Search bioRxivSearch

Biology subjects

Kristensen, S. B.

Publications and source records attributed to Kristensen, S. B..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Novel regression methods for metacognition

Metacognition is an important component in basic science and clinical psychology, often studied through complex, cognitive experiments. While Signal Detection Theory (SDT) provides a popular and pervasive framework for modelling responses from such experiments, a shortfall remains that it cannot in a straightforward manner account for the often complex designs. Additionally, SDT does not provide direct estimates of metacognitive ability. This latter shortcoming has recently been sought remedied by introduction of a measure for metacognitive sensitivity dubbed meta-d. The need for a flexible regression model framework remains, however, which should also incorporate the new sensitivity measure. In the present paper, we argue that a straightforward extension of SDT is obtained by identifying the model with the proportional odds model, a widely implemented, ordinal regression technique. We go on to develop a formal statistical framework for metacognitive sensitivity by defining a model that combines standard SDT with meta-d in a latent variable model. We show how this agrees with the literature on meta-d and constitutes a practical framework for extending the model. We supply several teoretical considerations on the model, including closed-form approximate estimates of meta-d and optimal weighing of response-specific meta-sensitivities. We discuss regression analysis as an application of the obtained model and illustrate our points through simulations. Lastly, we present R-software that implements the model. Our methods and their implementation extend the computational possibilities of SDT and meta-d and are useful for theoretical and practical researchers of metacognition.

neuroscience

Is whole-brain functional connectivity a neuromarker of sustained attention? Comment on Rosenberg & al. (2016)

Identification of neuromarkers accurately predicting cognitive characteristics from a single, standardised MRI scan could be tremendously useful in basic psychology and clinical practise. In a recent article, Rosenberg et al. (Nat Neurosci, 19, 165-171, 2016) argue that whole-brain functional network strength is a broadly applicable neuromarker of sustained attention. They claim that this marker accurately predicts performance from task related as well as resting state activity. Here, we discuss the applicability and generalizability in the context of three methodological concerns: Simulations show that the statistical methods for the 1) initial validation analyses as well as 2) internal validation using leave-one-out cross validation, are biased towards significance; 3) simple and complex models are compared suboptimally. Overall, we find that the article of Rosenberg et al. provides sufficient proof that network strength is associated with attentional capacity that it is not possible to say to which extent, and for this reason we argue that it cannot be concluded that the network is a broadly applicable neuromarker.

neuroscience