Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Li, Y.-f.

Publications and source records attributed to Li, Y.-f..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Unveiling Cognitive Processes in Mice through Reinforcement Learning Models in the FST and TST

Simple behavioral tests like the forced swim test (FST) and tail suspension test (TST) are widely used to assess depression-like behaviors in rodents, primarily measuring immobility time. However, this approach oversimplifies behavioral readouts and overlooks the cognitive processes driving behavior, leaving the relationship between increased immobility and cognitive biases unclear. Here, we developed the SwimStruggleTracker (SST) to extract fine-grained behavioral trajectories and integrate computational modeling to methodically analyze behavior. Our findings reveal that behavior in the FST and TST follows reinforcement learning principles involving learning, consequence perception, and decision-making. Notably, the cognitive processes underlying behavior differ between the two tests, challenging the assumption that they are interchangeable for cross-validation. Regression analyses identify distinct behavior phases: early behavior is primarily influenced by learning-related factors, while later stages are more affected by consequence sensitivity. These findings suggest traditional analyses focusing final minutes may underestimate the role of learning and overemphasize consequence sensitivity. MotivationThe forced swim test (FST) and tail suspension test (TST) are among the most widely used paradigms for assessing depression-like behaviors in rodents. Yet, traditional analyses typically quantify only immobility during the final minutes, discarding rich temporal structure in the data and hindering efforts to uncover the cognitive mechanisms underlying these behaviors. To address this gap, we developed an automated tool that captures behavioral trajectories with fine temporal resolution and integrates computational modeling to dissect the cognitive processes driving behavior. Using this approach, we demonstrate that the FST and TST engage overlapping but partially distinct cognitive processes, and that the dominant cognitive components shift across different stages of the tests. HighlightsO_LISwimStruggleTracker (SST) accurately rejects passive movements, such as pendulum-like motion. C_LIO_LIReinforcement learning models capture the behavioral dynamics of mice in the FST and TST. C_LIO_LIDistinct winning models indicate that the FST and TST engage partially dissociable cognitive processes. C_LIO_LILearning factors dominate early stages, whereas consequence-sensitivity factors dominate later stages. C_LI

animal behavior and cognition↗

Autophagy-associated Production of Antimicrobial Peptides hBD1 and LL37 Exhibits Anti-Bacillus Calmette-Guerin Effects in Lung Epithelial Cells.

Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) constitute important groups of bactericidal polypeptides against various microorganisms that exhibit their anti-bacteria activity through cleavage of precursor peptides into the active form of 50-100 amino acids in length. Various AMP cleavage mechanisms have been reported in different cell types; however, those in Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB)-infected lung epithelial cells remain unknown. In the present study, we found that MTB-infected lung epithelial cells expressed high level of the AMPs hBD1 and LL37 to kill intracellular MTB as the first-line immune barrier against MTB infection. Notably, their production in the lung epithelial cells was closely related to the function of autophagosomes and lysosomes. Experimental induction of autophagy in lung epithelial cells could enhance the expression of active hBD1 and LL37 at the post-transcriptional level, whereas silencing of these two active AMPs could decrease the bactericidal effect of autophagy. These findings indicated that cleavage of peptide precursors to form active AMPs might constitute a previously unrecognized antibacterial mechanism of autophagy. Author summaryLM and RW conceived and designed the experiments; RW performed the experiments and analyzed the data; QW analyzed the data and contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; HL performed the experiments; XZ, JY, YL and ZH analyzed the data. LM and RW drafted the manuscript.

immunology↗