Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Kras, J.

Publications and source records attributed to Kras, J..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Multiomic clocks to predict phenotypic age in mice

Biological age refers to a persons overall health in aging, as distinct from their chronological age. Diverse measures of biological age, referred to as "clocks", have been developed in recent years and enable risk assessments, and an estimation of the efficacy of longevity interventions in animals and humans. While most clocks are trained to predict chronological age, clocks have been developed to predict more complex composite biological age outcomes, at least in humans. These composite outcomes can be made up of a combination of phenotypic data, chronological age, and disease or mortality risk. Here, we develop the first such composite biological age measure for mice: the mouse phenotypic age model (Mouse PhenoAge). This outcome is based on frailty measures, complete blood counts, and mortality risk in a longitudinally assessed cohort of male and female C57BL/6 mice. We then develop clocks to predict Mouse PhenoAge, based on multi-omic models using metabolomic and DNA methylation data. Our models accurately predict Mouse PhenoAge, and residuals of the models are associated with remaining lifespan, even for mice of the same chronological age. These methods offer novel ways to accurately predict mortality in laboratory mice thus reducing the need for lengthy and costly survival studies.

systems biology↗

Measuring technical variability in Illumina DNA methylation microarrays

DNA methylation microarrays have become a widely used tool for investigating epigenetic modifications in various aspects of biomedical research. However, technical variability in methylation data poses challenges for downstream applications such as predictive modeling of health and disease. In this study, we measure the impact of common sources of technical variability in Illumina DNA methylation microarray data, with a specific focus on positional biases inherent within the microarray technology. By utilizing a dataset comprised of multiple, highly similar technical replicates, we identified a chamber number bias, with different chambers of the microarray exhibiting systematic differences in fluorescence intensities and their derived methylation beta values, which are only partially corrected for by existing preprocessing methods, and demonstrate that this positional bias can lead to false positive results during differential methylation testing. Additionally, our investigation identified outliers in low-level fluorescence data which might play a role in contributing to predictive error in computational models of health-relevant traits such as age.

bioinformatics↗