Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Kerr, T.

Publications and source records attributed to Kerr, T..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Computational modelling reveals slower safety learning and threat extinction are associated with higher anxiety severity in remote fear conditioning

Anxiety disorders are are chronic, pervasive, and debilitating; characterised by a persistent or exaggerated response to distal or abstract threats. Impaired threat discrimination (distinguishing safe from threatening stimuli) and impaired threat extinction (learning a once threatening stimulus is now safe), are known risk factors in the development and persistence of anxiety disorders. These effects can be experimentally elicited through fear conditioning. First, repeated trials of paired aversive and neutral stimuli are delivered during a fear acquisition phase, followed by repeated trials with no aversive stimuli in a fear extinction phase. The effects are typically measured through comparison of end-phase data points, or simple descriptive or statistical models. Computational modelling, by contrast, can offer a hypothesis-driven, trial-by-trial mechanistic account of fear conditioning. This unmasks within subject task variance by estimating the rate of threat learning, safety learning, and threat extinction, examining individual differences in the cognitive mechanisms behind anxiety. A normative sample (n = 145) underwent a differential fear conditioning task on a bespoke smartphone app, in addition to completing an anxiety severity measure (GAD-7). Computational models fitted to task data estimated learning rates. Whilst the threat learning rate showed no association, the threat extinction and safety learning rates showed small negative associations with anxiety severity (r = -0.218, p = 0.008 & r = -0.214, p = 0.01 respectively). These findings are in keeping with prior studies using traditional analytical approaches, and indicate that anxious individuals are not quicker to develop fear of a stimulus, but take more time than their non-anxious counterparts to learn that a stimulus is safe. This study strengthens the evidence for impairments in fear extinction in those with anxiety, and the importance of learning rates as an index of anxiety severity, a previously hidden cognitive mechanism underlying anxiety persistence.

neuroscience↗

Medial prefrontal cortical neurotransmitters reactive to relapse-promoting and relapse-suppressing cues in rats trained to self-administer cocaine or alcohol

Environmental cues conditioned to signal drug availability (S+) or omission (S-) activate specific neurons (neuronal ensembles/engram cells) within the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) to promote and suppress drug relapse in rats. However, the neurochemical source of such cue-specific activation remains unknown. In this study, we determined extracellular neurotransmitter fluctuations reactive to S+ vs. S- in the infralimbic (IL) and prelimbic (PL) cortices of male rats trained to lever-press for cocaine or alcohol self-administration. In cocaine- or alcohol-trained rats exposed to S+, no significant neurotransmitter fluctuations were observed in IL or PL. In cocaine-trained rats exposed to S-, glutamate, serotonin, taurine and adenosine were increased in PL but not in IL. In alcohol-trained rats exposed to S-, glutamate was increased, while dopamine and GABA were decreased, in IL but not in PL. Although S+ reactive neurotransmitters driving neuronal activation in mPFC remains to be elucidated, glutamate is likely the source of such activation by S- in rats trained to self-administer cocaine or alcohol. While drugs used for self-administration and cue-conditioning appear to dictate the type and anatomical specificity of S- evoked neurotransmission within mPFC, glutamate may serve as a common therapeutic target to mimic relapse-suppression by S- across cocaine and alcohol use disorders (CUD and AUD). In contrast, serotonin, taurine and adenosine may serve as the targets in CUD, while dopamine and GABA may serve as the targets in AUD.

neuroscience↗