Biology subjects

Kesselman, C.

Publications and source records attributed to Kesselman, C..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2018

Reproducible big data science: A case study in continuous FAIRness

Big biomedical data create exciting opportunities for discovery, but make it difficult to capture analyses and outputs in forms that are findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable (FAIR). In response, we describe tools that make it easy to capture, and assign identifiers to, data and code throughout the data lifecycle. We illustrate the use of these tools via a case study involving a multi-step analysis that creates an atlas of putative transcription factor binding sites from terabytes of ENCODE DNase I hypersensitive sites sequencing data. We show how the tools automate routine but complex tasks, capture analysis algorithms in understandable and reusable forms, and harness fast networks and powerful cloud computers to process data rapidly, all without sacrificing usability or reproducibility--thus ensuring that big data are not hard-to-(re)use data. We compare and contrast our approach with other approaches to big data analysis and reproducibility.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2018

BDQC: a general-purpose analytics tool for domain-blind validation of Big Data

Translational biomedical research is generating exponentially more data: thousands of whole-genome sequences (WGS) are now available; brain data are doubling every two years. Analyses of Big Data, including imaging, genomic, phenotypic, and clinical data, present qualitatively new challenges as well as opportunities. Among the challenges is a proliferation in ways analyses can fail, due largely to the increasing length and complexity of processing pipelines. Anomalies in input data, runtime resource exhaustion or node failure in a distributed computation can all cause pipeline hiccups that are not necessarily obvious in the output. Flaws that can taint results may persist undetected in complex pipelines, a danger amplified by the fact that research is often concurrent with the development of the software on which it depends. On the positive side, the huge sample sizes increase statistical power, which in turn can shed new insight and motivate innovative analytic approaches. We have developed a framework for Big Data Quality Control (BDQC) including an extensible set of heuristic and statistical analyses that identify deviations in data without regard to its meaning (domain-blind analyses). BDQC takes advantage of large sample sizes to classify the samples, estimate distributions and identify outliers. Such outliers may be symptoms of technology failure (e.g., truncated output of one step of a pipeline for a single genome) or may reveal unsuspected \" signal\" in the data (e.g., evidence of aneuploidy in a genome). We have applied the framework to validate real-world WGS analysis pipelines. BDQC successfully identified data outliers representing various failure classes, including genome analyses missing a whole chromosome or part thereof, hidden among thousands of intermediary output files. These failures could then be resolved by reanalyzing the affected samples. BDQC both identified hidden flaws as well as yielded new insights into the data. BDQC is designed to complement quality software development practices. There are multiple benefits from the application of BDQC at all pipeline stages. By verifying input correctness, it can help avoid expensive computations on flawed data. Analysis of intermediary and final results facilitates recovery from aberrant termination of processes. All these computationally inexpensive verifications reduce cryptic analytical artifacts that could seriously preclude clinical-grade genome interpretation. BDQC is available at https://github.com/ini-bdds/bdqc.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2018

Atlas of Transcription Factor Binding Sites from ENCODE DNase Hypersensitivity Data Across 27 Tissue Types

There is intense interest in mapping the tissue-specific binding sites of transcription factors in the human genome to reconstruct gene regulatory networks and predict functions for non-coding genetic variation. DNase-seq footprinting provides a means to predict genome-wide binding sites for hundreds of transcription factors (TFs) simultaneously. However, despite the public availability of DNase-seq data for hundreds of samples, there is neither a unified analytical workflow nor a publicly accessible database providing the locations of footprints across all available samples. Here, we implemented a workflow for uniform processing of footprints using two state-of-the-art footprinting algorithms: Wellington and HINT. Our workflow scans the footprints generated by these algorithms for 1,530 sequence motifs to predict binding sites for 1,515 human transcription factors. We applied our workflow to detect footprints in 192 DNase-seq experiments from ENCODE spanning 27 human tissues. This collection of footprints describes an expansive landscape of potential TF occupancy. At thresholds optimized through machine learning, we report high-quality footprints covering 9.8% of the human genome. These footprints were enriched for true positive TF binding sites as defined by ChIP-seq peaks, as well as for genetic variants associated with changes in gene expression. Integrating our footprint atlas with summary statistics from genome-wide association studies revealed that risk for neuropsychiatric traits was enriched specifically at highly-scoring footprints in human brain, while risk for immune traits was enriched specifically at highly-scoring footprints in human lymphoblasts. Our cloud-based workflow is available at github.com/globusgenomics/genomics-footprint and a database with all footprints and TF binding site predictions are publicly available at http://data.nemoarchive.org/other/grant/sament/sament/footprint_atlas.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2016

MultiCellDS: a standard and a community for sharing multicellular data

Cell biology is increasingly focused on cellular heterogeneity and multicellular systems. To make the fullest use of experimental, clinical, and computational efforts, we need standardized data formats, community-curated \"public data libraries\", and tools to combine and analyze shared data. To address these needs, our multidisciplinary community created MultiCellDS (MultiCellular Data Standard): an extensible standard, a library of digital cell lines and tissue snapshots, and support software. With the help of experimentalists, clinicians, modelers, and data and library scientists, we can grow this seed into a community-owned ecosystem of shared data and tools, to the benefit of basic science, engineering, and human health.

systems biology↗

bioRxiv2016

MultiCellDS: a community-developed standard for curating microenvironment-dependent multicellular data

Exchanging and understanding scientific data and their context represents a significant barrier to advancing research, especially with respect to information siloing. Maintaining information provenance and providing data curation and quality control help overcome common concerns and barriers to the effective sharing of scientific data. To address these problems in and the unique challenges of multicellular systems, we assembled a panel composed of investigators from several disciplines to create the MultiCellular Data Standard (MultiCellDS) with a use-case driven development process. The standard includes (1) digital cell lines, which are analogous to traditional biological cell lines, to record metadata, cellular microenvironment, and cellular phenotype variables of a biological cell line, (2) digital snapshots to consistently record simulation, experimental, and clinical data for multicellular systems, and (3) collections that can logically group digital cell lines and snapshots. We have created a MultiCellular DataBase (MultiCellDB) to store digital snapshots and the 200+ digital cell lines we have generated. MultiCellDS, by having a fixed standard, enables discoverability, extensibility, maintainability, searchability, and sustainability of data, creating biological applicability and clinical utility that permits us to identify upcoming challenges to uplift biology and strategies and therapies for improving human health.

systems biology↗