Biology subjects

Kop, B. R.

Publications and source records attributed to Kop, B. R..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2025

Parameter optimisation for mitigating somatosensory confounds during transcranial ultrasonic stimulation

Transcranial ultrasonic stimulation (TUS) redefines what is possible with non-invasive neuromodulation by oaering unparalleled spatial precision and flexible targeting capabilities. However, peripheral confounds pose a significant challenge to reliably implementing this technology. While auditory confounds during TUS have been studied extensively, the somatosensory confound has been overlooked thus far. It will become increasingly vital to quantify and manage this confound as the field shifts towards higher doses, more compact stimulation devices, and more frequent stimulation through the temple where co-stimulation is more pronounced. Here, we provide a systematic characterisation of somatosensory co-stimulation during TUS. We also identify the conditions under which this confound can be mitigated most eaectively by mapping the confound-parameter space. Specifically, we investigate dose-response eaects, pulse shaping characteristics, and transducer-specific parameters. We demonstrate that somatosensory confounds can be mitigated by avoiding near-field intensity peaks in the scalp, spreading energy across a greater area of the scalp, ramping the pulse envelope, and delivering equivalent doses via longer, lower-intensity pulses rather than shorter, higher-intensity pulses. Additionally, higher pulse repetition frequencies and fundamental frequencies reduce somatosensory eaects. Through our systematic mapping of the parameter space, we also find preliminary evidence that particle displacement (strain) may be a primary biophysical driving force behind peripheral somatosensory co-stimulation. This study provides actionable strategies to minimise somatosensory confounds, which will support the thorough experimental control required to unlock the full potential of TUS for scientific research and clinical interventions. Highlights- Tactile, thermal, and even painful somatosensory confounds may occur during TUS. - Confounds can be mitigated via pulse shaping & transducer-specific parameters. - Valid and replicable TUS research requires control for peripheral confounds. - Particle displacement may be a primary driving force for somatosensory confounds.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2025

Rapid modulation of choice behavior by ultrasound on the human frontal eye fields

A fundamental challenge in neuroscience is establishing causal brain-function relationships with spatial and temporal precision. Transcranial ultrasonic stimulation (TUS) offers a unique opportunity to modulate deep brain structures non-invasively with high spatial resolution, but temporally precise effects and their neurophysiological foundations have yet to be demonstrated in humans. Here, we develop a temporally precise TUS protocol targeting the frontal eye fields (FEFs) -- a well-characterized circuit critical for saccadic eye movements. We demonstrate that TUS induces robust excitatory behavioral effects. Importantly, individual differences in baseline GABAergic inhibitory tone predict response magnitude. These findings establish TUS as a reliable tool for chronometric circuit interrogation and highlight the importance of neurophysiological state in neuromodulation. This work bridges human and animal research, advancing targeted TUS applications in neuroscience and clinical settings. HighlightsO_LIFocused ultrasound modulates saccades with high spatial and temporal precision C_LIO_LIInhibitory circuits in the frontal eye fields shape choice computations C_LIO_LIGABA levels predict individual variability in ultrasound-induced behavioral changes C_LIO_LIUltrasound can be used to probe fast neural dynamics and individual differences C_LI

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2024

Failed Double-Blind Replication of Offline 5Hz-rTUS-Induced Corticospinal Excitability

IntroductionTranscranial ultrasound stimulation (TUS) is a promising new form of non-invasive neuromodulation. As a nascent technique, replication of its effects on brain function is important. Of particular interest is offline 5Hz repetitive TUS (5Hz-rTUS), originally reported by Zeng and colleagues [1] to elicit lasting corticospinal excitability increases, with large effect sizes. Material and methodHere, we conducted a pre-registered (https://osf.io/p5n4q) replication of this protocol that benefitted from three additional features: double-blind application of TUS, neuronavigation for consistent TMS positioning, and acoustic simulations to assess M1 target exposure to TUS. Changes in resting motor thresholds (rMT), motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitude, short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) in response to TUS (5Hz-rTUS vs. sham) were measured in the right first dorsal interosseous (FDI), abductor digiti minimi (ADM) and abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscles, with unbiased selection of participants. Transducer location was determined by the TMS-hotspot for motor representations of the right FDI, as in the original work. ResultsNo significant effects of 5Hz-TUS (vs sham) were observed. Post-hoc simulations showed considerable variability of the acoustic focus, which was outside the anatomical M1-hand area in 67% of participants - in line with the known poor correspondence of TMS-hotspot location and M1-hand area. ConclusionOur results indicate that the effect sizes of the neuromodulatory effects of 5Hz-rTUS on M1 may be more variable than previously appreciated. We suggest that double-blinding, neuronavigated TMS, individualised acoustic simulations for TUS targeting and pre-registration will aid reproducibility across studies.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2023

Auditory confounds can drive online effects of transcranial ultrasonic stimulation in humans

Transcranial ultrasonic stimulation (TUS) is rapidly emerging as a promising non-invasive neuromodulation technique. TUS is already well-established in animal models, providing foundations to now optimize neuromodulatory efficacy for human applications. Across multiple studies, one promising protocol, pulsed at 1000 Hz, has consistently resulted in motor cortical inhibition in humans (Fomenko et al., 2020). At the same time, a parallel research line has highlighted the potentially confounding influence of peripheral auditory stimulation arising from TUS pulsing at audible frequencies. In this study, we disentangle direct neuromodulatory and indirect auditory contributions to motor inhibitory effects of TUS. To this end, we include tightly matched control conditions across four experiments, one preregistered, conducted independently at three institutions. We employed a combined transcranial ultrasonic and magnetic stimulation paradigm, where TMS-elicited motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) served as an index of corticospinal excitability. First, we replicated motor inhibitory effects of TUS but showed through both tight controls and manipulation of stimulation intensity, duration, and auditory masking conditions that this inhibition was driven by peripheral auditory stimulation, not direct neuromodulation. Further, we consider neuromodulation beyond driving overall excitation/inhibition and show preliminary evidence of how TUS might interact with ongoing neural dynamics instead. Primarily, this study highlights the substantial shortcomings in accounting for the auditory confound in prior TUS-TMS work where only a flip-over sham and no active control was used. The field must critically reevaluate previous findings given the demonstrated impact of peripheral confounds. Further, rigorous experimental design via (in)active control conditions is required to make substantiated claims in future TUS studies. Only when direct effects are disentangled from those driven by peripheral confounds can TUS fully realize its potential for research and clinical applications.

neuroscience↗