Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Lieberman, M. D.

Publications and source records attributed to Lieberman, M. D..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Making new connections: An fNIRS machine learning classification study of neural synchrony in the default mode network

Successfully making connections with others is crucial to navigating the social world and general well-being, yet little is known about connection formation and its neurocognitive underpinnings. Increasingly, neuroscientists use interpersonal neural synchrony within the default mode network (DMN) to measure when two or more people subjectively experience something in similar ways. DMN synchrony as seeing eye-to-eye is typically observed when multiple people are passively observing the same stimulus. In this study, we tested whether the same DMN synchrony as seeing eye-to-eye pattern holds during social interactions. We conducted a between-subject naturalistic experiment with 70 pairs of strangers engaged in either shallow or deep conversations while brain activity was measured with functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). Stranger dyads successfully formed connections, as indicated by composite connection scores. Replicating Kardas et al. (2021), those in the deep conversation condition felt more connected than those in the shallow conversation condition. DMN neural synchrony significantly predicted self-reported connection, with synchrony in the DMN subregions of medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and right temporoparietal junction (TPJ) each correlating significantly with connection. Using machine learning classification, we distinguished high-versus low-connection dyads based on DMN neural synchrony and the perceived depth of conversation with 64.5% accuracy across 1,000 iterations. This effect was primarily carried by right TPJ, which alone classified connection strength at 62.6% accuracy. We consider implications related to the growing loneliness crisis and the importance of understanding how social connections can be formed and fostered in an era of increased social isolation. Significance StatementThe current loneliness epidemic has serious consequences on health and well-being. Forming interpersonal connections is crucial for alleviating loneliness, yet little is known about its neural basis. Neural synchrony, a potential biological marker of people being on the same page, may be an indicator of social connection. We recorded brain activity as strangers engaged in a get-to-know-you conversation and found that neural synchrony--specifically within the default mode network (DMN) and subregions including medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), and right temporoparietal junction (TPJ)--predicted self-reported connection. Machine learning accurately classified high- and low-connection dyads based on DMN synchrony and perceived conversation depth. These findings suggest that deeper conversations, though more effortful, may foster stronger social bonds with measurable neural correlates.

neuroscience↗

Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and the Social Brain: Affect-Related Disruption of the Default and Mirror Networks

BackgroundSocial impairments, specifically in mentalizing and emotion recognition, are common and debilitating symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Despite this, little is known about the neural underpinnings of these impairments, as there have been no published neuroimaging investigations of social inference in PTSD. MethodsTrauma-exposed veterans with and without PTSD (N = 20 each) performed the Why/How social inference task during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The PTSD group had two fMRI sessions, between which they underwent affect labeling training. We probed the primary networks of the "social brain"--the default mode network (DMN) and mirror neuron system (MNS)--by examining neural activity evoked by mentalizing and action identification prompts, which were paired with emotional and non-emotional targets. ResultsHyperactivation to emotional stimuli differentiated PTSD patients from controls, correlated with symptom severity, and predicted training outcomes. Critically, these effects were generally non-significant for non-emotional stimuli. PTSD-related effects were widely distributed throughout DMN and MNS. Effects were strongest in regions associated with the dorsal attention, ventral attention, and frontoparietal control networks. Unexpectedly, effects were non-significant in core affect regions. ConclusionsThe array of social cognitive processes subserved by DMN and MNS may be inordinately selective for emotional stimuli in PTSD. This selectivity may be tightly linked with attentional processes, as effects were strongest in attention-related regions. Putatively, we propose an attentional account of social inference dysfunction in PTSD, in which affective attentional biases drive widespread affect-selectivity throughout the social brain. This account aligns with numerous findings of affect-biased attentional processing in PTSD.

neuroscience↗