Biology subjects

Kingdon, K. A.

Publications and source records attributed to Kingdon, K. A..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2024

Evidence for optimal behavior of predators from parallel field investigations in two distinct wolf-prey systems

Animals behave optimally when they minimize their costs while maximizing their energetic gain. Optimal foraging theory predicts that with decreasing resource abundance, animals will increase 1) niche breadth, 2) territory size and movement distance, and 3) time spent at resource patches. We test these predictions by investigating clusters from GPS collared wolves (Canis lupus) in two predator populations with marked differences in their prey composition and abundance. As expected, wolves in a less abundant system increase niche breadth, territory size, step lengths, and time spent at each kill. Our work provides evidence of optimal behavior in an apex predator which can support population resilience across changing landscapes.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2024

Movement-integrated habitat selection reveals wolves balance ease of travel with human avoidance in a risk-reward trade-off

Anthropogenic linear features are often linked to alterations in wildlife behaviour and movement. Landscape features such as habitat can have important mediating effects on wildlife response to disturbance and yet is rarely explicitly considered in how it interacts with other features. This study tests the effects of habitat variation on the space-use responses of GPS-collared wolves to linear features in eastern Manitoba. We simultaneously model wolf movement and selection within a conditional logistic regression framework (integrated Step Selection Analysis) with explicit consideration for how habitat alters these responses through either added cover or friction to movement. Classifying linear features based on the selection and movement response of wolves revealed that pairing transmission lines and primary roads increased the avoidance response to be greater than either feature on their own and provided evidence of a semi-permeable barrier to movement. In contrast, features with reduced human activity, including secondary and tertiary roads were highly selected for and provided access to movement corridors. Explicit parameterization of habitat provides evidence that where a linear feature is routed and which habitats it interacts with will have the greatest implications for wolf behavioural responses. Reduction of avoidance behavioural in highly risky environments signifies the importance of habitat for maintaining landscape connectivity, particularly when routing multiple features together. Natural regrowth along these features reduced movement advantages by increasing friction, indicating that actively decommissioning other features such as secondary roads would have important implications for reducing wolf encounters with prey. Knowing the influence of adjacent habitats on the likelihood of wolves selecting for a given linear feature creates context to minimize the impact of new anthropogenic features on behaviour.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2021

Death comes for us all: an interplay of habitat selection, movement, and social behavior relate to cause specific mortality among grey wolves

Avoiding death infects biological processes, including behavior. Habitat selection, movement, and sociality are highly flexible behaviors that influence the mortality risks and subsequent fitness of individuals. In the Anthropocene, animals are experiencing increased risks from direct human causes and increased spread of infectious diseases. Using integrated step selection analysis, we tested how the habitat selection, movement, and social behaviors of grey wolves vary as an individual dies due to humans or canine distemper virus (CDV) and how those behaviors may vary in the lead up to death. Behaviors that changed prior to death were strongly related to how an animal eventually died. Wolves killed by humans moved slower than wolves that survived and selected to be nearer roads closer in time to their death. Wolves that died due to CDV moved progressively slower as they neared death and reduced their avoidance of wet habitats. All animals, regardless of dying or not maintained strong selection to be near packmates across time, which seemingly contributed to disease dynamics in the packs that became infected with CDV. Habitat selection, movement, and sociality interact to put individuals and groups at greater risks, influencing their cause-specific mortality. Lay SummaryNot much is known about behaviors prior to death in wild animals. Grey wolves killed by humans selected to be in riskier areas increasingly prior to their deaths. Wolves that died due to disease moved slower and changed their habitat selection to be in areas with more water as they became sicker. Sick wolves also continued to select for packmates, increasing the chances that the whole pack would succumb to the disease.

animal behavior and cognition↗

bioRxiv2021

Moving together, foraging apart: effects of the social environment on movement-integrated habitat selection

O_LIMovement links the distribution of habitats with the social environment of animals using those habitats; yet integrating movement, habitat selection, and socioecology remains an opportunity for further study. C_LIO_LIHere, our objective was to disentangle the roles of habitat selection and social association as drivers of collective movement in a gregarious ungulate. To accomplish this objective, we (1) assessed whether socially familiar individuals form discrete social communities and whether social communities have high spatial, but not necessarily temporal, overlap; and (2) we modelled the relationship between collective movement and selection of foraging habitats using socially informed integrated step selection analysis. C_LIO_LIWe used social network analysis to assign individuals to social communities and determine short and long-term social preference among individuals. Using integrated step selection functions (iSSF), we then modelled the effect of social processes, i.e., nearest neighbour distance and social preference, and movement behaviour on patterns of habitat selection. C_LIO_LIBased on assignment of individuals to social communities and home range overlap analyses, individuals assorted into discrete social communities, and these communities had high spatial overlap. By unifying social network analysis with iSSF, we identified movement-dependent social association, where individuals foraged with more familiar individuals, but moved collectively with any between foraging patches. C_LIO_LIOur study demonstrates that social behaviour and space use are inter-related based on spatial overlap of social communities and movement-dependent habitat selection. Movement, habitat selection, and social behaviour are linked in theory. Here, we put these concepts into practice to demonstrate that movement is the glue connecting individual habitat selection to the social environment. C_LI

animal behavior and cognition↗