Biology subjects

Lapp, H.

Publications and source records attributed to Lapp, H..

6 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Modeling gene regulatory perturbations via deep learning from high-throughput reporter assays

Assessing likely variant effects on phenotypes is of critical importance in diagnostic settings, and while much progress has been made in interpreting genic mutations based on our understanding of coding sequence, noncoding variants can be much more challenging to reliably interpret based on DNA sequence alone. High-throughput reporter assays such as STARR-seq and MPRA have shown utility in experimentally measuring regulatory effects of noncoding variants present in samples but provide no readout for variants not present in the assay inputs. However, whole-genome reporter assays provide copious data that can be used to train predictive models for prioritizing variants not directly observed in the experiment. We describe a retrainable predictive modeling framework, BlueSTARR, for this task, and present results of training several models with this framework on whole-genome STARR-seq data from two cell lines and one drug treatment. Using these models, we uncover a global signature across the human genome consistent with purifying selection against both loss-of-function and gain-of-function regulatory variants, with the latter showing a significant bias consistent with selection against gains of cis regulatory function in closed chromatin proximal to genes. By testing the model on synthetic enhancers with binding motifs for transcription factors GR and AP-1, we find that when trained on drug perturbation data, the model is able to learn distance-dependent and treatment-dependent binding patterns and their resulting reporter gene activation. These results demonstrate that lightweight, easily retrainable models such as ours have utility in probing latent signals present in novel experimental data. Finally, we find only modest differences in performance between different deep-learning architectures when trained on this single data modality, and while somewhat greater predictive accuracy can be achieved with much larger models trained at great expense on many terabytes of data, there is still copious room for improvement even for industrial strength, state-of-the-art models.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2023

rphenoscate: An R package for semantic-aware evolutionary analyses of anatomical traits

O_LIOrganismal anatomy is a complex hierarchical system of interconnected anatomical entities often producing dependencies among multiple morphological characters. Ontologies provide a formalized and computable framework for representing and incorporating prior biological knowledge about anatomical dependencies in models of trait evolution. Further, ontologies offer new opportunities for assembling and working with semantic representations of morphological data. C_LIO_LIIn this work we present a new R package--rphenoscate--that enables incorporating ontological knowledge in evolutionary analyses and exploring semantic patterns of morphological data. In conjunction with rphenoscape it also allows for assembling synthetic phylogenetic character matrices from semantic phenotypes of morphological data. We showcase the new package functionalities with three data sets from bees and fishes. C_LIO_LIWe demonstrate that ontology knowledge can be employed to automatically set up ontologyinformed evolutionary models that account for trait dependencies in the context of stochastic character mapping. We also demonstrate how ontology annotations can be explored to interrogate patterns of morphological evolution. Finally, we demonstrate that synthetic character matrices assembled from semantic phenotypes retain most of the phylogenetic information of the original data set. C_LIO_LIOntologies will become an increasingly important tool not only for enabling prior anatomical knowledge to be integrated into phylogenetic methods but also to make morphological data FAIR compliant--a critical component of the ongoing phenomics revolution. Our new package offers key advancements toward this goal. C_LI

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2022

Assessing Bayesian Phylogenetic Information Content of Morphological Data Using Knowledge from Anatomy Ontologies

Morphology remains a primary source of phylogenetic information for many groups of organisms, and the only one for most fossil taxa. Organismal anatomy is not a collection of randomly assembled and independent parts, but instead a set of dependent and hierarchically nested entities resulting from ontogeny and phylogeny. How do we make sense of these dependent and at times redundant characters? One promising approach is using ontologies--structured controlled vocabularies that summarize knowledge about different properties of anatomical entities, including developmental and structural dependencies. Here we assess whether the proximity of ontology-annotated characters within an ontology predicts evolutionary patterns. To do so, we measure phylogenetic information across characters and evaluate if it is hierarchically structured by ontological knowledge--in much the same way as phylogeny structures across-species diversity. We implement an approach to evaluate the Bayesian phylogenetic information (BPI) content and phylogenetic dissonance among ontology-annotated anatomical data subsets. We applied this to datasets representing two disparate animal groups: bees (Hexapoda: Hymenoptera: Apoidea, 209 chars) and characiform fishes (Actinopterygii: Ostariophysi: Characiformes, 463 chars). For bees, we find that BPI is not substantially structured by anatomy since dissonance is often high among morphologically related anatomical entities. For fishes, we find substantial information for two clusters of anatomical entities instantiating concepts from the jaws and branchial arch bones, but among-subset information decreases and dissonance increases substantially moving to higher level subsets in the ontology. We further applied our approach to address particular evolutionary hypotheses with an example of morphological evolution in miniature fishes. While we show that ontology does indeed structure phylogenetic information, additional relationships and processes, such as convergence, likely play a substantial role in explaining BPI and dissonance, and merit future investigation. Our work demonstrates how complex morphological datasets can be interrogated with ontologies by allowing one to access how information is spread hierarchically across anatomical concepts, how congruent this information is, and what sorts of processes may structure it: phylogeny, development, or convergence.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2019

