Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Lal Khakpoor, F.

Publications and source records attributed to Lal Khakpoor, F..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Supervised Domain Adaptation Mitigates Cross-Ethnicity Prediction Error in Neuroimaging Based Cognitive Prediction

Machine learning models are increasingly used to predict cognitive and clinical outcomes from neuroimaging data, yet challenges in fairness and generalizability remain. Large scale datasets are often racially and ethnically imbalanced, leading to systematic performance disparities, with models typically achieving higher accuracy for majority populations represented in the training data. In this study, we evaluated whether supervised domain adaptation methods including balanced weighting, two-stage TrAdaBoost, feature augmentation with SrcOnly prediction, and linear interpolation can mitigate these biases. Using the ABCD dataset, we assessed whether models trained on 80 MRI measures from White American participants could generalize more effectively to African American participants. All domain adaptation methods reduced prediction error for African American participants, particularly for MRI modalities with large baseline disparities (e.g., structural MRI), while offering limited improvements where initial gaps were smaller (e.g., functional connectivity). Among the approaches, balanced weighting performed best and remained stable and beneficial even when only 10 African American participants were used to adapt the original model trained exclusively on White American participants. These findings suggest that simple, low-cost strategies can effectively reduce cross-ethnic performance gaps and improve equity in predictive neuroimaging, offering a practical path forward for future neuroimaging predictive biomarkers.

neuroscience↗

Multimodal MRI prediction of cognitive functioning across the lifespan: separating between-person differences from within-person changes

Brain MRI shows promise for predicting cognitive functioning, but its utility depends on its capacity to capture stable between-person differences (e.g., patient stratification), longitudinal within-person changes (e.g., prognosis, treatment monitoring), or both. Using longitudinal data from 450 adults (aged 21-90; up to three waves, five years apart) in the Dallas Lifespan Brain Study, we benchmarked five modalities, task fMRI, functional connectivity (FC), structural MRI (sMRI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and arterial spin labeling (ASL), across 37 phenotypes and their combination. Stacking all MRI modalities into one marker predicted cognitive functioning with the highest accuracy (R{superscript 2}=.51), followed by DWI and FC. Variance decomposition showed MRI markers explained substantial between-person variance (up to 60.3%) but modest within-person changes (up to 17.2%) in cognitive functioning. Commonality analysis revealed most markers, except ASL, overlapped with age-related variance in cognitive functioning. These findings clarify the strengths and limitations of MRI markers for stratifying and monitoring cognitive aging.

neuroscience↗

When Brain Models Are not Universal: Benchmarking of Ethnic Bias in MRI-Based Cognitive Prediction Across Modalities

Predictive neuroimaging models promise precision medicine but risk exacerbating health inequities if they perform unevenly across ethnic/racial groups. Using the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development data, we benchmarked ethnic/racial bias in models predicting cognitive functioning from 91 MRI phenotypes across four training strategies. Models trained on one ethnicity performed best within that group. Models trained on participants sampled without regard to ethnicity, a common practice, performed better on White participants, likely because the ABCD sample was predominantly White. Training on equal-sized White and African American subsamples reduced disparities without accuracy loss, emerging as the upper bound for both accuracy and fairness. Structural MRI exhibited the greatest bias, whereas task-based fMRI phenotypes were more equitable. Stronger brain-cognition associations generalized more equitably, but multimodal stacking--despite enhancing prediction--did not improve fairness. Increasing representation of African American participants improved performance up to balanced sampling, with diminishing returns beyond. This first modality-wide benchmark reveals pervasive, modality-dependent ethnic bias in cognitive prediction and identifies key factors shaping equity in neuroimaging models.

neuroscience↗