Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Lindblom, N.

Publications and source records attributed to Lindblom, N..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Errors in peptide synthesis are a source of discrepancies in Aβ42 studies

Amyloid-{beta}42 (A{beta}42) aggregation is highly sensitive to experimental conditions, making reproducibility a persistent challenge in Alzheimers disease research. Among the many variables that influence aggregation, the impact of peptide production remains poorly understood. Direct comparison of recombinant and chemically synthesised A{beta}42 prepared under carefully controlled conditions reveals that, despite following similar aggregation mechanism and forming the same predominant fibril structures, synthetic A{beta}42 aggregates more slowly and exhibits reduced seeding efficiency. Consequently, synthetic A{beta}42 produces fewer oligomeric species and displays lower cellular toxicity. Mass spectrometric analyses identify low-abundance sequence imperfections introduced during peptide synthesis as the origin of these differences. By linking synthesis-derived imperfections to variations in A{beta}42 behaviour, this work reveals a previously underappreciated source of discrepancies in amyloid studies. In addition, we provide a framework for evaluating the impact of sequence impurities on biophysical studies that are sensitive to peptide composition.

biochemistry↗

Aβ Antibodies Target Not Only Amyloid Plaques But Also Distinct Brain Cells And Vessels

BackgroundAntibodies against amyloid-{beta} (A{beta}) are the only therapies capable of slowing cognitive decline and reducing A{beta} plaque burden in Alzheimers disease (AD). Yet the precise sites where antibodies engage A{beta} in the brain, and the mechanisms that drive A{beta} clearance, are not fully defined. Defining the A{beta} antibody engagement with A{beta} in brain is essential to understand how immunotherapy can be beneficial for AD. MethodsWe administered the well-establsihed N-terminal A{beta} antibody 6E10 via intrahippocampal (IH), cisterna magna (CM), or intraperitoneal (IP) injection in AD mouse models. N-terminal A{beta} antibodies were seen as most effective in AD mouse models. Antibody 6E10 was not only assessed in A{beta} plaques, but also examined in association with diverse brain cells and vascular compartments. Glymphatic dynamics were evaluated following A{beta} antibody treatment. ResultsAs expected, A{beta} antibody 6E10 bound to A{beta} plaques but remarkably also localized to vulnerable neurons, such as hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells, as well as microglia, astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, perivascular macrophages (PVMs), and blood vessels. Glymphatic function showed no significant alterations after antibody administration. ConclusionsA{beta} antibodies distribute not only to amyloid plaques but also to neurons, glial cells, and blood vessels. This study provides detailed localizations of antibody in the AD brain, offering valuable insights into cellular targets and spatial dynamics of A{beta} antibody-based immunotherapy.

neuroscience↗