Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Ladwig, Z.

Publications and source records attributed to Ladwig, Z..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Objective Quality Assessment for Precision Functional MRI Data

Precision functional mapping (PFM) enables individual-level characterization of brain network organization but requires substantially more and higher-quality fMRI data than is standard. Despite its growing use, objective criteria for data sufficiency and quality needed to ensure interpretable and replicable individual-level results remain unclear. Here, we introduce the Network Similarity Index (NSI), an objective measure of the extent to which functional connectivity (FC) patterns in an individual dataset express the large-scale network structure required for PFM. NSI captures the integrity of low-spatial-frequency, coherent network organization and denoising fidelity, and aligns closely with blinded expert assessments of PFM usability. NSI also accounts for variability in the rate at which FC becomes reliable across individuals. Here, we provide an open-source framework for NSI-based data quality evaluation and models for linking NSI values with expert-judged PFM suitability. This framework can also inform expected returns from additional data collection, enabling principled decisions about data sufficiency and replication in precision fMRI research.

neuroscience↗

Precision fMRI reveals densely interdigitated network patches with conserved motifs in the lateral prefrontal cortex

Dominant models of human lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC) organization emphasize broad domain-general zones and smooth functional gradients. However, these models rely heavily on group-averaged neuroimaging, which can obscure fine-scale cortical features - especially in highly inter-individually variable regions like the LPFC. To address this limitation, we collected a new precision fMRI dataset from 10 individuals, each with approximately 2 hours of resting-state and 6 hours of task data. We mapped individual-specific LPFC networks using resting-state fMRI and tested network-level functional preferences using task fMRI. We found that individual LPFC organization differed markedly from group-averaged estimates. Individual maps showed more fragmented and interdigitated networks - especially in anterior LPFC - including novel conserved motifs present across individuals. Task fMRI revealed that distinct but adjacent networks support domain-specific processes (i.e., language, social cognition, episodic projection) versus domain-general control. Sharp functional boundaries were visible at the individual level that could not be observed in group data. These findings uncover previously hidden organizational principles in the LPFC and offer a framework for understanding how the LPFC supports flexible, complex cognition through a finely organized architecture.

neuroscience↗

BOLD cofluctuation 'events' are predicted from static functional connectivity

Recent work identified single time points ("events") of high regional cofluctuation in functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) which contain more large-scale brain network information than other, low cofluctuation time points. This suggested that events might be a discrete, temporally sparse signal which drives functional connectivity (FC) over the timeseries. However, a different, not yet explored possibility is that network information differences between time points are driven by sampling variability on a constant, static, noisy signal. Using a combination of real and simulated data, we examined the relationship between cofluctuation and network structure and asked if this relationship was unique, or if it could arise from sampling variability alone. First, we show that events are not discrete - there is a gradually increasing relationship between network structure and cofluctuation; [~]50% of samples show very strong network structure. Second, using simulations we show that this relationship is predicted from sampling variability on static FC. Finally, we show that randomly selected points can capture network structure about as well as events, largely because of their temporal spacing. Together, these results suggest that, while events exhibit particularly strong representations of static FC, there is little evidence that events are unique timepoints that drive FC structure. Instead, a parsimonious explanation for the data is that events arise from a single static, but noisy, FC structure. HIGHLIGHTSO_LIPast results suggested high cofluctuation BOLD "events" drive fMRI functional connectivity, FC C_LIO_LIHere, events were examined in both real fMRI data and a stationary null model to test this model C_LIO_LIIn real data, >50% of BOLD timepoints show high modularity and similarity to time- averaged FC C_LIO_LIStationary null models identified events with similar behavior to real data C_LIO_LIEvents may not be a transient driver of static FC, but rather an expected outcome of it. C_LI

neuroscience↗

Network variants are similar between task and rest states

Recent work has demonstrated that individual-specific variations in functional networks (that we call "network variants") can be identified in individuals using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). These network variants exhibit reliability over time with resting-state fMRI data. These properties have suggested that network variants may be trait-like markers of individual differences in brain organization. Another test of this conclusion would be to examine if network variants are stable between task and rest states. Here, we use precision data from the Midnight Scan Club (MSC) to demonstrate that (1) task data can be used to identify network variants reliably, (2) these network variants show substantial spatial overlap with those observed in rest, although state-specific effects are present, (3) network variants assign to similar canonical functional networks in different states, and (4) single tasks or a combination of multiple tasks produce similar network variants to rest. Together, these findings further reinforce the trait-like nature of network variants and demonstrate the utility of using task data to define network variants.

neuroscience↗