Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Kraemer, P. M.

Publications and source records attributed to Kraemer, P. M..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Episodic memory retrieval affects the onset and dynamics of evidence accumulation during value-based decisions

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWIn neuroeconomics, there is much interest in understanding simple value-based choices where agents choose between visually presented goods, comparable to a shopping scenario in a supermarket. However, many everyday decisions are made in the physical absence of the considered goods, requiring agents to recall information about the goods from memory. Here, we asked whether and how this reliance on an internal memory representation affects the temporal dynamics of decision making on a cognitive and neural level. Participants performed a remember-and-decide task, in which they made simple purchasing decisions between money offers and snack items while undergoing EEG. Snack identity was presented either visually (value trials) or had to be recalled from memory (memory trials). Behavioral data indicated comparable choice consistency across both trial types, but considerably longer response times (RT) in memory trials. Drift-diffusion modeling suggested that this RT difference was due to longer non-decision time of decision processes as well as altered evidence accumulation dynamics (lower accumulation rate and higher decision threshold). The non-decision time effect was supported by a delayed onset of the lateralized readiness potential. These results show that both, decision and non-decision processes are prolonged when participants need to resort to internal memory representations during value-based decisions.

neuroscience↗

A fronto-temporo-parietal network disambiguates potential objects of joint attention

We use the others gaze direction to identify her/his object of interest and to shift our attention to the same object, i.e. to establish joint attention. However, gaze direction may not be sufficient to unambiguously identify the object of interest as the others gaze may hit more than one object. In this case, the observer must use a priori information to disambiguate the object choice. Using fMRI, we suggest that the disambiguation is based on a 3-component network. A first component, the well-known gaze following patch in the posterior STS is activated by gaze following per se. BOLD activity here is determined exclusively by the usage of gaze direction and is independent of the need to disambiguate the relevant object. On the other hand, BOLD activity revealing a priori information for the disambiguation and starting early enough to this end is confined to a patch of cortex at the inferior frontal junction. Finally, BOLD activity reflecting the convergence of both, a priori information and gaze direction, needed to shift attention to a particular object location is confined to the posterior parietal cortex.

neuroscience↗