Biology subjects

Lima, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Lima, S..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2020

Additive and non-additive epigenetic signatures of hybridisation between fish species with different mating systems

Hybridisation is a major source of evolutionary innovation. However, several prezygotic and postzygotic factors influence its likelihood and evolutionary outcomes. Differences in mating systems can have a major effect on the extent and direction of hybridisation and introgression. In plants, epigenetic mechanisms help to stabilize hybrid genomes and contribute to reproductive isolation, but the relationship between genetic and epigenetic changes in animal hybrids is unclear. We analysed the extent of a unique case of natural hybridisation between two genetically distant mangrove killifish species with different mating systems, Kryptolebias hermaphroditus (self-fertilising) and K. ocellatus (outcrossing), and the methylation patterns of their hybrids. Hybridisation rate between the species ranged between 14% and 26%. Although co-existing parental species displayed highly distinct genetic (microsatellites and SNPs) and methylation patterns (37,000 differentially methylated cytosines), our results indicate that F1 hybrids are viable and able to backcross with parental species. Hybrids had predominantly intermediate methylation patterns (88.5% of the sites) suggesting additive effects, as expected from hybridisation between genetically distant species. Differentially methylated cytosines between hybrids and both parental species (5,800) suggest that introgressive hybridisation may play a role in generating novel genetic and epigenetic variation which could lead to species diversification. We also found a small percentage of non-additive epigenetic effects which might act as an evolutionary bet-hedging strategy and increase fitness under environmental change.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2020

Temporal refuges differ between anthropogenic and natural top down pressures in a subordinate carnivore

Apex predators structure communities through consumptive and non-consumptive pathways. In the carnivore guild, this can result in a within-guild cascade through the suppression of mesocarnivores. As the top-down influences of apex predators wane due to human-driven declines, landscape level anthropogenic pressures are rising. Human impacts can be analogous to apex predators in that humans can drive increased mortality in both prey species and carnivores, and impact communities through indirect fear effects and food subsidies. Here, we evaluate whether anthropogenic top-down pressures can structure communities in a similar manner as apex predators in shaping the interactions of mesocarnivores. Specifically, we expect anthropogenic forces to induce comparable effects as occurrence of apex predators in driving spatiotemporal partitioning between two mesocarnivores. Using multiple camera-trap surveys, we compared the temporal response of a small carnivore, the raccoon (Procyon lotor), to the larger coyote (Canis latrans) at four sites across Michigan that represented opposing gradients of pressure from humans and apex predators. Contrary to our expectations, we found that raccoons shifted their activity pattern in response to coyotes at sites with higher anthropogenic pressures and exhibited no temporal response at sites with apex predators. Temporal shifts were characterized by raccoons being more diurnal in areas of high coyote activity. We conclude that despite superficial similarities, anthropogenic forces do not replace the function of native apex predators in structuring the mesocarnivore guild. As such, an intact and functioning native predator guild remains necessary to preserve spatiotemporal community structure, in natural and disturbed systems alike.

ecology↗