Search bioRxivSearch

Biology subjects

Kopell, N.

Publications and source records attributed to Kopell, N..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Muscarinic receptors regulate auditory and prefrontal cortical communication during auditory processing

Much of our understanding about how acetylcholine modulates prefrontal cortical (PFC) networks comes from behavioral experiments that examine cortical dynamics during highly attentive states. However, much less is known about how PFC is recruited during passive sensory processing and how acetylcholine may regulate connectivity between cortical areas outside of task performance. To investigate the involvement of PFC and cholinergic neuromodulation in passive auditory processing, we performed simultaneous recordings in the auditory cortex (AC) and PFC in awake head fixed mice presented with a white noise auditory stimulus in the presence or absence of local cholinergic antagonists in AC. We found that a subset of PFC neurons were strongly driven by auditory stimuli even when the stimulus had no associative meaning, suggesting PFC monitors stimuli under passive conditions. We also found that cholinergic signaling in AC shapes the strength of auditory driven response in PFC, by modulating the intra-cortical sensory response through muscarinic interactions in AC. Taken together, these findings provide novel evidence that cholinergic mechanisms have a continuous role in cortical gating through muscarinic receptors during passive processing and expand traditional views of prefrontal cortical function and the contributions of cholinergic modulation in sensory gating.\n\nHighlightsO_LIPrefrontal cortex actively monitors non-associative stimuli under passive conditions\nC_LIO_LIAcetylcholine facilitates cortical signaling even outside of attentional contexts\nC_LIO_LILocal scopolamine infusion reduced intracortical signaling and impaired cortical gating\nC_LIO_LImAChR have an ongoing role in sound processing\nC_LI

neuroscience

Biased competition in the absence of input bias: predictions from corticostriatal computation

Classical accounts of biased competition (BC) require an input bias to resolve the competition between neuronal ensembles driving downstream processing. However, flexible and reliable selection of behaviorally-relevant ensembles can occur with unbiased stimulation: striatal D1 and D2 spiny projecting neurons (SPNs) receive balanced cortical input, yet their activity determines the choice between GO and NO-GO pathways in the basal ganglia. We present a corticostriatal model identifying three mechanisms that rely on physiological asymmetries to effect rate- and time-coded BC in the presence of balanced inputs. First, tonic input strength determines which SPN phenotype exhibit higher mean firing rate (FR). Second, low strength oscillatory inputs induce higher FR in D2 SPNs but higher coherence between D1 SPNs. Third, high strength inputs oscillating at distinct frequencies preferentially activate D1 or D2 SPN populations. Of these mechanisms, the latter accommodates observed rhythmic activity supporting rule-based decision making in prefrontal cortex.

neuroscience