Biology subjects

Lallier, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Lallier, M..

6 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Does bilingualism buffer genetic predispositions to reading difficulties through alterations of structural interhemispheric connectivity? An ABCD Study.

Here, we test the hypothesis that early sustained exposure to complex bilingual environments can positively affect reading development by altering structural interhemispheric connectivity via the corpus callosum (CC). Interhemispheric connectivity has been shown to be inefficient in dyslexia, but also to support compensatory pathways when genetic risk for reading difficulties is present, by enabling the preserved right hemisphere to support a dysfunctional left hemisphere. Mediation models were conducted on children aged 9-10 years (with a 2-year follow-up assessment) from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development database (N>10,000). Polygenic scores (PGS) for dyslexia and cognitive performance and continuous bilingualism indices were used as predictors, with reading aloud as the outcome. Bilingualism showed a positive effect on reading partially mediated by the anterior CC, independently of overall brain size. In contrast, genetic predispositions to reading difficulties influenced reading primarily through overall brain size rather than CC connectivity specifically. These two pathways were independent, suggesting that bilingual experience and genetic risk operate through distinct neuroanatomical mechanisms. These findings suggest that recurrent early exposure to complex bilingual environments may shape the brains structural connectivity toward a more balanced and integrated bilateral frontal organisation. The results highlight potential brain compensatory pathways induced by environmental experiences that may support more efficient reading development and mitigate risks for developmental dyslexia.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2023

Early delta cortical tracking to non-verbal auditory stimuli predicts reading skills: A one-year longitudinal study

The precision of cortical tracking of auditory rhythmic stimuli in low frequency ranges coding for prosodic (delta) and syllabic (theta) amplitude modulations in the speech signal has been proposed to contribute to the development of phonological processing and reading acquisition. The present study investigates the role of low frequency cortical tracking of non-verbal auditory stimuli in reading acquisition through a longitudinal design from before the onset of formal reading instruction until one year afterwards. At time one, 40 prereading children performed a passive listening task of amplitude modulated white noise presented in the delta (2 Hz) and theta (4 Hz) frequency bands, while their neural activity was recorded via EEG. At time two, at the end of first grade, childrens reading skills were assessed. Results show significant cortical tracking in prereading children at both frequencies, with larger responses for theta than for delta rate non-verbal auditory stimuli. Importantly, only pre-reding cortical tracking measures for delta rate stimuli predicted reading acquisition one year later. These findings underscore the role of early neural synchronization to delta rate rhythmic auditory stimuli to reading acquisition and support the potential important role of early prosodic processing for the development of future reading skills.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2023

The contribution of early language exposure to the cortical tracking of speech

Cortical tracking of speech is relevant for the development of speech perception skills. However, no study to date has explored whether and how cortical tracking of speech is shaped by accumulated language experience, the central question of this study. In 35 bilingual children (6 y.o.) with considerably bigger experience in one language, we collected electroencephalography data while they listened to continuous speech in their two languages. Cortical tracking of speech was assessed at acoustic-temporal and lexico-semantic levels. Children showed more robust acoustic-temporal tracking in the least experienced language, and more sensitive cortical tracking of semantic information in the most experienced language. Additionally, and only for the most experienced language, acoustic-temporal tracking was specifically linked to phonological abilities, and lexico-semantic tracking to vocabulary knowledge. Our results indicate that accumulated linguistic experience is a relevant maturational factor for the cortical tracking of speech at different levels during early language acquisition.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2021

The role of reading experience in atypical cortical tracking of speech and speech-in-noise in dyslexia

