Kokai, E. | Search bioRxiv

bioRxiv2023

KDM4-dependent DNA breaks at active promoters facilitate +1 nucleosome eviction

When the effect of various posttranslational histone tail modifications (PTMs) on nucleosome stability was compared in an in situ assay involving agarose-embedded nuclei, the promoter proximal H3K4me3, H3K27ac and H4K8ac positive nucleosomes exhibited relative sensitivity to intercalators as compared to bulk H3-GFP or nucleosomes carrying any of the following marks: H3K27me1, H3K27me2, H3K27me3, H3K9me1, H3K9me2, H3K9me3, H3K36me3, H3K4me0, H3K4me1, H3K4me2, H3K9ac, and H3K14ac. Nickase or DNase I treatment of the nuclei, or bleomycin treatment of live cells, did not affect the stability of nucleosomes carrying H3K4me3 or H3K27ac, while those of the second group were all destabilized upon treatment with intercalators. These observations support the possibility that the promoter proximal marks specify dynamic nucleosomes accomodating relaxed DNA sequences due to DNA breaks generated in vivo. In line with this interpretation, endogeneous, 3OH nicks were mapped within the nucleosome free region of promoters controlling genes active in human mononuclear cells, a conclusion supported by superresolution colocalization studies. The +1 nucleosomes were stabilized and the incidence of nicks was decreased at the promoters upon KDM4a,b,c KO induction (Pedersen et al, EMBO J, 2016) in mouse embryonic stem cells (mES). While etoposide did not further destabilize +1 nucleosomes in control mES, their stabilized state in the KO state was reversed by the drug. A significant fraction of the DNA breaks comprises TOP2-generated nicks according to the results of molecular combing experiments. The chromatin regions harboring nicks are topologicaly separated from the domains containing superhelical chromatin. These observations lend support for a model where the role of DNA strand discontinuities in transcriptional regulation and in higher-order chromatin organization are integrated.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2023

Calretinin-expressing islet cells: a source of pre- and post-synaptic inhibition of non-peptidergic nociceptor input to the mouse spinal cord

Unmyelinated non-peptidergic nociceptors (NP afferents) arborise in lamina II of the spinal cord and receive GABAergic axoaxonic synapses, which mediate presynaptic inhibition. However, until now the source of this axoaxonic synaptic input was not known. Here we provide evidence that it originates from a population of inhibitory calretinin-expressing interneurons (iCRs), which correspond to lamina II islet cells. The NP afferents can be assigned to 3 functionally distinct classes (NP1-3). NP1 afferents have been implicated in pathological pain states, while NP2 and NP3 afferents also function as pruritoceptors. Our findings suggest that all 3 of these afferent types innervate iCRs and receive axoaxonic synapses from them, providing feedback inhibition of NP input. The iCRs also form axodendritic synapses, and their targets include cells that are themselves innervated by the NP afferents, thus allowing for feedforward inhibition. The iCRs are therefore ideally placed to control the input from non-peptidergic nociceptors and pruritoceptors to other dorsal horn neurons, and thus represent a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of chronic pain and itch.

neuroscience↗