Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Kohler, R.

Publications and source records attributed to Kohler, R..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Distinct associations between multimodal brain measures and psychopathology domains predict adolescent functioning

Adolescent psychopathology is partly rooted in measurable disruptions across key neural networks, yet the field still lacks an integrated, multimodal understanding of these brain-behavior links. Here, we examined how structural, microstructural, and functional measures across corticostriatal, corticolimbic, and executive control networks relate to psychopathology domains and explored how these associations predicted future psychosocial functioning. We used data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive DevelopmentSM Study (n=5,408) and ran a regularized canonical correlation analysis to identify distinct modes of covariation between multiple brain measures and psychopathology domains when youth were 13-14 years old. The resulting canonical brain and psychopathology scores were used to predict school-related impairment one year later. First, higher diffusivity and decreased activation during a reward task across all three networks as well as lower corticostriatal surface area were related to higher broad psychopathology. Second, lower corticolimbic diffusivity, executive control volume and surface area, and cortical thickness across all three networks as well as higher corticostriatal and corticolimbic volumes were related to higher anxiety but lower externalizing. For the first mode, higher psychopathology scores predicted more school-related impairment one year later. For the second mode, higher brain and higher psychopathology scores predicted less school-related impairment one year later. Identifying how specific neural measures align with psychopathology domains, as well as how both forecast reallilworld functioning, advances the conceptualization of adolescent mental health. This approach clarifies which levels of analysis provide distinct versus shared information about youth functioning and highlights potential mechanisms that may inform future targets for change.

neuroscience↗

A Multidimensional Approach to Understanding the Emergence of Sex Differences in Internalizing Symptoms in Adolescence

Women are more vulnerable to internalizing disorders (e.g., depression and anxiety). This study took an integrative, developmental approach to investigate multidimensional factors associated with the emergence of sex differences in internalizing symptoms, using data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study. Indices of sex hormone levels (dehydroepiandrosterone, testosterone, and estradiol), physical pubertal development, task-based functional brain activity, family conflict, and internalizing symptoms were drawn from the ABCD studys baseline sample (9-to 10-year-old; N = 11,844). Principal component analysis served as a data-driven dimensionality reduction technique on the internalizing subscales to yield a single robust measure of internalizing symptoms. Moderated mediation analyses assessed whether associations between known risk factors and internalizing symptoms vary by sex. Results revealed direct and indirect effects of physical pubertal development on internalizing symptoms through family conflict across sexes. No effects were found of sex hormone levels or amygdala response to fearful faces on internalizing symptoms. Females did not report overall greater internalizing symptoms relative to males, suggesting that internalizing symptoms have not yet begun to increase in females at this age. Findings provide an essential baseline for future longitudinal research on the endocrine, neurocognitive, and psychosocial factors associated with sex differences in internalizing symptoms.

neuroscience↗