Search bioRxivSearch

Biology subjects

Kim, D.-K.

Publications and source records attributed to Kim, D.-K..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Network-based prediction of protein interactions

As biological function emerges through interactions between a cells molecular constituents, understanding cellular mechanisms requires us to catalogue all physical interactions between proteins [1-4]. Despite spectacular advances in high-throughput mapping, the number of missing human protein-protein interactions (PPIs) continues to exceed the experimentally documented interactions [5, 6]. Computational tools that exploit structural, sequence or network topology information are increasingly used to fill in the gap, using the patterns of the already known interactome to predict undetected, yet biologically relevant interactions [7-9]. Such network-based link prediction tools rely on the Triadic Closure Principle (TCP) [10-12], stating that two proteins likely interact if they share multiple interaction partners. TCP is rooted in social network analysis, namely the observation that the more common friends two individuals have, the more likely that they know each other [13, 14]. Here, we offer direct empirical evidence across multiple datasets and organisms that, despite its dominant use in biological link prediction, TCP is not valid for most protein pairs. We show that this failure is fundamental - TCP violates both structural constraints and evolutionary processes. This understanding allows us to propose a link prediction principle, consistent with both structural and evo-lutionary arguments, that predicts yet uncovered protein interactions based on paths of length three (L3). A systematic computational cross-validation shows that the L3 principle significantly outperforms existing link prediction methods. To experimentally test the L3 predictions, we perform both large-scale high-throughput and pairwise tests, finding that the predicted links test positively at the same rate as previously known interactions, suggesting that most (if not all) predicted interactions are real. Combining L3 predictions with experimen-tal tests provided new interaction partners of FAM161A, a protein linked to retinitis pigmentosa, offering novel insights into the molecular mechanisms that lead to the disease. Because L3 is rooted in a fundamental biological principle, we expect it to have a broad applicability, enabling us to better understand the emergence of biological function under both healthy and pathological conditions.\n\nSummaryWe unveil a fundamental organizing principle of biological networks and demonstrate its predictive power for uncovering novel protein interactions.

systems biology

Quantifying Immune-Based Counterselection of Somatic Mutations

It is now well established that somatic mutations in protein-coding regions can generate neoantigens, and that these can be recognized by the immune system and contribute to clearance of developing cancers. However, there is currently no model that can quantitatively predict the neoantigenic effect of any given somatic mutation. Here, we examined signatures of immune selection pressure on the distribution of somatic mutations. We quantified the extent to which somatic mutations are significantly depleted in peptides that are predicted to be displayed by major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I proteins. We characterized the dependence of this depletion on expression level. We then examined whether immune selection pressure on somatic mutations changes depending on whether the patient had either one or two MHC-encoding alleles that can display the peptide. Our results indicate that MHC-encoding alleles are, in general, incompletely dominant, i.e., that having two copies of the display-enabling allele is more effective in displaying that peptide than having just one copy. More generally, a quantitative understanding of counter-selection of identifiable subclasses of neoantigenic somatic variation could guide immunotherapy or aid in developing personalized cancer vaccines.

genetics