Biology subjects

Liegeois, R.

Publications and source records attributed to Liegeois, R..

10 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2023

Connectome embedding in multidimensional graph-invariant spaces

The topological organization of brain networks, or connectomes, can be quantified using graph theory. Here, we investigated brain networks in higher dimensional spaces defined by up to ten node-level graph theoretical invariants. Nodal invariants are intrinsic nodal properties which reflect the topological characteristics of the nodes with respect to the whole network, including segregation (e.g., clustering coefficient) and centrality (e.g., betweenness centrality) measures. Using 100 healthy unrelated subjects from the Human Connectome Project, we generated multiple types of connectomes (structural/functional networks and binary/weighted networks) and embedded the corresponding network nodes (brain regions) into multidimensional graph spaces defined by the invariants. First, we observed that nodal invariants are correlated between them (i.e., they carry similar network information) at a whole-brain and subnetwork level. Second, we conducted a machine learning analysis to test whether brain regions embedded in multidimensional graph spaces can be accurately classified into higher order (association, subcortical and cerebellar) and lower order (visual, somatomotor, attention) areas. Brain regions of higher order and lower order brain circuits were classified with an 80-87% accuracy in a 10-dimensional (10D) space. 10D graph metrics performed better than 2D and 3D graph metrics, and non-linear Gaussian kernels performed better than linear kernels. This suggests a non-linear brain network information gain in a high-dimensional graph space. Finally, we quantified the inter-subject Euclidean distance of each brain region embedded in the multidimensional graph space. The inter-individual distance was largest for regions of the default mode and frontoparietal networks, providing a new avenue for subject-specific network coordinates in a multidimensional space. To conclude, we propose a new framework for quantifying connectome features in multidimensional spaces defined by graph invariants, providing a new avenue for subject-specific network coordinates and inter-individual distance analyses.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2022

The arrow-of-time in neuroimaging time series identifies causal triggers of brain function

Moving from association to causal analysis of neuroimaging data is crucial to advance our understanding of brain function. The arrow-of-time (AoT), i.e., the known asymmetric nature of the passage of time, is the bedrock of causal structures shaping physical phenomena. However, almost all current time series metrics do not exploit this asymmetry, probably due to the difficulty to account for it in modelling frameworks. Here, we introduce an AoT-sensitive metric that captures the intensity of causal effects in multivariate time series, and apply it to high-resolution functional neuroimaging data. We find that that causal effects underlying brain function are more clearly localized in space and time than functional activity or connectivity, thereby allowing us to trace neural pathways recruited in different conditions. Overall, we provide a mapping of the causal brain that challenges the association paradigm of brain function.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2021

Assessment of temporal complexity in functional MRI between rest and task conditions

Dynamic models of cortical activity, as measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), have recently brought out important insights into the organization of brain function. In terms of temporal complexity, these hemodynamic signals have been shown to exhibit critical behaviour at the edge between order and disorder. In this study, we aimed to revisit the properties and spatial distribution of temporal complexity in resting state and task fMRI of 100 unrelated subjects from the Human Connectome Project (HCP). First, we compared two common choices of complexity measures (i.e., Hurst exponent versus multiscale entropy) and reported high similarity between them. Second, we investigated the influence of experimental paradigms and found high task-specific complexity. We considered four mental tasks in the HCP database for the analysis: Emotion, Working memory, Social, and Language. Third, we tailored a recently-proposed statistical framework that incorporates the structural connectome, to assess the spatial distribution of complexity measures. These results highlight brain regions including parts of the default mode network and cingulate cortex with significantly stronger complex behaviour than the rest of the brain, irrespective of task. In sum, temporal complexity measures of fMRI are reliable markers of the cognitive status.

bioengineering↗

bioRxiv2021

Precision dynamical mapping using topological data analysis reveals a unique hub-like transition state at rest

Even in the absence of external stimuli, neural activity is both highly dynamic and organized across multiple spatiotemporal scales. The continuous evolution of brain activity patterns during rest is believed to help maintain a rich repertoire of possible functional configurations that relate to typical and atypical cognitive phenomena. Whether these transitions or "explorations" follow some underlying arrangement or instead lack a predictable ordered plan remains to be determined. Here, using a precision dynamics approach, we aimed at revealing the rules that govern transitions in brain activity at rest at the single participant level. We hypothesized that by revealing and characterizing the overall landscape of whole brain configurations (or states) we could interpret the rules (if any) that govern transitions in brain activity at rest. To generate the landscape of whole-brain configurations we used Topological Data Analysis based Mapper approach. Across all participants, we consistently observed a rich topographic landscape in which the transition of activity from one state to the next involved a central hub-like "transition state." The hub topography was characterized as a shared attractor-like basin where all canonical resting-state networks were represented equally. The surrounding periphery of the landscape had distinct network configurations. The intermediate transition state and traversal through it via a topographic gradient seemed to provide the underlying structure for the continuous evolution of brain activity patterns at rest. In addition, differences in the landscape architecture were more consistent within than between subjects, providing evidence of idiosyncratic dynamics and potential utility in precision medicine.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2021

