Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Kirby, A. C.

Publications and source records attributed to Kirby, A. C..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Mucosal tissue NK cells tune their function between optimal anti-pathogen activity and tissue protection

Preserving barrier integrity while mounting effective immunity is essential at mucosal surfaces. In examining the immune cells that mediate both inflammation and tissue homeostasis, we uncovered a dual role for natural killer (NK) cells in barrier immunity. While NK cells are known to control viral infections, here we identify a previously unrecognized reparative function for NK cells in mucosal tissues. Using single-cell RNA sequencing and high-dimensional flow cytometry, we reveal a distinct population of human mucosal NK cells marked by tissue residency, immunoregulatory profiles, and limited cytotoxic potential at homeostasis, yet highly responsive to inflammatory cues. In a mouse model of acute HSV-2 infection, NK cells are required for limiting infection-associated tissue damage. Mucosal NK cells express the epithelial growth factor amphiregulin (Areg), and their depletion leads to increased tissue barrier damage despite preserved viral clearance, suggesting a novel role in tissue protection. Mechanistically, we demonstrate that the barrier-derived cytokines IL-18 and IL-33 induce Areg expression by both human and mouse NK cells, linking local inflammatory cues to reparative NK cell programming that is able to potentiate wound healing. Together, our findings reveal a context-dependent, dual function of mucosal NK cells in immune defense and mucosal tissue protection, expanding current models of NK cell biology.

immunology↗

Cryopreservation of human mucosal tissues

BACKGROUNDCryopreservation of leukocytes isolated from the cervicovaginal and colorectal mucosa is useful for the study of cellular immunity (see Hughes SM et al. PLOS ONE 2016). However, some questions about mucosal biology and sexually transmitted infections are better addressed with intact mucosal tissue, for which there is no standard cryopreservation protocol.\n\nMETHODS AND FINDINGSTo find an optimal preservation protocol for mucosal tissues, we tested slow cooling (1%C/min) with 10% dimethylsulfoxide (designated \"cryopreservation\") and fast cooling (plunge in liquid nitrogen) with 20% dimethylsulfoxide and 20% ethylene glycol (\"vitrification\"). We compared fresh and preserved human cervicovaginal and colorectal tissues in a range of assays, including metabolic activity, human immunodeficiency virus infection, cell phenotype, tissue structure by hematoxylin-and-eosin staining, cell number and viability, production of cytokines, and microbicide drug concentrations. Metabolic activity, HIV infectability, and tissue structure were similar in cryopreserved and vitrified vaginal tissues. However, vitrification led to poor cell recovery from the colorectal mucosa, with 90% fewer cells recovered after isolation from vitrified colorectal tissues than from cryopreserved. HIV infection rates were similar for fresh and cryopreserved ectocervical tissues, whereas cryopreserved colorectal tissues were less easily infected than fresh tissues (hazard ratio 0.7 [95% confidence interval 0.4, 1.2]). Finally, we compared isolation of cells before and after cryopreservation. Cell recoveries were higher when cells were isolated after freezing and thawing (71% [59-84%]) than before (50% [38-62%]). Cellular function was similar to fresh tissue in both cases. Microbicide drug concentrations were lower in cryopreserved explants compared to fresh ones.\n\nCONCLUSIONSCryopreservation of intact cervicovaginal and colorectal tissues with dimethylsulfoxide works well in a range of assays, while the utility of vitrification is more limited. Cell yields are higher from cryopreserved intact tissue pieces than from thawed cryopreserved single cell suspensions isolated before freezing, but T cell functions are similar.

immunology↗