Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Ledergerber, J.

Publications and source records attributed to Ledergerber, J..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Accelerating multi-objective VHH discovery via integrated high-throughput selection and AlphaFold3-guided structure prediction

Discovering therapeutic antibodies that bind multiple related targets with high affinity and favourable biophysical properties remains challenging and resource intensive. For snakebite antivenoms, this challenge is critical as treatments must neutralise toxins across multiple snake species. We developed a pipeline combining high-throughput yeast screening, deep sequencing, and AlphaFold3 structure prediction to rapidly identify poly-specific variable domains of heavy-chain-only antibodies (VHHs) against long-chain -neurotoxins. Multiplexed yeast display screening generated a dataset of diverse candidates with varying binding specificities. AlphaFold3-generated VHH-toxin complex predictions enabled structure-based prioritisation that accurately predicted poly-specific binders targeting conserved epitopes across multiple toxins. These structural insights enabled computational optimisation of both affinity and solubility without disrupting target recognition. Experimental validation confirmed improved variants maintained broad specificity across toxins. This integrated approach accelerates multi-objective antibody discovery by predicting which candidates will bind multiple targets before extensive laboratory testing, providing a generalisable strategy applicable beyond antivenoms to any therapeutic requiring broad target coverage.

bioengineering↗

A Comparative Study of Protein Structure Prediction Tools for Challenging Targets: Snake Venom Toxins

Protein structure determination is a critical aspect of biological research, enabling us to understand protein function and potential applications. Recent advances in deep learning and artificial intelligence have led to the development of several protein structure prediction tools, such as AlphaFold2 and ColabFold. However, their performance has primarily been evaluated on well-characterised proteins, and comparisons using proteins with poor reference templates are lacking. In this study, we evaluated three modelling tools on their prediction of over 1000 snake venom toxin structures with no reference templates. Our findings show that AlphaFold2 (AF2) performed the best across all assessed parameters. We also observed that ColabFold (CF) only scored slightly worse than AF2, while being computationally less intensive. All tools struggled with regions of intrinsic disorder, such as loops and propeptide regions, and performed well in predicting the structure of functional domains. Overall, our study highlights the importance of exercising caution when working with proteins that have poor reference templates, are large, and contain flexible regions. Nonetheless, leveraging computational structure prediction tools can provide valuable insights into the modelling of protein interactions with different targets and reveal potential binding sites, active sites, and conformational changes, as well as into the design of potential molecular binders for reagent, diagnostic, or therapeutic purposes. StatementRecent advances in machine learning have led to the development of new protein structure prediction tools. However, these tools have mainly been tested on well-known proteins and their performance on proteins without known templates is unclear. This study evaluated the performance of three tools on over 1000 snake venom toxins. We found that while caution is required when studying poorly characterised proteins, these tools offer valuable opportunities to understand protein function and applications.

bioinformatics↗