Biology subjects

Koffel, T.

Publications and source records attributed to Koffel, T..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2022

A general framework for species-abundance distributions: linking traits and dispersal to explain commonness and rarity

Species-abundance distributions (SADs) describe the spectrum of commonness and rarity in a community. Beyond the universal observation that most species are rare and only a few common, more-precise description of SAD shape is controversial. Furthermore, the mechanisms behind SADs and how they vary along environmental gradients remain unresolved. We lack a general non-neutral theory of SADs. Here we develop a trait-based framework, focusing on a local community coupled to the region by dispersal. The balance of immigration and exclusion determines abundances, which vary over orders-of-magnitude. Under stabilizing selection, the local trait-abundance distribution (TAD) reflects a transformation of the regional TAD. The left-tail of the SAD depends on scaling exponents of the exclusion function and the regional species pool. More-complex local dynamics can lead to multimodal TADs and SADs. Connecting SADs with trait-based ecological theory provides a way to generate more-testable hypotheses on the controls over commonness and rarity in communities.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2021

A general theoretical framework for trait-based eco-evolutionary dynamics: population structure, intraspecific variation, and community assembly

To understand how functional traits shape ecological communities it is necessary to understand both how traits across the community affect its functioning and how eco-evolutionary dynamics within the community change the traits over time. Of particular interest are so-called evolutionarily stable communities (ESCs), since these are the end points of eco-evolutionary dynamics and can persist over long time scales. One theoretical framework that has successfully been used for assembling ESCs is adaptive dynamics. However, this framework cannot account for intraspecific variation-- neither locally nor across structured populations. On the other hand, in moment-based approaches, intraspecific variation is accommodated, but community assembly has been neglected. This is unfortunate as some questions regarding for example local adaptation vis-a-vis diversification into multiple species requires both facets. In this paper we develop a general theoretical framework that bridges the gap between these two approaches. We showcase how ESCs can be assembled using the framework, and illustrate various aspects of the framework using two simple models of resource competition. We believe this unifying framework could be of great use to address questions regarding the role of functional traits in communities where population structure, intraspecific variation, and eco-evolutionary dynamics are all important.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2020

Modeling How Community Assembly Alters the Functioning of Ecosystems

Although the effects of species richness on ecosystem functioning have been extensively studied, there is increased interest in understanding how community assembly in general might alter the functioning of ecosystems. We focus on two complementary approaches for evaluating how community assembly influences ecosystem function (here, productivity). The first quantifies the relative importance of complementarity and selection by contrasting monocultures with polycultures. The second identifies the effects of species losses and/or gains relative to the baseline polyculture, as well as the indirect effects on other species productivity. We evaluate and contrast these two approaches, using simulated communities structured by different, known competition mechanisms, where species compete for different resources and experience varying levels of environmental heterogeneity. We find that the metrics provided by these approaches can jointly discriminate the mechanisms of competition driving productivity. We then apply our methods to data from a long-term biodiversity-ecosystem experiment (the Jena Experiment) and find that the data do not correspond to any of the competition scenarios we modeled. We address two additional possible complications: facilitation by nitrogen fixing plants, and non-equilibrium behavior during community assembly, and find that a combination of resource competition and facilitation by nitrogen fixing plants is the more likely explanation for the results obtained at Jena.

ecology↗