Biology subjects

Kozlov, A. G.

Publications and source records attributed to Kozlov, A. G..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Two heads are better than one: Single stranded DNA translocation of UvrD-family dimers vs. monomers

UvrD-family Superfamily 1A helicases are processive ATP-dependent motor proteins that function during DNA replication, recombination, repair, and transcription. UvrD-family monomers translocate along single stranded (ss) DNA with 3-to-5 directionality but must be activated by dimerization to become helicases in the absence of force or accessory factors. Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) UvrD1 helicase forms dimers via a disulfide bond between native cysteines in the 2B sub-domains of each monomer. E. coli UvrD forms non-covalent dimers using the same 2B domain interface as in Mtb UvrD1. Using both ensemble and single DNA molecule approaches we examined an E. coli UvrD variant (R421C), which forms covalent dimers with constitutive helicase activity. For the first time this has enabled us to compare the ssDNA translocation and helicase activities of covalent dimers and monomers. Crosslinked UvrD dimers exhibit much higher ssDNA translocation processivities than monomers, although with similar translocation rates. Crosslinked UvrD dimers also show highly processive DNA unwinding of thousands of base pairs, much higher than non-crosslinked UvrD dimers, while monomers show no DNA unwinding activity. DNA unwinding rates of crosslinked UvrD dimers are only [~]20% slower than ssDNA translocation rates, indicating they are "active" helicases that directly facilitate duplex destabilization.

biophysics↗

bioRxiv2023

Mycobacterium tuberculosis Ku stimulates multi-round DNA unwinding by UvrD1 monomers

Mycobacterium tuberculosis is the causative agent of Tuberculosis. During the host response to infection, the bacterium is exposed to both reactive oxygen species and nitrogen intermediates that can cause DNA damage. It is becoming clear that the DNA damage response in Mtb and related actinobacteria function via distinct pathways as compared to well-studied model bacteria. For example, we have previously shown that the DNA repair helicase UvrD1 is activated for processive unwinding via redox-dependent dimerization. In addition, mycobacteria contain a homo-dimeric Ku protein, homologous to the eukaryotic Ku70/Ku80 dimer, that plays roles in double-stranded break repair via non-homologous end-joining. Ku has been shown to stimulate the helicase activity of UvrD1, but the molecular mechanism, as well as which redox form of UvrD1 is activated, is unknown. We show here that Ku specifically stimulates multi-round unwinding by UvrD1 monomers which are able to slowly unwind DNA, but at rates 100-fold slower than the dimer. We also demonstrate that the UvrD1 C-terminal Tudor domain is required for the formation of a Ku-UvrD1 protein complex and activation. We show that Mtb Ku dimers bind with high nearest neighbor cooperativity to duplex DNA and that UvrD1 activation is observed when the DNA substrate is bound with two or three Ku dimers. Our observations reveal aspects of the interactions between DNA, Mtb Ku, and UvrD1 and highlight the potential role of UvrD1 in multiple DNA repair pathways through different mechanisms of activation. Declaration of Interests None

biophysics↗

bioRxiv2022

How Glutamate Promotes Liquid-liquid Phase Separation and DNA Binding Cooperativity of E. coli SSB Protein

E. coli single-stranded-DNA binding protein (EcSSB) displays nearest-neighbor (NN) and non-nearest-neighbor (NNN)) cooperativity in binding ssDNA during genome maintenance. NNN cooperativity requires the intrinsically-disordered linkers (IDL) of the C-terminal tails. Potassium glutamate (KGlu), the primary E. coli salt, promotes NNN-cooperativity, while KCl inhibits it. We find that KGlu promotes compaction of a single polymeric SSB-coated ssDNA beyond what occurs in KCl, indicating a link of compaction to NNN-cooperativity. EcSSB also undergoes liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS), inhibited by ssDNA binding. We find that LLPS, like NNN-cooperativity, is promoted by increasing [KGlu] in the physiological range, while increasing [KCl] and/or deletion of the IDL eliminate LLPS, indicating similar interactions in both processes. From quantitative determinations of interactions of KGlu and KCl with protein model compounds, we deduce that the opposing effects of KGlu and KCl on SSB LLPS and cooperativity arise from their opposite interactions with amide groups. KGlu interacts unfavorably with the backbone (especially Gly) and side chain amide groups of the IDL and therefore promotes amide-amide interactions in LLPS and NNN-cooperativity. By contrast, KCl interacts favorably with these amide groups and therefore inhibits LLPS and NNN-cooperativity. These results highlight the importance of salt interactions in regulating the propensity of proteins to undergo LLPS.

