Biology subjects

Livingston, N. M.

Publications and source records attributed to Livingston, N. M..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2022

Bursting Translation on Single mRNAs in Live Cells

Stochasticity has emerged as a mechanism to control gene expression. Much of this so-called "noise" has been attributed to bursting transcription. However, the stochasticity of translation has not similarly been investigated due to a lack of enabling imaging technologies. We developed techniques to track single mRNAs and their translation in live cells for hours, allowing measurement of previously uncharacterized translation dynamics. We applied genetic and pharmacological perturbations to control translation kinetics. Like transcription, translation is not a constitutive process but instead cycles between inactive and active states or "bursts". But unlike transcription, which is largely frequency modulated, complex structure in the 5-untranslated region alters burst amplitude. Bursting frequency can be controlled through cap-proximal sequences and trans-acting factors such as eIF4F. We coupled single molecule imaging with stochastic modeling to deduce the fundamental kinetic parameters of translational bursting, a new dimension of translational control. HighlightsO_LILong-term tracking of single mRNAs reveals multi-state, bursting translation C_LIO_LIStructure in the 5-untranslated region modulates translational burst amplitude C_LIO_LI5-cap proximal sequences modulate translational burst frequency C_LIO_LImTOR signaling adjusts translation bursting to respond to environmental cues C_LI

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2020

Puromycin reactivity does not accurately localize translation at the subcellular level

Puromycin is a tyrosyl-tRNA mimic that blocks translation by labeling and releasing elongating polypeptide chains from translating ribosomes. Puromycin has been used in molecular biology research for decades as a translation inhibitor. The development of puromycin antibodies and derivatized puromycin analogs has enabled the quantification of active translation in bulk and single-cell assays. More recently, in vivo puromycylation assays have become popular tools for localizing translating ribosomes in cells. These assays often use elongation inhibitors to purportedly inhibit the release of puromycin-labeled nascent peptides from ribosomes. Here, using in vitro and in vivo experiments, we demonstrate that, even in the presence of elongation inhibitors, puromycylated peptides are released and diffuse away from ribosomes. Puromycylation assays reveal subcellular sites, such as nuclei, where puromycylated peptides accumulate post-release and which do not necessarily coincide with sites of active translation. Our findings urge caution when interpreting puromycylation assays in the in vivo context.

biochemistry↗

bioRxiv2020

Dynamic regulation of translation quality control associated with ribosome stalling

Translation of problematic mRNA sequences induces ribosome stalling. Collided ribosomes at the stall site are recognized by cellular quality control machinery, resulting in dissociation of the ribosome from the mRNA and subsequent degradation of the nascent polypeptide and in some organisms, decay of the mRNA. However, the timing and regulation of these processes are unclear. We developed a SunTag-based reporter to monitor translation in real time on single mRNAs harboring difficult-to-translate poly(A) stretches. This reporter recapitulates previous findings in human cells that an internal poly(A) stretch reduces protein output [~]10-fold, while mRNA levels are relatively unaffected. Long-term imaging of translation indicates that poly(A)-containing mRNAs are robustly translated in the absence of detectable mRNA cleavage. However, quantification of ribosome density reveals a [~]3-fold increase in the number of ribosomes on poly(A)-containing mRNAs compared to a control mRNA, consistent with queues of many stalled ribosomes. Using single-molecule harringtonine runoff experiments, we observe the resolution of these queues in real-time by the cellular quality control machinery, and find that rescue is very slow compared to both elongation and termination. We propose that the very slow clearance of stalled ribosomes provides the basis for the cell to distinguish between transient and deleterious stalls, and that the human quality control apparatus predominantly targets the nascent protein rather than the mRNA.

biochemistry↗