Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Kroehnert, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Kroehnert, A..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Embodied Navigation: whole-body movement drives path integration in large-scale free-walking virtual reality

Human navigation relies on combining body cues (vestibular and proprioceptive signals) with visual cues such as optic flow. The weighting and integration of these signals during the continuous tracking of walked distances and angles, known as path integration, remain poorly understood. Previous path integration studies have been limited to small spaces (< 150 m2) and the influence of complex environments on cue weighting of body and vision cues is still unclear. Here, we conducted the largest-environment free-walking virtual reality navigation study to date in a 45 x 25 m facility (1, 215 m2) using triangle completion tasks in naturalistic environments. We systematically manipulated sensory input across three conditions: natural active walking (full sensory integration), active joystick control (visual cues only), and blindfolded active walking (body cues only). Participants navigated through both sparse fallow land without trees and more complex forest environments with 400 trees. We embedded performance data in a Bayesian cue combination model to analyse the underlying combination mechanism. Our results provide evidence that most participants substantially favour body cues over visual cues in a non-Bayesian combination process, with considerable inter-individual variance in cue dominance strength and side biases. While transitioning from fallow land to forests reduced directional variance, weighting of body and visual information remained constant. These findings advance our understanding of human spatial navigation by demonstrating that body-based cues dominate path integration even in visually rich, large-scale environments, challenging assumptions about optimal Bayesian cue integration in human navigation.

neuroscience↗

Uncovering persistent biases in human path integration by separating left and right trials

Navigation ability strongly varies between humans. Careful analysis of errors occurring in navigation, or indeed any cognitive process, offers insight into the underlying mechanisms at different levels. While analyses at the individual level allow nuanced identification of error persistences across conditions and time, the population level facilitates generalisation but precludes conclusions about lower-level phenomena. Regarding the critical navigation mechanism of path integration - the continuous tracking of navigated paths for self-localisation - previous studies have focused on populationlevel analyses, revealing systematic errors in estimating the travelled angles and distances. However, at the individual level, there are indications that people also possess left or right biases that are classically overlooked when pooling left and right trials. Therefore, we carefully investigate individual path integration errors in (1) a re-analysis of data from several influential human navigation studies, and (2) our own virtual reality path integration experiment. For both, we confirm time-persistent individual side biases, but find no evidence for consistent errors at the population level, suggesting that important aspects in human navigation performance might be overlooked by averaging across sides.

animal behavior and cognition↗