biochemistry↗

bioRxiv2020

Probing E. coli SSB Protein-DNA topology by reversing DNA backbone polarity

E. coli single strand (ss) DNA binding protein (SSB) is an essential protein that binds ssDNA intermediates formed during genome maintenance. SSB homo-tetramers bind ssDNA in two major modes differing in occluded site size and cooperativity. The (SSB)35 mode in which ssDNA wraps on average around two subunits is favored at low [NaCl] and high SSB to DNA ratios and displays high "unlimited", nearest-neighbor cooperativity forming long protein clusters. The (SSB)65 mode, in which ssDNA wraps completely around four subunits of the tetramer, is favored at higher [NaCl] (> 200 mM) and displays "limited" low cooperativity. Crystal structures of E. coli SSB and P. falciparum SSB show ssDNA bound to the SSB subunits (OB-folds) with opposite polarities of the sugar phosphate backbones. To investigate whether SSB subunits show a polarity preference for binding ssDNA, we examined EcSSB and PfSSB binding to a series of (dT)70 constructs in which the backbone polarity was switched in the middle of the DNA by incorporating a reverse polarity (RP) phosphodiester linkage, either 3-3 or 5-5. We find only minor effects on the DNA binding properties for these RP constructs, although (dT)70 with a 3-3 polarity switch shows decreased affinity for EcSSB in the (SSB)65 mode and lower cooperativity in the (SSB)35 mode. However, (dT)70 in which every phosphodiester linkage is reversed, does not form a completely wrapped (SSB)65 mode, but rather binds EcSSB in the (SSB)35 mode, with little cooperativity. In contrast, PfSSB, which binds ssDNA only in an (SSB)65 mode and with opposite backbone polarity and different topology, shows little effect of backbone polarity on its DNA binding properties. We present structural models suggesting that strict backbone polarity can be maintained for ssDNA binding to the individual OB-folds if there is a change in ssDNA wrapping topology of the RP ssDNA. Statement of SignificanceSingle stranded (ss) DNA binding (SSB) proteins are essential for genome maintenance. Usually homo-tetrameric, bacterial SSBs bind ssDNA in multiple modes, one of which involves wrapping 65 nucleotides of ssDNA around all four subunits. Crystal structures of E. coli and P. falciparum SSB-ssDNA complexes show ssDNA bound with different backbone polarity orientations raising the question of whether these SSBs maintain strict backbone polarity in binding ssDNA. We show that both E. coli and P. falciparum SSBs can still form high affinity fully wrapped complexes with non-natural DNA containing internal reversals of the backbone polarity. These results suggest that both proteins maintain a strict backbone polarity preference, but adopt an alternate ssDNA wrapping topology.

biophysics↗

bioRxiv2020

Comparative analysis of CPI-motif regulation of biochemical functions of actin capping protein

The heterodimeric actin capping protein (CP) is regulated by a set of proteins that contain CP-interacting (CPI) motifs. Outside of the CPI motif, the sequences of these proteins are unrelated and distinct. The CPI motif and surrounding sequences are conserved within a given protein family, when compared to those of other CPI-motif protein families. Using biochemical assays with purified proteins, we compared the ability of CPI-motif-containing peptides from different protein families to a) bind to CP, b) allosterically inhibit barbed-end capping by CP, and c) allosterically inhibit interaction of CP with V-1, another regulator of CP. We found large differences in potency among the different CPI-motif-containing peptides, and the different functional assays showed different orders of potency. These biochemical differences among the CPI-motif peptides presumably reflect interactions between CP and CPI-motif peptides involving amino-acid residues that are conserved but are not part of the strictly defined consensus, as it was originally identified in comparisons of sequences of CPI motifs(1, 2) across all protein families (1, 2). These biochemical differences may be important for conserved distinct functions of CPI-motif protein families in cells with respect to the regulation of CP activity and actin assembly near membranes.

biochemistry↗