Biology subjects

Levinson, M. A.

Publications and source records attributed to Levinson, M. A..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2024

FAIRSCAPE: An Evolving AI-readiness Framework for Biomedical Research

ObjectiveBiomedical datasets intended for use in AI applications require packaging with rich pre-model metadata to support model development that is explainable, ethical, epistemically grounded and FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable). MethodsWe developed FAIRSCAPE, a digital commons environment, using agile methods, in close alignment with the team developing the AI-readiness criteria and with the Bridge2AI data production teams. Work was initially based on an existing provenance-aware framework for clinical machine learning. We incrementally added RO-Crate data+metadata packaging and exchange methods, client-side packaging support, provenance visualization, and support metadata mapped to the AI-readiness criteria, with automated AI-readiness evaluation. LinkML semantic enrichment and Croissant ML-ecosystem translations were also incorporated. ResultsThe FAIRSCAPE framework generates, packages, evaluates, and manages critical pre-model AI-readiness and explainability information with descriptive metadata and deep provenance graphs for biomedical datasets. It provides ethical, schema, statistical, and semantic characterization of dataset releases, licensing and availability information, and an automated AI-readiness evaluation across all 28 AI-readiness criteria. We applied this framework to successive, large-scale releases of multimodal datasets, progressively increasing dataset AI-readiness to full compliance. ConclusionFAIRSCAPE enables AI-readiness in biomedical datasets using standard metadata components and has been used to establish this pattern across a major, multimodal NIH data generation program. It eliminates early-stage opacity apparent in many biomedical AI applications and provides a basis for establishing end-to-end AI explainability.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2024

Cell Maps for Artificial Intelligence: AI-Ready Maps of Human Cell Architecture from Disease-Relevant Cell Lines

This article describes the Cell Maps for Artificial Intelligence (CM4AI) project and its goals, methods, standards, current datasets, software tools, status, and future directions. CM4AI is the Functional Genomics Data Generation Project in the U.S. National Institute of Healths (NIH) Bridge2AI program. Its overarching mission is to produce ethical, AI-ready datasets of cell architecture, inferred from multimodal data collected for human cell lines, to enable transformative biomedical AI research.

systems biology↗

bioRxiv2021

Evidence Graphs: Supporting Transparent and FAIR Computation, with Defeasible Reasoning on Data, Methods and Results

IntroductionTransparency of computation is a requirement for assessing the validity of computed results and research claims based upon them; and it is essential for access to, assessment, and reuse of computational components. These components may be subject to methodological or other challenges over time. While reference to archived software and/or data is increasingly common in publications, a single machine-interpretable, integrative representation of how results were derived, that supports defeasible reasoning, has been absent. MethodsWe developed the Evidence Graph Ontology, EVI, in OWL 2, with a set of inference rules, to provide deep representations of supporting and challenging evidence for computations, services, software, data, and results, across arbitrarily deep networks of computations, in connected or fully distinct processes. EVI integrates FAIR practices on data and software, with important concepts from provenance models, and argumentation theory. It extends PROV for additional expressiveness, with support for defeasible reasoning. EVI treats any computational result or component of evidence as a defeasible assertion, supported by a DAG of the computations, software, data, and agents that produced it. ResultsWe have successfully deployed EVI for large-scale predictive analytics on clinical time-series data. Every result may reference its evidence graph as metadata, which can be extended when subsequent computations are executed. DiscussionEvidence graphs support transparency and defeasible reasoning on results. They are first-class computational objects and reference the datasets and software from which they are derived. They support fully transparent computation, with challenge and support propagation. The EVI approach may be extended to include instruments, animal models, and critical experimental reagents.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2021

Discovery of signatures of fatal neonatal illness in vital signs using highly comparative time-series analysis

ObjectiveTo seek new signatures of illness in heart rate and oxygen saturation vital signs from Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), we implemented highly comparative time-series analysis to discover features of all-cause mortality in the next 7 days. DesignWe collected 0.5Hz heart rate and oxygen saturation vital signs of infants in the University of Virginia NICU from 2009 to 2019. We applied 4988 algorithmic operations from 11 mathematical families to random daily ten-minute segments. We clustered the results and selected a representative from each, and examined multivariable logistic regression models. SettingNeonatal ICU Patients5957 NICU infants; 205 died. Measurements and main results3555 operations were usable; 20 cluster medoids held more than 81% of the information. A multivariable model had AUC 0.83. Five algorithms outperformed others: moving threshold, successive increases, surprise, and random walk. We computed provenance of the computations and constructed a software library with links to the data. ConclusionsHighly comparative time-series analysis revealed new vital sign measures to identify NICU patients at the highest risk of death in the next week.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2020

FAIRSCAPE: A Framework for FAIR and Reproducible Biomedical Analytics

Results of computational analyses require transparent disclosure of their supporting resources, while the analyses themselves often can be very large scale and involve multiple processing steps separated in time. Evidence for the correctness of any analysis should include not only a textual description, but also a formal record of the computations which produced the result, including accessible data and software with runtime parameters, environment, and personnel involved. This article describes FAIRSCAPE, a reusable computational framework, enabling simplified access to modern scalable cloud-based components. FAIRSCAPE fully implements the FAIR data principles and extends them to provide fully FAIR Evidence, including machine-interpretable provenance of datasets, software and computations, as metadata for all computed results. The FAIRSCAPE microservices framework creates a complete Evidence Graph for every computational result, including persistent identifiers with metadata, resolvable to the software, computations, and datasets used in the computation; and stores a URI to the root of the graph in the results metadata. An ontology for Evidence Graphs, EVI (https://w3id.org/EVI), supports inferential reasoning over the evidence. FAIRSCAPE can run nested or disjoint workflows and preserves provenance across them. It can run Apache Spark jobs, scripts, workflows, or user-supplied containers. All objects are assigned persistent IDs, including software. All results are annotated with FAIR metadata using the evidence graph model for access, validation, reproducibility, and re-use of archived data and software.

bioinformatics↗