Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Krystufek, R.

Publications and source records attributed to Krystufek, R..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Sensitive quantification of fibroblast activation protein and high-throughput screening for inhibition by FDA-approved compounds

Fibroblast activation protein (FAP) has been extensively studied as a cancer biomarker for decades. Recently, small-molecule FAP inhibitors have been widely adopted as a targeting moiety of experimental theranostic radiotracers. Here we present a fast qPCR-based analytical method allowing FAP inhibition screening in a high-throughput regime. In order to identify clinically relevant compounds that might interfere with FAP-targeted approaches, we focused on the library of FDA-approved drugs. Using the DNA-linked Inhibitor Antibody Assay (DIANA), we tested a library of 2,667 compounds within just few hours and identified numerous FDA-approved drugs as novel FAP inhibitors. Notably, prodrugs of cephalosporin antibiotics, reverse-transcriptase inhibitors, and one elastase inhibitor were the most potent FAP inhibitors in our dataset. In addition, by employing FAP DIANA in quantification mode, we were able to determine FAP concentrations in human plasma samples. Together, our work expands the repertoire of FAP inhibitors, underscores the potential interference of co-administered drugs with FAP-targeting strategies, and presents a sensitive and low-consumption ELISA alternative for FAP quantification with a detection limit of 50 pg/ml. Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=144 SRC="FIGDIR/small/600598v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (25K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1c19d55org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@405b3aorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1255281org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@14bc80e_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

biochemistry↗

Early selection of the amino acid alphabet was adaptively shaped by biophysical constraints of foldability

Whereas modern proteins rely on a quasi-universal repertoire of 20 canonical amino acids (AAs), numerous lines of evidence suggest that ancient proteins relied on a limited alphabet of 10 early AAs, and that the 10 late AAs were products of biosynthetic pathways. However, many non-proteinogenic AAs were also prebiotically available, which begs two fundamental questions: Why do we have the current modern amino acid alphabet, and Would proteins be able to fold into globular structures as well if different amino acids comprised the genetic code? Here, we experimentally evaluated the solubility and secondary structure propensities of several prebiotically relevant amino acids in the context of synthetic combinatorial 25-mer peptide libraries. The most prebiotically abundant linear aliphatic and basic residues were incorporated along with or in place of other early amino acids to explore these alternative sequence spaces. We show that foldability was a critical factor in the selection of the canonical alphabet. Unbranched aliphatic and short-chain basic amino acids were purged from the proteinogenic alphabet despite their high prebiotic abundance because they generate polypeptides that are over-solubilized and have low packing efficiency. Surprisingly, we find that the inclusion of a short-chain basic amino acid also decreases polypeptides secondary structure potential. Our results support the view that despite lacking basic residues, the early canonical alphabet was remarkably adaptive at supporting protein folding and explain why basic residues were only incorporated at a later stage of the alphabet evolution.

biophysics↗