Biology subjects

Kilburn, L.

Publications and source records attributed to Kilburn, L..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2025

Mapping Tumor Microenvironment and Treatment Response of Diffuse Midline Glioma Using Multiplexed Immunofluorescence and AI Models

BackgroundDespite its clinical promise in non-solid tumor, immunotherapy is yet to show significant clinical efficacy for brain tumors including pediatric diffuse midline glioma (DMG). This indicated the need to fully explore DMG immune tumor microenvironment (TME). MethodWhole brains (49 DMGs, 20 non-DMG, 10 non-malignant) from 79 pediatric patients were used to establish a tissue microarray (918 cores) representing primary, metastatic, and adjacent healthy sites. CellDIVE MxIF multiplex assay was used to probe for 33 immune and cell type markers. RNA sequencing (n=62 patients) defined additional immune signatures. Findings were validated using patient plasma and DMG PDX models. Our annotated single-cell atlas was used to train a spatial AI model to predict antigens from H&E staining. FindingsWe found enrichment of M1-activated microglia in primary versus adjacent healthy tissue. PD1 positive cells were significantly (p<0.01) higher in tumor compared to adjacent controls. This was validated by mRNA profiling, further indicating two distinct groups with top 35 significant (p<0.05) genes revealing synaptic signature in the metastatic cohort. We stratified the patient cohort by treatment. Imipridone cohort (n=5) showed decreased progenitor (Nestin+, Vimentin+, and SOX2+) and increased macrophages/microglia infiltration. Increased T and B cells was validated in patient plasma following imipridone therapy. Combination therapy of imipridone and immunotherapy (n=7) resulted in increased myeloid (Iba1, CD68, CD163) and lymphoid (CD3, CD8) cells. Enhanced immune engagement was validated in DMG PDX models. Machine learning resulted in a spatial AI model capable of predicting 22 antigens using H&E slides. InterpretationsDMG tumors maintain a cold immune microenvironment, which is nevertheless dynamic and responsive to therapy, indicating the need to explore combination therapies. AI-assisted antigen detection is suitable for rapid interpretation of clinical biospecimens. FundingThis work was supported by Rising Tide, SNF, LilaBean Foundation, Swifty Foundation, Swiss to Cure DIPG and Yuvaan Tiwari Foundation. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=45 SRC="FIGDIR/small/644698v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (24K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@198b382org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@312e0forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@c71b82org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1df1c35_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG O_FLOATNOGraphical AbstractC_FLOATNO C_FIG

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2021

Clinical Efficacy of Prebiotics and Glycosaminoglycans versus Placebo In Dogs with Food Responsive Enteropathy Receiving a Hydrolyzed Diet: A Pilot Study

Induction of remission is easily achieved with dietary treatment in dogs diagnosed with Food Responsive Chronic Enteropathy (FRD). Administration of prebiotics and glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) may improve epithelial cell integrity and therefore be useful as adjunct treatment. This study evaluated whether the relapse rate of FRD dogs that are switched back to a normal diet can be influenced using supplemental treatment with prebiotics and GAGs. A randomized, controlled clinical trial (RCCT) was performed in dogs diagnosed with FRD. Dogs were diagnosed based on clinical exclusion diagnosis, endoscopic biopsies showing predominantly lymphoplasmacytic infiltration, and response to dietary treatment. Dogs were randomized to be fed a combination of prebiotics and GAGs (group 1) or placebo (group 2) in addition to a hydrolyzed diet. At week 10, a second endoscopy was performed and dogs were switched back to normal diet. Relapse rate was monitored every 2 weeks after that until week 18. Statistical analysis was performed for each outcome (Canine Chronic Enteropathy Clinical Activity Index (CCECAI), clinicopathological data, endoscopic scoring, mWSAVA histological scoring index (mWSAVA), and number of relapses following switch to normal diet) using a linear mixed effects model for group comparison. Time, group, and their interactions were included as a fixed effect, whereas each dog was treated as a random effect. Of the 35 dogs enrolled into the clinical trial, 10 in each group reached the point of second endoscopy. A total of 13 dogs (n=8 in group 1 and n=5 in group 2) reached the trial endpoint of 18 weeks. After switching back to normal diet, none of the dogs in either group relapsed. No significant differences were found over time or between groups for CCECAI, endoscopy scoring and histological scoring. Although there was a clinical worsening in the placebo group after switching back to the original diet, this was not statistically significant (CCECAI p=0.58). Post-hoc power calculation revealed that 63 dogs per group would have been needed to detect statistically significant differences in CIBDAI between treatment groups. Standard dietary treatment induced rapid clinical response in all cases, however, additional supplementation with prebiotics and GAGs did not significantly improve clinical outcome within 4 months after switching back to normal diet. Since there are very few RCCT published in CE in dogs, this pilot study provides important power analyses for planning of further studies.

immunology↗