Leegwater, H. | Search bioRxiv

bioRxiv2026

Multi-omics characterization of breast cancer metabolism identifies new metabolic targets

Breast cancer cells undergo metabolic reprogramming to support proliferation and metastasis, but these alterations are heterogeneous. To systematically assess this heterogeneity under controlled conditions, we profiled 31 intracellular polar metabolites and 50 amines, together with exchange rates of 57 amines, in a panel of 51 breast cancer cell lines spanning diverse phenotypes. These data were integrated with lipidomics and transcriptomics. Multi-omics factor analysis identified metabolic signatures linked to proliferation and to differences between luminal, HER2-positive, basal A, and basal B cell lines, overlapping with an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition phenotype. Fast-proliferating, aggressive cell lines showed increased uptake of essential amino acids and altered nucleotide levels, while heterogeneity in glutamine metabolism was mainly driven the subtype. This was partially associated with heterogeneous expression of metabolite transporters. To test the functional relevance, 67 metabolic genes were silenced in Hs578T using siRNA, and effects on proliferation and migration were measured by a sulforhodamine B assay, live-cell imaging, and a random cell migration assay. This resulted in 34 knockdowns that reduced proliferation and 20 reduced migration, with strong effects for the glycosyltransferases EXT1 and EXT2, nucleotide metabolism genes GART and HPRT1, and metabolite transporters SLC7A1, SLC7A11, and SLC16A3. These findings highlight phenotype-specific metabolic dependencies and identify candidate drug targets in aggressive breast cancer.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2024

Normalization strategies for lipidome data in cell line panels

Sample collection can significantly affect measurements of relative lipid concentrations in cell line panels, hiding intrinsic biological properties of interest between cell lines. Most quality control steps in lipidomic data analysis focus on controlling technical variation. Correcting for the total amount of biological material remains an additional challenge for cell line panels. Here, we investigated how we can normalize lipidomic data acquired from multiple cell lines to correct for differences in sample biomass. We studied how commonly used data normalization and transformation steps during analysis influenced the resulting lipid data distributions. We compared normalization by biological properties such as cell count or total protein concentration, to statistical and data-based approaches, such as median, mean, or probabilistic quotient-based normalization and used intraclass correlation to estimate how similarity between replicates changed after normalization. Normalizing lipidomic data by cell count improved similarity between replicates, but only for a study with cell lines with similar morphological phenotypes. For cell line panels with multiple morphologies collected over a longer time, neither cell count nor protein concentration was sufficient to increase the similarity of lipid abundances between replicates of the same cell line. Data-based normalizations increased these similarities, but also created artifacts in the data caused by a bias towards the large and variable lipid class of triglycerides. This artifact was reduced by normalizing for the abundance of only structural lipids. We conclude that there is a delicate balance between improving the similarity between replicates and avoiding artifacts in lipidomic data and emphasize the importance of an appropriate normalization strategy in studying biological phenomena using lipidomics.

bioinformatics↗