Biology subjects

Kingsley, D.

Publications and source records attributed to Kingsley, D..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2023

Fine-scale contemporary recombination variation and its fitness consequences in adaptively diverging stickleback fish

Despite deep evolutionary conservation, recombination varies greatly across the genome, among individuals, sexes, and populations and can be a major evolutionary force in the wild. Yet this variation in recombination and its impact on adaptively diverging populations is not well understood. To elucidate the nature and potential consequences of recombination rate variation, we characterized fine-scale recombination landscapes by combining pedigrees, functional genomics and field fitness measurements in an adaptively divergent pair of marine and freshwater threespine stickleback populations from River Tyne, Scotland. Through whole-genome sequencing of large nuclear families, we identified the genomic location of almost 50,000 crossovers and built recombination maps for 36 marine, freshwater, and hybrid individuals at 3.8 kilobase resolution. Using these maps, we quantified the factors driving variation in recombination rate: we find strong heterochiasmy between sexes (68% of the variation) but also differences among ecotypes (21.8%). Hybrids show evidence of significant recombination suppression, both in overall map length and in individual loci. We further tested and found reduced recombination rates both within single marine-freshwater adaptive loci and between loci on the same chromosome, suggestive of selection on linked cassettes . We tested theory supporting the evolution of linked selection using temporal sampling along a natural hybrid zone, and found that recombinants with shuffled alleles across loci show traits associated with reduced fitness. Our results support predictions that divergence in cis-acting recombination modifiers whose mechanisms are disrupted in hybrids, may have an important role to play in the maintenance of differences among adaptively diverging populations.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2021

Free for all, or free-for-all? A content analysis of Australian university open access policies

Recent research demonstrates that Australia lags in providing open access to research outputs. In Australia, while the two major research funding bodies require open access of outputs from projects they fund, these bodies only fund a small proportion of research conducted. The major source of research and experimental development funding in Australian higher education is general university, or institutional, funding, and such funds are not subject to national funder open access policies. Thus, institutional policies and other institutional supports for open access are important in understanding Australias OA position. The purpose of this paper is, therefore, to understand the characteristics of Australian institutional open access policies and to explore the extent they represent a coherent and unified approach to delivering and promoting open access in Australia. Open access policies were located using a systematic web search approach and then their contents were analysed. Only half of Australian universities were found to have an open access policy. There was a wide variation in language used, expressed intent of the policy and expectations of researchers. Few policies mention monitoring or compliance and only three mention consequences for non-compliance. While it is understandable that institutions develop their own policies, when language is used which does not reflect national and international understandings, when requirements are not clear and with consequences, policies are unlikely to contribute to understanding of open access, to uptake of the policy, or to ease of transferring understanding and practices between institutions. A more unified approach to open access is recommended.

scientific communication and education↗

bioRxiv2017

Creating a Community of Data Champions

Research Data Management (RDM) presents an unusual challenge for service providers in Higher Education. There is increased awareness of the need for training in this area but the nature of discipline-specific practices involved make it difficult to provide training across a multi-disciplinary organisation. Whilst most UK universities now have a research data team of some description, they are often small and rarely have the resources necessary to provide targeted training to the different disciplines and research career stages that they are increasingly expected to support.\n\nThis practice paper describes the approach taken at the University of Cambridge to address this problem by creating a community of Data Champions. This collaborative initiative, working with researchers to provide training and advocacy for good RDM practice, allows for more discipline-specific training to be given, researchers to be credited for their expertise and an opportunity for those interested in RDM to exchange knowledge with others. The community of practice model has been used in many sectors, including Higher Education, to facilitate collaboration across organisational units and this initiative will adopt some of the same principles to improve communication across a decentralised institution. The Data Champions initiative at Cambridge was launched in September 2016 and this paper reports on the early months, plans for building the community in the future and the possible risks associated with this approach to providing RDM services.

scientific communication and education↗

bioRxiv2017

Is Democracy the Right System? Collaborative Approaches to Building an Engaged RDM Community

When developing new products, tools or services, one always need to think about the end users to ensure a wide-spread adoption. While this applies equally to services developed at higher education institutions, sometimes these services are driven by policies and not by needs of end users. This policy-driven approach can prove challenging for building effective community engagement. The initial development of Research Data Management support services at the University of Cambridge was policy-driven and subsequently failed in the first instance to engage the community of researchers for whom these services were created.\n\nIn this practice paper we will describe the initial approach undertaken at Cambridge when developing RDM services, the results of this approach and lessons learnt. We will then provide an overview of alternative, democratic strategies employed and their positive effects on community engagement. We will summarise by performing a cost-benefit analysis of the two approaches. This paper might be a useful case study for any institutions aiming to develop central support services for researchers, with conclusions applicable to the wide sector, and extending beyond Research Data Management services.

scientific communication and education↗

bioRxiv2016

Starting from the end: what to do when restricted data is released

Repository managers can never be one hundred percent sure of the security ofhosted research data. Even assuming that human errors and technical faults will never happen, repositories can be subject to hacking attacks. Therefore, repositories accepting personal/sensitive data (or other forms of restricted data) should have workflows in place with defined procedures to be followed should things go wrong and restricted data is inappropriately released. In this paper wewill report on our considerations and procedures when restricted data from ourinstitution was inappropriately released.

scientific communication and education↗