Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Kolle, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Kolle, S..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Coral Guard substrates accelerate growth and fragment fusion for coral restoration

Coral reefs are declining globally, creating an urgent need for scalable technologies that improve the efficiency and effectiveness of active reef restoration. Coral reef restoration is increasingly constrained by algal overgrowth, which suppresses coral growth, survival, and restoration efficiency. Building on the recently developed Coral Guard platform, we evaluate its restoration performance under long-term in situ coral nursery conditions and introduce Fusion Guard Tiles, a geometry-optimized Coral Guard design that accelerates microfragment fusion. We evaluated Coral Guard Plugs using the branching coral Stylophora pistillata under complementary ex situ conditions and Fusion Guard Tiles using the massive reef-building coral Porites evermanni in in situ coral nurseries. In P. evermanni, Fusion Guard Tiles increased lateral tissue growth 2.6-fold and three-dimensional tissue surface area growth by >2.7-fold after 6 months compared with conventional substrates. After 12 months, colony height and volume were approximately 4.0-fold and 2.2-fold greater, respectively, while complete fragment fusion occurred only on Fusion Guard Tiles. In S. pistillata, Coral Guard Plugs increased lateral tissue growth by [~]1.7-fold. Microcomputed tomography revealed 10-13% higher skeletal density in both species. In P. evermanni, Fusion Guard Tiles also increased symbiont density by 70% and tissue protein content by [~]2.5-fold relative to controls. Together, these findings demonstrate that Coral Guard substrates suppress algal competition while accelerating coral growth, skeletal development, and microfragment fusion, providing a scalable, low-maintenance technology to enhance coral nursery productivity and reef restoration.

bioengineering↗

Retrospective Evaluation of the Eye Irritation Potential of Agrochemical Formulations

While multiple in vitro eye irritation methods have been developed and adopted as OECD health effects test guidelines, only one is considered a complete replacement for the in vivo rabbit eye test for classification and labelling for eye irritation hazard. Additionally, for most of the adopted methods there is a data gap on the applicability to predict the ocular irritation potential of agrochemical formulations. To overcome this data gap, a retrospective evaluation of 192 agrochemical formulations with in vivo (OECD TG 405) or in vitro (OECD TG 437, 439, or 492) data was conducted to determine if the in vitro methods could accurately assign United Nations Globally Harmonized System for Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) eye irritation hazard classifications. In addition, for each of the final formulations and their individual components, we also conducted an evaluation of the GHS concentration threshold (CT) approach. The results herein suggest that the four individual methods and GHS CT approach were highly predictive of formulations that would not require classification for eye irritation hazard. Given most agrochemical formulations fall into this category, methods that accurately identify not classified mixtures could significantly reduce the use of animals for this endpoint.

pharmacology and toxicology↗