Biology subjects

Legagneux, P.

Publications and source records attributed to Legagneux, P..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2025

Experimental and field evidence indicate that islet-nesting tundra birds experience reduced nest predation and benefit indirectly from high snow goose densities

Landscape features can shape the occurrence and strength of predator-prey interactions by influencing predation risk and prey distribution. In the High Arctic, some bird species select nesting sites with physical features that limit the access by their main terrestrial predator, the arctic fox, though these features do not always provide full protection. We investigated how nest microhabitat characteristics and prey availability modulate nest survival in tundra birds that select pond and lake islets as breeding sites. Over four summers, we analyzed the survival of 132 cackling goose and 55 glaucous gull nests located on islets or on pond and lake shores within a 150 km2 area occupied by a snow goose colony on Bylot Island, Nunavut, Canada. We also analyzed survival of 537 artificial nests deployed over three summers. We found that islets act as partial prey refuges, with higher nest survival rates on islets than on pond and lake shores. Nest survival generally increased with islet distance from shore, but we found little evidence of this effect for cackling geese and glaucous gulls, which avoided nesting on islets near shore. Moreover, water depth surrounding islets had little to no influence for any nest type. Nest mortality was much higher in a year with relatively low snow goose nest density, suggesting a short-term positive indirect effect of this colonial nesting bird on species nesting on islets. Since the arctic fox was virtually the sole predator of artificial nests, our findings indicate that annual variation in nest survival on islets were driven by a shift in fox foraging behavior in response to changes in prey availability across the landscape. Our study, which integrates multi-year monitoring and field experiments, highlights the interplay between microhabitat selection and predator-multi-prey dynamics in the arctic tundra.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2025

Predicting space use patterns of a territorial top predator: from individual movement decisions to Arctic fox space use

O_LIPredicting animal space use could greatly improve our understanding and forecasting of ecological processes. Despite growing interest, the development of predictive space use models amenable to the integration of spatial processes into ecological frameworks have yet to reach their full potential. C_LIO_LIUsing high-resolution tracking data collected at 4-minute intervals from 26 Arctic foxes over five years, we developed a predictive space use model based on a step-selection approach. We assessed fine-scale habitat selection in relation to prey distribution, landscape features, and ecological constraints such as central place foraging and territoriality. We then used these results to build an agent-based model simulating fox space use and evaluated its ability to reproduce observed space use patterns. C_LIO_LIStep-selection analyses confirmed that fox movements were driven by habitat type, goose nest density, distance to den, and avoidance of distance to the home range boundary. Agent-based simulations closely matched empirical tracking data and accurately forecasted fox space use, even for individuals excluded from model parameterization. C_LIO_LIBy developing a predictive model of predator space-use, our study provides a foundation for incorporating additional components of the predation sequence and contributes to more spatially informed approaches in predator-prey ecology. C_LI

ecology↗

bioRxiv2025

Timing matters: phenological constraints and predation shape Arctic community structure

Top-down and bottom-up controls of animal populations are key elements of niche and coexistence theories, but there is still little empirical evidence on how these forces determine species distribution and community assemblies. In Arctic ecosystems, spring snowmelt sets the timing and duration of the snow-free period, thereby controlling food availability, while predation often imposes additional constraints on prey species. The relative importance of these abiotic and biotic filters on distribution is also susceptible to vary with body size. Using 10 years of high-resolution data on all major members of an Arctic vertebrate community and their shared predator, we tested how snowmelt timing interacts with predation to shape species occurrence and community structure. Species occurrence declined with later snowmelt dates, with larger-bodied species being particularly constrained by short snow-free periods. Predation further modulated species occurrence, with responses varying according to body mass. Our findings highlight the combined influence of the phenology of food availability and predation as important filters shaping local community structure. Building on species contrasted responses, we propose a conceptual framework for how phenological constraints and predation jointly shape community assembly in highly seasonal environments.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2024

Integrating predator energetic balance, risk-taking behavior and microhabitat in functional response: Untangling indirect interactions in a multispecies vertebrate community

1O_LIPredator-prey interactions in natural communities are complex, with predators often exploiting multiple prey types and generating indirect interactions among them. Ecological theory has traditionally modeled these interactions using functional responses models which are based on foraging rates, not energy transfers. This approach overlooks how the energy acquisition rate of a predator can alter its behavior and, in turn, the strength of species interactions. C_LIO_LIHere, we integrate predator energetics into a functional response model to represent trade-offs predators face when foraging on prey that vary in risk and abundance across heterogeneous landscapes. We compared model predictions to 20 years of prey species density and reproductive success data. The mechanistic model was parameterized for an Arctic tundra vertebrate community, where the Arctic fox feeds on cyclic lemmings and eggs of sandpipers (non-risky prey) and gulls (risky prey that often nest in partial refuge like islands). In this system, predator-mediated interactions generate apparent mutualism between lemmings and birds, but its strength varies between species, and the mechanisms underlying this interaction remain unclear. C_LIO_LIWe found that fox energetic balance was highly related to lemming density, with a threshold of 89 lemmings per km2 required for a positive energetic balance. Model-predicted gull nest acquisition rates were lowest on islands when the energetic balance of foxes was positive, and highest for nests on the shore when foxes were in deficit. The model that incorporated predator risk-taking behavior and energetic balance produced variation in gull hatching success that most closely matched empirical observations. C_LIO_LIWe documented for the first time that a shift in predator energetic balance, triggering changes in attack and capture probabilities on a risky prey, can be a key mechanism underlying the apparent mutualism between lemmings and gulls. In contrast, for non-risky prey, the indirect effect can be essentially driven by changes in predator movement. These findings highlight how prey characteristics can lead to different mechanisms behind similar indirect interactions. C_LIO_LITaken together, our results indicate that mechanistic models integrating species traits, landscape features, and energy-dependent behavioral adjustments can improve our ability to quantify interaction strengths in natural communities. C_LI

ecology↗