion. It has been repeatedly suggested that social responsiveness correlates with other individual behavioral traits like risk-taking behavior ( boldness) or activity level. We tested this assumption in a second experiment. Interestingly, our detailed analysis of individual differences in social responsiveness using the Robofish, suggests that responsiveness is an independent trait, not part of a larger behavioral syndrome formed by boldness and activity.

animal behavior and cognition↗

bioRxiv2017

Mutational signatures reveal the role of RAD52 in p53-independent p21 driven genomic instability

BackgroundGenomic instability promotes evolution and heterogeneity of tumors. Unraveling its mechanistic basis is essential to design appropriate therapeutic strategies. In a recent study we reported an unexpected oncogenic property of p21WAF1/Cip1 showing that its chronic expression, in a p53-deficient environment, causes genomic instability by deregulating the replication licensing machinery.\n\nResultsExtending on this work we now demonstrate that p21WAF1/Cip1 can further fuel genomic instability by suppressing the repair capacity of low and high fidelity pathways that deal with nucleotide abnormalities. Consequently, fewer single nucleotide substitutions (SNSs) occur, while formation of highly deleterious DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) is enhanced, crafting a characteristic mutational signature landscape. Guided by the mutational signatures formed, we found at the mechanistic level that the DSBs were repaired by Rad52-dependent Break-Induced Replication (BIR) and Single-Strand Annealing (SSA). Conversely, the error-free synthesis-dependent strand annealing (SDSA) repair route was deficient. Surprisingly, Rad52 was activated transcriptionally in an E2F1-dependent manner, rather than post-translationally as is common for DNA repair factor activation.\n\nConclusionsOur results signify the importance of mutational signatures as guides to disclose the \"repair history\" leading to genomic instability. In this vein, following this approach we unveiled how chronic p21WAF1/Cip1 expression rewires the repair process, identifying Rad52 as a source of genomic instability and a candidate therapeutic target.

cancer biology↗