Dyslexia is a frequent developmental disorder in which reading acquisition is delayed and that is usually associated with difficulties understanding speech in noise. At the neuronal level, children with dyslexia were reported to display abnormal cortical tracking of speech (CTS) at phrasal rate. Here, we aimed to determine if abnormal tracking is a cause or a consequence of dyslexia and if it is modulated by the severity of dyslexia or the presence of acoustic noise. We included 26 school-age children with dyslexia, 26 age-matched controls and 26 reading-level matched controls. All were native French speakers. Childrens brain activity was recorded with magnetoencephalography while they listened to continuous speech in noiseless and multiple noise conditions. CTS values were compared between groups, conditions and hemispheres, and also within groups, between children with best and worse reading performance. Syllabic CTS was significantly reduced in the right superior temporal gyrus in children with dyslexia compared with controls matched for age but not for reading level. Among children with dyslexia, phrasal CTS tended to lateralize to the left hemisphere in severe dyslexia and lateralized to the right hemisphere in children with mild dyslexia and in all control groups. Finally, phrasal CTS was lower in children with dyslexia compared with age-matched controls, but only in informational noise conditions. No such effect was seen in comparison with reading-level matched controls. Overall, our results confirmed the finding of altered neuronal basis of speech perception in noiseless and babble noise conditions in dyslexia compared with age-matched peers. However, the absence of alteration in comparison with reading-level matched controls suggests that such alterations are a consequence of reduced reading experience rather than a cause of dyslexia. HighlightsO_LIThe cortical tracking of speech (CTS) was assessed in dyslexia and proper controls C_LIO_LIPhrasal CTS and its resistance to noise were altered in dyslexia C_LIO_LISuch alterations were not found in comparison with controls matched for reading level C_LIO_LIThe severity of dyslexia modulated the hemispheric lateralization of phrasal CTS C_LI

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2020

Cortical tracking of speech in noise accounts for reading strategies in children

Humans propensity to acquire literacy relates to several factors, among which, the ability to understand speech in noise (SiN). Still, the nature of the relation between reading and SiN perception abilities remains poorly understood. Here, we dissect the interplay between (i) reading abilities, (ii) classical behavioral predictors of reading (phonological awareness, phonological memory and lexical access), and (iii) electrophysiological markers of SiN perception in 99 elementary school children (26 with dyslexia). We demonstrate that cortical representation of phrasal content of SiN relates to the development of the lexical (but not sublexical) reading strategy. In contrast, classical behavioral predictors of reading abilities and the ability to benefit from visual speech to represent the syllabic content of SiN account for global reading performance (i.e., speed and accuracy of lexical and sublexical reading). Finally, we found that individuals with dyslexia properly integrate visual speech information to optimize processing of syntactic information, but not to sustain acoustic/phonemic processing. These results clarify the nature of the relation between SiN perception and reading abilities in typical and dyslexic child readers, and identified novel electrophysiological markers of emergent literacy.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2019

Neocortical activity tracks syllable and phrasal structure of self-produced speech

To gain novel insights into how the human brain processes self-produced auditory information during reading aloud, we investigated the coupling between neuromagnetic activity and the temporal envelope of the heard speech sounds (i.e., speech brain tracking) in a group of adults who 1) read a text aloud, 2) listened to a recording of their own speech (i.e., playback), and 3) listened to another speech recording. Coherence analyses revealed that, during reading aloud, the readers brain tracked the slow temporal fluctuations of the speech output. Specifically, auditory cortices tracked phrasal structure (<1 Hz) but to a lesser extent than during the two speech listening conditions. Also, the tracking of syllable structure (4-8 Hz) occurred at parietal opercula during reading aloud and at auditory cortices during listening. Directionality analyses based on renormalized partial directed coherence revealed that speech brain tracking at <1 Hz and 4-8 Hz is dominated by speech-to-brain directional coupling during both reading aloud and listening, meaning that speech brain tracking mainly entails auditory feedback processing. Nevertheless, brain-to-speech directional coupling at 4- 8 Hz was enhanced during reading aloud compared with listening, likely reflecting speech monitoring before production. Altogether, these data bring novel insights into how auditory verbal information is tracked by the human brain during perception and self-generation of connected speech.\n\nHighlightsO_LIThe brain tracks phrasal and syllabic rhythmicity of self-produced (read) speech.\nC_LIO_LITracking of phrasal structures is attenuated during reading compared with listening.\nC_LIO_LISpeech rhythmicity mainly drives brain activity during reading and listening.\nC_LIO_LIBrain activity drives syllabic rhythmicity more during reading than listening.\nC_LI

neuroscience↗