Glutamatergic Supramammillary Nucleus Neurons Promote Active Coping to Stress
Threat-response neural circuits are conserved across species and play roles in normal behavior and psychiatric diseases. Maladaptive changes in these neural circuits contribute to stress, mood, and anxiety disorders. Active coping in response to stressors is a psychosocial factor associated with resilience against stress-induced mood and anxiety disorders. The neural circuitry underlying active coping is poorly understood, but the functioning of these circuits could be key for overcoming anxiety and related disorders. The supramammillary nucleus (SuM) has been suggested to be engaged by threat. SuM has many projections and contains a poorly understood diversity of populations. We identified a unique population of glutamatergic SuM neurons (SuMVGLUT2+::POA) based on projection to the preoptic area of the hypothalamus (POA) and found SuMVGLUT2+::POA neurons have extensive arborizations. SuMVGLUT2+::POA neurons project to brain areas that mediate various features of the stress and threat responses including the paraventricular nucleus thalamus (PVT), periaqueductal gray (PAG), and the habenula (Hb). Thus, SuMVGLUT2+::POA neurons are positioned as a hub, connecting to areas implicated in regulating stress responses. Here we report SuMVGLUT2+::POA neurons are recruited by diverse threatening stressors, and recruitment of SuMVGLUT2+::POA neurons correlated with active coping behaviors. We found that selective photoactivation of the SuMVGLUT2+::POA population drove aversion but not anxiety like behaviors. Activation of SuMVGLUT2+::POA neurons in the absence of acute stressors evoked active coping like behaviors and drove instrumental behavior (selective port activations) (Figure 6). Also, activation of SuMVGLUT2+::POA neurons was sufficient to convert passive coping strategies to active behaviors during acute stress. In contrast, we found activation of GABAergic (VGAT+) SuM neurons (SuMVGAT+) neurons did not alter drive aversion or active coping, but termination of photostimulation was followed by increased mobility in the forced swim test. These findings establish a new node in stress response circuitry that has projections to many brain areas, evokes flexible active coping behaviors, and offers new opportunities for furthering our neurobiological understanding of stress. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=134 HEIGHT=200 SRC="FIGDIR/small/507167v4_fig6.gif" ALT="Figure 6"> View larger version (30K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@717f84org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@16ad323org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@4ba5b6org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@6c811e_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOFigure 6.C_FLOATNO SuMVGLUT2+::POA neurons can drive instrumental action-outcome operant behavior (A) Schematic of injection and implant in VGLUT2+ Cre mice and paradigm of testing in 10-minute trials with four days before a progressive ratio (PR) trial on day five. (B) Illustration of the testing paradigm and set up. 10 Hz photostimulation was applied during the trials. Activation of the active port triggered the house light and paused stimulation for 10 seconds. Also shown is the progressive ratio used with number of required port activations per reward on vertical axis and reward number on the horizontal. (C) Cre+ mice (n=11) activated the active port triggering significantly (****p<0.0001) more pauses in stimulation than Cre- mice (n=11) mice on all four days of testing. (D) Cre+ mice activated the port significantly (****p<0.0001, ***p<0.001) more than the Cre- mice on all four trials. (E) The time to first activation of the active port was significantly (*p=0.046) different during the first trial, and Cre+ mice activated the active port significantly (**p<0.01, **p<0.01, **p=0.034) faster on subsequent trials. (F) On the fifth day after four 10-minute trials, mice were tested for 30 minutes using a progressive ratio. Cre+ performed significantly (****p<0.001) more active port activations than Cre- mice and activated the inactive port significantly more (**p=0.001) times. Cre+ mice also triggered significantly (****p<0.001) more pauses in photostimulation than Cre- mice. (G) Individual data for a representative (n=7) cohort of Cre+ mice showing cumulative active port activations as a function of time during the progressive ratio test show on-going engagement of the active port throughout the 30-minute trial. (H) The cumulative pauses in photostimulation (rewards) earned as a function of time during the progressive ratio trial are shown for individual Cre+ mice. Mice earned between 7 and 11 pause rewards during the trial. All data plotted as means {+/-}SEM. C_FIG