A logical model of homology for comparative biology

There is a growing body of research on the evolution of anatomy in a wide variety of organisms. Discoveries in this field could be greatly accelerated by computational methods and resources that enable these findings to be compared across different studies and different organisms and linked with the genes responsible for anatomical modifications. Homology is a key concept in comparative anatomy; two important types are historical homology (the similarity of organisms due to common ancestry) and serial homology (the similarity of repeated structures within an organism). We explored how to most effectively represent historical and serial homology across anatomical structures to facilitate computational reasoning. We assembled a collection of homology assertions from the literature with a set of taxon phenotypes for vertebrate fins and limbs from the Phenoscape Knowledgebase (KB). Using six competency questions, we evaluated the reasoning ramifications of two logical models: the Reciprocal Existential Axioms Homology Model (REA) and the Ancestral Value Axioms Homology Model (AVA). Both models returned the user-expected results for all but one historical homology query and all serial homology queries. Additionally, for each competency question, the AVA model returns the search term and any subtypes. We identify some challenges of implementing complete homology queries due to limitations of OWL reasoning. This work lays the foundation for homology reasoning to be incorporated into other ontology-based tools, such as those that enable synthetic supermatrix construction and candidate gene discovery.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2018

Annotation of phenotypes using ontologies: a Gold Standard for the training and evaluation of natural language processing systems

Natural language descriptions of organismal phenotypes - a principal object of study in biology, are abundant in biological literature. Expressing these phenotypes as logical statements using formal ontologies would enable large-scale analysis on phenotypic information from diverse systems. However, considerable human effort is required to make the semantics of phenotype descriptions amenable to machine reasoning by (a) recognizing appropriate on-tological terms for entities in text and (b) stringing these terms into logical statements. Most existing Natural Language Processing tools stop at entity recognition, leaving a need for tools that can assist with both aspects of the task. The recently described Semantic CharaParser aims to meet this need. We describe the first expert-curated Gold Standard corpus for ontology-based annotation of phenotypes from the systematics literature. We use it to evaluate Semantic CharaParsers annotations and explore differences in performance between humans and machine. We use four annotation accuracy metrics that can account for both semantically identical and similar matches. We found that machine-human consistency was significantly lower than inter-curator (human-human) consistency. Surprisingly, allowing curators access to external information that was not available to Semantic CharaParser did not significantly increase the similarity of their annotations to the Gold Standard nor have a significant effect on inter-curator consistency. We found that the similarity of machine annotations to the Gold Standard increased after new ontology terms relevant to the input text had been added. Evaluation by the original authors of the character descriptions indicated that the Gold Standard annotations came closer to representing their intended meaning than did either the curator or machine annotations. These findings point toward ways to better design of software to augment human curators, and the Gold Standard corpus will allow training and assessment of new tools to improve phenotype annotation accuracy at scale.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2017

Intrinsic specificity differences between transcription factor paralogs partly explain their differential in vivo binding

Members of transcription factor (TF) families, i.e. paralogous TFs, are oftentimes reported to have identical DNA-binding motifs, despite the fact that they perform distinct regulatory functions in the cell. Differential genomic targeting by paralogous TFs is generally assumed to be due to interactions with protein cofactors or the chromatin environment. Contrary to previous assumptions, we find that paralogous TFs have different intrinsic preferences for DNA, not captured by current motif models, and these differences partly explain differential genomic binding and functional specificity. Our finding was possible due to a unique combination of carefully designed high-throughput assays and rigorous computation modeling, integrated into a unified framework called iMADS. We used iMADS to quantify, model, and analyze specificity differences between 11 paralogous TFs from 4 distinct human TF families. Our finding of differential specificity between closely related TFs has important implications for the interpretation of the regulatory effects of non-coding genetic variants.

genomics↗