Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Komogortsev, O.

Publications and source records attributed to Komogortsev, O..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Changes in Ocular Fixation Characteristics Over Time during Reading

In this report, we evaluate eye-movements during reading. There is a huge literature on this topic, but our report is not focused on the typical questions raised in this literature and our task design is very atypical for an eye-movement/reading study. While most reading studies evaluate mental processes during reading, the only mental process we evaluate is fatigue. While most reading studies use stimuli presented in the middle of the screen, our poem sections are presented in 24 lines of text that span the top to the bottom of the display. While most multi-line reading studies use a very large interline spacing, our interline spacing is more typical of text reading in newspapers, magazines and books. We report on changes in the characteristics of fixations as a function of time-on-task (TOT). We determine the start and end of reading for each subject/session and divide this reading time into 10 equal length (number of samples) periods (referred to as epochs). We looked for changes in fixation characteristics across epochs. We emphasize our results for horizontal position because these changes were monotonic and interpretable. For horizontal position signals, we found that the mean intersample distances in fixations increases, the rate of changes of fixation position decreases and the total fixation width increases as a function of epoch. We interpret our results to mean that, as reading progresses, it becomes more difficult to hold the eye still. Early in reading, the total fixation width is lower, the mean intersample distance is lower and there are frequent adjustments (i.e., changes in direction) to keep the eye well focused on the target word. As time progresses, it becomes more and more difficult to hold the eye perfectly steady, so fixations become wider and mean intersample distance increases.

neuroscience↗

Motor "laziness" constrains fixation selection in real-world tasks

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWPeople coordinate their eye, head, and body movements to gather information from a dynamic environment while maximizing reward and minimizing biomechanical and energetic costs. Such natural behavior is not possible in a laboratory setting where the head and body are usually restrained and the tasks and stimuli used often lack ecological validity. Therefore, its unclear to what extent principles of fixation selection derived from lab studies, such as inhibition-of-return (IOR), apply in a real-world setting. To address this gap, participants performed nine real-world tasks, including driving, grocery shopping, and building a lego set, while wearing a mobile eye tracker (169 recordings; 26.6 hours). Surprisingly, spatial and temporal IOR were absent in all tasks. Instead, participants most often returned to what they just viewed, and saccade latencies were shorter preceding return than forward saccades. We hypothesized that participants minimize the time their eyes spend in an eccentric position to conserve eye and head motor effort. Correspondingly, we observed center biases in the distributions of fixation location and duration, relative to the heads orientation. A model that generates scanpaths by randomly sampling these distributions reproduced the spatial and temporal return phenomena seen in the data, including distinct 3-fixation sequences for forward versus return saccades. The amount of the orbit used in each task traded off with fixation duration, as if both incur costs in the same space. Conservation of effort ("laziness") explains all these behaviors, demonstrating that motor costs shape how people extract and act on relevant visual information from the environment. Significance StatementHumans display remarkably precise yet flexible control of eye and body movements, allowing for a wide range of activities. However, most studies of gaze behavior use the same setup: a head-restrained participant views small images on a computer. Such lab studies find that people avoid looking at the same thing twice, and hesitate in cases when they do. We had people perform nine everyday activities while wearing glasses with embedded eye tracking, and surprisingly found that they did the opposite, often returning to what they just viewed and expediting these "return" eye movements over others. A tendency to keep the eyes centered in the head, which we speculate helps to conserve motor effort, explained these behaviors for all tasks.

neuroscience↗