Structure-function interplay as signature for brain decoding and fingerprinting

Brain signatures of functional activity have shown promising results in both decoding brain states, meaning distinguishing between different tasks, and fingerprinting, that is identifying individuals within a large group. Importantly, these brain signatures do not account for the underlying brain anatomy on which brain function takes place. Structure-function coupling based on graph signal processing (GSP) has recently revealed a meaningful spatial gradient from unimodal to transmodal regions, on average in healthy subjects during resting-state. Here, we explore the potential of GSP to introduce new imaging-based biomarkers to characterize tasks and individuals. We used multimodal magnetic resonance imaging of 100 unrelated healthy subjects from the Human Connectome Project both during rest and seven different tasks and adopted a support vector machine classification approach for both decoding and fingerprinting, with various cross-validation settings. We found that structurefunction coupling measures allow accurate classifications for both task decoding and fingerprinting. In particular, key information for fingerprinting is found in the more liberal portion of functional signals, that is the one decoupled from structure. A network mainly involving cortico-subcortical connections showed the strongest correlation with cognitive traits, assessed with partial least square analysis, corroborating its relevance for fingerprinting. By introducing a new perspective on GSP-based signal filtering and FC decomposition, these results show that brain structure-function coupling provides a new class of signatures of cognition and individual brain organization at rest and during tasks. Further, they provide insights on clarifying the role of low and high spatial frequencies of the structural connectome, leading to new understanding of where key structure-function information for characterizing individuals can be found across the structural connectome graph spectrum. Highlights- The relation of brain function with the underlying structural wiring is complex - We propose new structure-informed graph signal processing (GSP) of functional data - GSP-derived features allow accurate task decoding and individual fingerprinting - Functional connectivity from filtered data is more unique to subject and cognition - The role of structurally aligned and liberal graph frequencies is elucidated

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2021

Interpreting Null Models of Resting-State Functional MRI

Null models are necessary for assessing whether a dataset exhibits non-trivial statistical properties. These models have recently gained interest in the neuroimaging community as means to explore dynamic properties of functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) time series. Interpretation of null-model testing in this context may not be straightforward because (i) null hypotheses associated to different null models are sometimes unclear and (ii) fMRI metrics might be trivial, i.e. preserved under the null hypothesis, and still be useful in neuroimaging applications. In this commentary, we review several commonly used null models of fMRI time series and discuss the interpretation of the corresponding tests. We argue that, while null-model testing allows for a better characterization of the statistical properties of fMRI time series and associated metrics, it should not be considered as a mandatory validation step to assess their relevance in neuroimaging applications.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2021

When makes you unique: temporality of the human brain fingerprint

The extraction of "fingerprints" from human brain connectivity data has become a new frontier in neuroscience. However, the time scales of human brain identifiability have not been addressed yet. In other words, what temporal features make our brains more "identifiable"? We here explore the dynamics of brain fingerprints (or brainprints) along two complementary axes: 1) what is the optimal time scale at which brainprints integrate sufficient information, 2) when best identification happens. Using dynamic identifiability, we show that the best identification emerges at longer time scales (~300s); however, short transient "bursts of identifiability" persist even when looking at shorter functional interactions. We find that these bursts of identifiability might be strongly associated with neuronal activity. Furthermore, we report evidence that different parts of connectome fingerprints relate to different time scales: i.e., more visual-somatomotor at short temporal windows, more frontoparietal-DMN driven by increasing temporal windows. Finally, using a meta-analytic approach, we show that there is a broad spectrum of associations between brainprints and behavior. At faster time scales, human brain fingerprints are linked to multisensory stimulation, eye movements, affective processing, visuospatial attention. At slower time scales instead, we find higher-cognitive functions, such as language and verbal semantics, awareness, declarative and working memory, social cognition. We hope that this first investigation of the temporality of the human brain fingerprint will pave the way towards a better understanding of what and when makes our brains unique.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2019

Global Signal Regression Strengthens Association between Resting-State Functional Connectivity and Behavior

