Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Laks, A. B.

Publications and source records attributed to Laks, A. B..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

The Georgetown Reading in Aging Neuroimaging Dataset (GRAND): Reading and multimodal MRI data in older adults

Reading is a critical skill in modern society. Most research on reading is conducted in school age children or young adults. However, acquired brain disorders often affect reading ability, and these disorders tend to occur in older adults. It is therefore critical to examine the normative distribution of reading behavior and the brain basis of reading in older adults. Here, we provide trial-wise single word and pseudoword oral reading and lexical decision data, as well as structural, functional, and diffusion-weighted MRI data from 116 neurotypical adults aged 22 to 84 years (mean = 59). Accuracy, response times, and errors are provided for corpora that are parametrically modulated in frequency, imageability, and regularity for real words and consistency of spelling-sound mapping for pseudowords. This dataset includes both minimally processed behavior (trial-wise data) and MRI data, and participant- and item-wise summary metrics and processed MRI data. These data serve both as a normative sample for reading behavior in older adults, but also as a valuable resource for identifying novel brain-behavioral relationships.

neuroscience↗

Meaning for reading pseudowords: errors reveal semantic influences on pseudoword reading after stroke

Impaired reading, i.e., alexia, is common after left hemisphere stroke. The most common deficit in alexia is a difficulty reading aloud pronounceable novel words, also called pseudowords. While semantic and phonological processes both subserve reading real words, pseudoword reading deficits in alexia are typically ascribed to phonological deficits alone. Some theories, however, suggest that pseudoword reading relies in part on lexical-semantic knowledge, such that semantic deficits could also contribute to poor pseudoword reading in alexia. Leveraging a large sample of left-hemisphere stroke survivors, we examine the cognitive and neural substrates of pseudoword reading accuracy and two error types: lexicalization errors, where a pseudoword is incorrectly read as a real word, and nonword errors, where a pseudoword is read as an incorrect nonword. 76 left-hemisphere stroke survivors read 60 pseudowords aloud, and performed two pseudoword repetition tasks to assess phonological processing and two picture naming tasks to assess mappings between lexical semantics and phonology. Regression models assessed how pseudoword repetition and naming related to overall accuracy and rates of lexicalization and nonword errors in pseudoword reading. Voxel-based and connectome lesion-symptom mapping localized the neural territory responsible for these errors. Pseudoword repetition and naming independently related to pseudoword reading accuracy. Pseudoword repetition but not naming deficits predicted higher rates of lexicalization errors, while naming but not pseudoword repetition deficits predicted higher rates of nonword errors. Greater nonword error rate also predicted smaller imageability effects in real word reading (t(71)=-3.2, p=0.002). Lexicalization errors were associated with lesions to and disconnections of the left putamen and basal ganglia. Nonword errors were associated with lesions to the superior and middle temporal gyri, as well as broad temporo-parietal disconnections, overlapping with previous lesion-mapping results implicating these regions in semantic contributions to word reading. These results suggest that lexicalization errors result from impaired planning and execution of novel motor plans, causing a reliance on the well-learned motor plans associated with lexical items. In contrast, greater rates of nonword errors, relative to lexicalization errors, occur when semantic contributions to reading are impaired. Overall, these findings demonstrate that semantic processes are involved in reading pseudowords, at least in stroke alexia. These findings support connectionist accounts of reading in which damage in the direct orthography to phonology route for reading leads to greater reliance on semantic representations, even for pseudowords, suggesting a reinterpretation of pseudoword reading as a pure measure of phonological deficits in reading.

neuroscience↗

Simulating the spectrum, not the syndrome: Large scale individualized modeling of oral reading in stroke aphasia

Computational models are a linchpin in our understanding of the neurocognitive basis of reading. These models can simulate idealized profiles of alexia syndromes, but in reality, individuals with alexia present with a wide range of mixed deficits rather than idealized syndromes. To provide a complete cognitive theory of reading, computational models must be able to account for this individual variation. However, this has never been demonstrated. We test oral reading and non-reading phonological and semantic processing in 83 left-hemisphere stroke survivors. We show that individual alexia profiles can be simulated by applying graded phonology and semantic lesions to an artificial neural network model of reading, creating "matched models" that represent individual stroke survivors. The severity of damage to the semantic and phonological layers of the matched models was highly correlated with directly-measured semantic and phonological processing deficits. However, we also identify systematic ways in which the models fail to simulate the reading performance of their matched stroke survivors. Our results support theories of alexia that rely on process-based deficits, demonstrate the feasibility of large-scale individualized modelling of alexia, and suggest ways to further improve the correspondence of models and human reading behavior.

neuroscience↗