Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Kolde, R.

Publications and source records attributed to Kolde, R..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Population Structure Discovery in Meta-Analyzed Microbial Communities and Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Microbial community studies in general, and of the human microbiome in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in particular, have now achieved a scale at which it is practical to associate features of the microbiome with environmental exposures and health outcomes across multiple large-scale populations. This permits the development of rigorous meta-analysis methods, of particular importance in IBD as a means by which the heterogeneity of disease etiology and treatment response might be explained. We have thus developed MMUPHin (Meta-analysis Methods with a Uniform Pipeline for Heterogeneity in microbiome studies) for joint normalization, meta-analysis, and population structure discovery using microbial community taxonomic and functional profiles. Applying this method to ten IBD cohorts (5,151 total samples), we identified a single consistent axis of microbial associations among studies, including newly associated taxa such as Acinetobacter and Turicibacter detected due to the sensitivity of meta-analysis. Linear random effects models further revealed associations with medications, disease location, and interaction effects consistent within and between studies. Finally, multiple unsupervised clustering metrics and dissimilarity measures agreed on a lack of discrete microbiome "types" in the IBD gut microbiome. These results thus provide a benchmark for consistent characterization of the IBD gut microbiome and a general framework applicable to meta-analysis of any microbial community types.

genomics↗

A novel core genome approach to enable prospective and dynamic monitoring of infectious outbreaks

Whole-genome sequencing is increasingly adopted in clinical settings to identify pathogen transmissions. Currently, such studies are performed largely retrospectively, but to be actionable they need to be carried out prospectively, in which samples are continuously added and compared to previous samples. To enable prospective pathogen comparison, genomic relatedness metrics based on single nucleotide differences must be consistent across time, efficient to compute and reliable for a large variety of samples. The choice of genomic regions to compare, i.e., the core genome, is critical to obtain a good metric.\n\nWe propose a novel core genome method that selects conserved sequences in the reference genome by comparing its k-mer content to that of publicly available genome assemblies. The conserved-sequence genome is sample set-independent, which enables prospective pathogen monitoring. Based on clinical data sets of 3436 S. aureus, 1362 K. pneumoniae and 348 E. faecium samples, we show that the conserved-sequence genome disambiguates same-patient samples better than a core genome consisting of conserved genes. The conserved-sequence genome confirms outbreak samples with high accuracy: in a set of 2335 S. aureus samples, it correctly identifies 44 out of 45 outbreak samples, whereas the conserved gene method confirms 38 out of 45 outbreak samples.

bioinformatics↗