Biology subjects

Lobingier, B. T.

Publications and source records attributed to Lobingier, B. T..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2024

Retromer Opposes Opioid-Induced Downregulation of the Mu Opioid Receptor

The mu opioid receptor (MOR) is protected from opioid-induced trafficking to lysosomes and proteolytic downregulation by its ability to access the endosomal recycling pathway through its C-terminal recycling motif, LENL. MOR sorting towards the lysosome results in downregulation of opioid signaling while recycling of MOR to the plasma membrane preserves signaling function. However, the mechanisms by which LENL promotes MOR recycling are unknown, and this sequence does not match any known consensus recycling motif. Here we took a functional genomics approach with a comparative genome-wide screen design to identify genes which control opioid receptor expression and downregulation. We identified 146 hits including all three subunits of the endosomal Retromer complex. We show that the LENL motif in MOR is a novel Retromer recycling motif and that LENL is a necessary, sufficient, and conserved mechanism to give MOR access to the Retromer recycling pathway and protect MOR from agonist-induced downregulation to multiple clinically relevant opioids including fentanyl and methadone.

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2022

Profiling the diversity of agonist-selective effects on the proximal proteome environment of G protein-coupled receptors

The mu opioid receptor (OR), a prototypic member of the large G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family, represents an important target of therapeutic and abused drugs. To date, most of our understanding of OR activity has focused on signal transducers and regulatory molecules including G proteins, GPCR kinases, and beta-arrestins. Yet it is clear that signaling through the OR is coordinated by additional proteins recruited into the proximal interaction network of the activated receptor, which have largely remained invisible given the lack of technologies to interrogate these networks systematically. Here, we implement a quantitative proteomics pipeline leveraging the chemical diversity of OR agonists and APEX-based proximity labeling to investigate the protein networks that underlie OR signaling. We leverage a novel computational framework to extract subcellular location, trafficking, and functional partners of GPCR activity from the proximity labeling datasets. Applying this unbiased, systematic approach to the OR, we demonstrate that opioid agonists exert differences in the OR proximal proteome mediated by endocytosis and subsequent endosomal sorting, exemplified by VPS35 and COMMD3. Moreover, we identify two novel OR network components, EYA4 and KCTD12, that are recruited into the receptor proximal network irrespective of the activating ligand and independent of receptor trafficking but based on receptor-triggered G protein activation. We provide functional evidence that these network components form a previously unrecognized buffering system for G protein activity which broadly modulates cellular GPCR signaling.

systems biology↗

bioRxiv2017

Sec17 (α-SNAP) And An SM-Tethering Complex Control The Outcome Of SNARE Zippering In Vitro And In Vivo

Zippering of SNARE complexes spanning docked membranes is essential for most intracellular fusion events. Here we explore how SNARE regulators operate on discrete zippering states. The formation of a metastable trans-complex, catalyzed by HOPS and its SM subunit Vps33, is followed by subsequent zippering transitions that increase the probability of fusion. Operating independently of Sec18 catalysis, Sec17 either inhibits or stimulates SNARE-mediated fusion. If HOPS or Vps33 are absent, Sec17 inhibits fusion at an early stage. Thus, HOPS and Vps33 accelerate SNARE zippering, particularly in the presence of otherwise inhibitory Sec17. Once SNAREs are partially-zipped, Sec17 promotes fusion in either the presence or absence of HOPS -- but with faster kinetics when HOPS is absent. Our data further indicate that Sec17 promotes fusion both through its direct penetration of the membrane and by enhancing C-terminal SNARE zippering. In a working model, the interplay among Sec17, Sec18, SMs, and SNARE zippering can explain why SM proteins are indispensable for SNARE-mediated fusion in vivo.\n\nImpact statementSec17 is shown to have divergent effects on pre-fusion SNARE complex activity, depending on the state of SNARE zippering. HOPS, an SM-tether complex, controls the outcome of Sec17-SNARE engagement. The results suggest a coherent working model for SM activity in vivo.

biochemistry↗