Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Krogh, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Krogh, M..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Quantifying the hydrological niche of swamp vegetation communities using indicator species

Indicator species are typically used to infer the presence of other biota or specific environmental conditions. Here we use indicator species to quantify the hydrological niche of their corresponding vegetation communities within Coastal Upland Swamps of the Sydney Basin Bioregion, Australia. Swamp vegetation organizes naturally into five recognised communities, thought to occupy distinct positions along a hydrological gradient. However, longwall mining reduces hydro-period, potentially impacting the observed vegetation. We modelled the hydrological niche for each community using the relative frequency of 20 vascular plant indicator species (four for each community) and time series soil moisture data from 11 unmined sites across four swamps. We then used this model to predict indicator species frequencies in 3 mine-impacted sites. Indicator species were modelled as a function of the average number of days-per-year that swamps remained saturated at the base of the root zone (30 cm below surface). Hydrological niches were well differentiated for four communities with the estimated optimal mean annual days-per-year saturated ranging from Restioid heath at 16 [<16, 29] (mean {+/-} [95% uncertainty]) to Ti-tree thicket at 352 [322, >353]. Banksia thicket 96 [65, 154] and Cyperoid heath 257 [204, 297] communities were intermediate. However, Sedgeland indicator species showed limited variation with changing saturation, and their hydrological niche remains unclear. The model under-predicted the frequency of Cyperoid heath and over-predicted Banksia thicket indicator species in mine-impacted sites, suggesting vegetation is not yet in equilibrium with hydrology. Results suggest indicator species can provide a reliable basis for determining the hydrological niche of wetland plant communities, which can in turn predict community-level impacts of hydrological change.

ecology↗

Interactions between anthropogenic stressors and recurring perturbations mediate ecosystem resilience or collapse

Insights into declines in ecosystem resilience, their causes and effects, can inform pre-emptive action to avoid ecosystem collapse and loss of biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being. Empirical studies of ecosystem collapse are rare and hampered by ecosystem complexity, non-linear and lagged responses, and interactions across scales. We investigated how an anthropogenic stressor could diminish ecosystem resilience to a recurring perturbation by altering a critical ecosystem driver. We studied groundwater-dependent, peat-accumulating, fire-prone wetlands in southeastern Australia. We hypothesised that underground mining (stressor) reduced resilience of these wetlands to landscape fires (perturbation) by diminishing groundwater, a key ecosystem driver. We monitored soil moisture as an indicator of ecosystem resilience during and after underground mining and, after a landscape fire, we compared the responses of multiple state variables representing ecosystem structure, composition and function in wetlands within the mining footprint to unmined reference wetlands. Soil moisture showed very strong evidence of decline without recovery in mined swamps, but was maintained in reference swamps through eight years. Relative to burnt reference swamps, burnt and mined swamps showed greater loss of peat via substrate combustion, reduced cover, height and biomass of regenerating vegetation, reduced post-fire plant species richness and abundance, altered plant species composition, increased mortality rates of woody plants, reduced post-fire seedling recruitment, and local extinction of a hydrophilc fauna species. Mined swamps therefore showed strong symptoms of post-fire ecosystem collapse, while reference swamps regenerated vigorously. We conclude that an anthropogenic stressor may diminish the resilience of an ecosystem to recurring perturbations, predisposing it to collapse. Avoidance of ecosystem collapse hinges on early diagnosis of mechanisms and preventative risk reduction. It may be possible to delay or ameliorate symptoms of collapse or to restore resilience, but the latter appears unlikely in our study system due to fundamental alteration of a critical ecosystem driver.

ecology↗