Biology subjects

Kurbidaeva, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Kurbidaeva, A..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Sequence-to-function modeling uncovers the context-specific grammar of Drosophila chromatin insulation

Chromatin is organized into self-interacting topologically associating domains partitioned by boundary elements that insulate adjacent domains and restrict regulatory interactions. Yet, how sequence context and combinations of factors dictate boundary strength remains incompletely understood. Here we present Domino, a deep learning framework that maps genomic sequences to quantitative insulation scores defined directly from single-nucleosome resolution Drosophila melanogaster Micro-C data. Unlike traditional transcription factor motif scanning, Domino captures broad sequence context to resolve the functional contributions of individual sequence elements. We validate model predictions through experimental perturbations of insulator sequences. Model interpretation yields insulation-associated motifs genome-wide. Across 7,311 embryonic boundaries, Domino reveals a comprehensive insulation grammar defined by just 24 primary motifs that account for 59% of the boundaries, with an average of only two motifs per motif-containing boundary. Beyond known factors, we identify the zinc-finger proteins Trem, CG4854 and CG17385 as previously unreported insulation factors. We uncover distance- and orientation-dependent motif synergy, including a strict orientation preference of the prominent architectural factor M1BP. Finally, Domino traces tissue-specific shifts in the insulator landscape from the embryo to larval and adult brains, nominating new brain-specific insulation motifs. In sum, Domino provides a generalizable framework for decoding the regulatory logic of 3D genome architecture.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2026

Shared binding sites for the chromosomal architectural protein Su(Hw) mediate physical interactions between Drosophila TAD boundaries

The head-to-tail pairing of the nhomie and homie boundaries is responsible for the formation of a stem-loop TAD (topologically associated domain) that encompasses the even-skipped (eve) gene and its regulatory elements. TAD boundaries like homie and nhomie have partner preferences and one mechanism thought to be important in linking compatible boundaries is shared binding sites for the same architectural protein. Both eve boundaries have a single binding site for the polydactyl zinc finger protein Su(Hw). Here we have investigated the role of the shared Su(Hw) sites in the long-distance regulation of a dual reporter by the eve enhancers. Consistent with this mechanism, we find that when the transgene nhomie or homie boundary has a mutation in the Su(Hw) binding site, reporter activation by the eve enhancers is severely compromised. Using MicroC we show the mutating the single Su(Hw) substantially weakens the ability of the nhomie and homie boundaries in the transgene to physically pair with the two endogenous eve boundaries. Su(Hw) binding sites are not, however, sufficient as the gypsy su(Hw) insulator is unable to support long-distance regulation. In a less demanding transvection assay mutations in the nhomie and homie Su(hw) site have only a modest effect on regulatory interactions. The eve boundaries can mediate transvection with the gypsy insulator; however. they are not compatible with the dCTCF Fab-8 boundary even in the transvection assay. Finally, we show that the regulatory and physical interactions of the nhomie boundary in the transgene and the two endogenous eve boundaries are incompatible with the popular cohesin-loop extrusion model.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2023

Chromosome Structure I: Loop extrusion or boundary:boundary pairing?

Two different models have been proposed to explain how the endpoints of chromatin looped domains ("TADs") in eukaryotic chromosomes are determined. In the first, a cohesin complex extrudes a loop until it encounters a boundary element roadblock, generating a stem-loop. In this model, boundaries are functionally autonomous: they have an intrinsic ability to halt the movement of incoming cohesin complexes that is independent of the properties of neighboring boundaries. In the second, loops are generated by boundary:boundary pairing. In this model, boundaries are functionally non-autonomous, and their ability to form a loop depends upon how well they match with their neighbors. Moreover, unlike the loop-extrusion model, pairing interactions can generate both stem-loops and circle-loops. We have used a combination of MicroC to analyze how TADs are organized, and experimental manipulations of the even skipped TAD boundary, homie, to test the predictions of the "loop-extrusion" and the "boundary-pairing" models. Our findings are incompatible with the loop-extrusion model and instead suggest that the endpoints of TADs in flies are determined by a mechanism in which boundary elements physically pair with their partners, either head-to-head or head-to-tail, with varying degrees of specificity. Although our experiments do not address how partners find each other, the mechanism is unlikely to require loop extrusion.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2018

The bithorax complex iab-7 Polycomb Response Element has a novel role in the functioning of the Fab-7 chromatin boundary

Expression of the three Bithorax complex homeotic genes is orchestrated by nine parasegment-specific regulatory domains. Autonomy of each domain is conferred by boundary elements (insulators). Here, we have used an in situ replacement strategy to reanalyze the sequences required for the functioning of one of the best-characterized fly boundaries, Fab-7. It was initially identified by a deletion, Fab-71, that transformed parasegment (PS) 11 into a duplicate copy of PS12. Fab-71 deleted four nuclease hypersensitive sites, HS*, HS1, HS2, and HS3, located in between the iab-6 and iab-7 regulatory domains. Transgene and P-element excision experiments mapped the boundary to HS*+HS1+HS2, while HS3 was shown to be the iab-7 Polycomb response element (PRE). Recent replacement experiments showed that HS1 is both necessary and sufficient for boundary activity when HS3 is also presented in the replacement construct. Surprisingly, while HS1+HS3 combination has full boundary activity, we discovered that HS1 alone has only minimal function. Moreover, when combined with HS3, only the distal half of HS1, dHS1, is needed. A [~]1,000 kD multiprotein complex containing the GAF protein, called the LBC, binds to the dHS1 sequence and we show that mutations in dHS1 that disrupt LBC binding in nuclear extracts eliminate boundary activity and GAF binding in vivo. HS3 has binding sites for GAF and Pho proteins that are required for PRE silencing. In contrast, HS3 boundary activity only requires the GAF binding sites. LBC binding with HS3 in nuclear extracts, and GAF association in vivo depend upon the HS3 GAF sites, but not the Pho sites. Consistent with a role for the LBC in HS3 boundary activity, the boundary function of the dHS1+HS3mPho combination is lost when the flies are heterozygous for a mutation in the GAF gene. Taken together, these results reveal a novel function for the iab-7 PREs in chromosome architecture.\n\nAuthor SummaryPolycomb group proteins (PcG) are important epigenetic regulators of developmental genes in all higher eukaryotes. In Drosophila, these proteins are bound to specific regulatory DNA elements called Polycomb group Response Elements (PREs). PcG support proper patterns of homeotic gene expression throughout development. Drosophila PREs are made up of binding sites for a complex array of DNA binding proteins, including GAF and Pho. In the regulatory region of the bithorax complex (BX-C), the boundary/insulator elements organize the autonomous regulatory domains, and their active or repressed states are regulated by PREs. Here, we studied the domain organization of the Fab-7 boundary and the neighboring PRE, which separate the iab-6 and iab-7 domains involved in transcription of the Abd-B gene. It was previously thought that PRE recruits PcG proteins that inhibit activation of the iab-7 enhancers in the inappropriate domains. However, here we found that PRE contributes to boundary activity and in combination with a key 242 bp Fab-7 region (dHS1) can form a completely functional boundary. Late Boundary Complex (LBC) binds not only to dHS1 but also to PRE and is required for the boundary activity of both elements. At the same time, mutations of Pho binding sites strongly diminish recruiting of PcG but do not considerably affect boundary function, suggesting that these activities can be separated in PRE.

genetics↗