Global signal regression (GSR) is one of the most debated preprocessing strategies for resting-state functional MRI. GSR effectively removes global artifacts driven by motion and respiration, but also discards globally distributed neural information and introduces negative correlations between certain brain regions. The vast majority of previous studies have focused on the effectiveness of GSR in removing imaging artifacts, as well as its potential biases. Given the growing interest in functional connectivity fingerprinting, here we considered the utilitarian question of whether GSR strengthens or weakens associations between resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) and multiple behavioral measures across cognition, personality and emotion. By applying the variance component model to the Brain Genomics Superstruct Project (GSP), we found that behavioral variance explained by whole-brain RSFC increased by an average of 47% across 23 behavioral measures after GSR. In the Human Connectome Project (HCP), we found that behavioral variance explained by whole-brain RSFC increased by an average of 40% across 58 behavioral measures, when GSR was applied after ICA-FIX de-noising. To ensure generalizability, we repeated our analyses using kernel regression. GSR improved behavioral prediction accuracies by an average of 64% and 12% in the GSP and HCP datasets respectively. Importantly, the results were consistent across methods. A behavioral measure with greater RSFC-explained variance (using the variance component model) also exhibited greater prediction accuracy (using kernel regression). A behavioral measure with greater improvement in behavioral variance explained after GSR (using the variance component model) also enjoyed greater improvement in prediction accuracy after GSR (using kernel regression). Furthermore, GSR appeared to benefit task performance measures more than self-reported measures. Since GSR was more effective at removing motion-related and respiratory-related artifacts, GSR-related increases in variance explained and prediction accuracies were unlikely the result of motion-related or respiratory-related artifacts. However, it is worth emphasizing that the current study focused on whole-brain RSFC, so it remains unclear whether GSR improves RSFC-behavioral associations for specific connections or networks. Overall, our results suggest that at least in the case for young healthy adults, GSR strengthens the associations between RSFC and most (although not all) behavioral measures. Code for the variance component model and ridge regression can be found here: https://github.com/ThomasYeoLab/CBIG/tree/master/stable_projects/preprocessing/Li2019_GSR. HighlightsO_LIGlobal signal regression improves RSFC-behavior associations C_LIO_LIGlobal signal regression improves RSFC-based behavioral prediction accuracies C_LIO_LIImprovements replicated across two large-scale datasets and methods C_LIO_LITask-performance measures enjoyed greater improvements than self-reported ones C_LIO_LIGSR beneficial even after ICA-FIX C_LI

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2018

Dynamic mode decomposition of resting-state and task fMRI

Component analysis is a powerful tool to identify dominant patterns of interactions in multivariate datasets. In the context of fMRI data, methods such as principal component analysis or independent component analysis have been used to identify the brain networks shaping functional connectivity (FC). Importantly, these approaches are static in the sense that they ignore the temporal information contained in fMRI time series. Therefore, the corresponding components provide a static characterization of FC. Building upon recent findings suggesting that FC dynamics encode richer information about brain functional organization, we use a dynamic extension of component analysis to identify dynamic modes (DMs) of fMRI time series. We demonstrate the feasibility and relevance of this approach using resting-state and motor-task fMRI data of 730 healthy subjects of the Human Connectome Project (HCP). In resting-state, dominant DMs have strong resemblance with classical resting-state networks, with an additional temporal characterization of the networks in terms of oscillatory periods and damping times. In motor-task conditions, dominant DMs reveal interactions between several brain areas, including but not limited to the posterior parietal cortex and primary motor areas, that are not found with classical activation maps. Finally, we identify two canonical components linking the temporal properties of the resting-state DMs with 158 behavioral and demographic HCP measures. Altogether, these findings illustrate the benefits of the proposed dynamic component analysis framework, making it a promising tool to characterize the spatio-temporal organization of brain activity.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2017

Interpreting Temporal Fluctuations In Resting-State Functional Connectivity MRI

Resting-state functional connectivity is a powerful tool for studying human functional brain networks. Temporal fluctuations in functional connectivity, i.e., dynamic functional connectivity (dFC), are thought to reflect dynamic changes in brain organization and non-stationary switching of discrete brain states. However, recent studies have suggested that dFC might be attributed to sampling variability of static FC. Despite this controversy, a detailed exposition of stationarity and statistical testing of dFC is lacking in the literature. This article seeks an in-depth exploration of these statistical issues at a level appealing to both neuroscientists and statisticians.\n\nWe first review the statistical notion of stationarity, emphasizing its reliance on ensemble statistics. In contrast, all FC measures depend on sample statistics. An important consequence is that the space of stationary signals is much broader than expected, e.g., encompassing hidden markov models (HMM) widely used to extract discrete brain states. In other words, stationarity does not imply the absence of brain states. We then expound the assumptions underlying the statistical testing of dFC. It turns out that the two popular frameworks - phase randomization (PR) and autoregressive randomization (ARR) - generate stationary, linear, Gaussian null data. Therefore, statistical rejection can be due to non-stationarity, nonlinearity and/or non-Gaussianity. For example, the null hypothesis can be rejected for the stationary HMM due to nonlinearity and non-Gaussianity. Finally, we show that a common form of ARR (bivariate ARR) is susceptible to false positives compared with PR and an adapted version of ARR (multivariate ARR).\n\nApplication of PR and multivariate ARR to Human Connectome Project data suggests that the stationary, linear, Gaussian null hypothesis cannot be rejected for most participants. However, failure to reject the null hypothesis does not imply that static FC can fully explain dFC. We find that first order AR models explain temporal FC fluctuations significantly better than static FC models. Since first order AR models encode both static FC and one-lag FC, this suggests the presence of dynamical information beyond static FC. Furthermore, even in subjects where the null hypothesis was rejected, AR models explain temporal FC fluctuations significantly better than a popular HMM, suggesting the lack of discrete states (as measured by resting-state fMRI). Overall, our results suggest that AR models are not only useful as a means for generating null data, but may be a powerful tool for exploring the dynamical properties of resting-state fMRI. Finally, we discuss how apparent contradictions in the growing dFC literature might be reconciled.

neuroscience↗